Literature DB >> 29113898

Finding order in chemical chaos - Continuing characterization of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists.

Julie A Marusich1, Jenny L Wiley1, Timothy W Lefever1, Purvi R Patel1, Brian F Thomas2.   

Abstract

Diversion of synthetic cannabinoids from the lab to drugs of abuse has become increasingly prevalent in recent years. Moreover, as earlier synthetic cannabinoids were banned, manufacturers introduced a new supply of novel compounds to serve as replacements. Hence, the chemical diversity of synthetic cannabinoid analogs has also rapidly increased. The present study examined 8 new synthetic cannabinoids: AM-1220, AM-2232, AM-2233, AM-679, EAM-2201, JWH-210, JHW-251, and MAM-2201. Each compound was assessed for binding affinity and functional activation of CB1 and CB2 receptors, and pharmacological equivalence with Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in THC drug discrimination. All compounds bound to and activated CB1 and CB2 receptors, although efficacy at the CB2 receptor was reduced compared to that for the CB1 receptor. Similarly, all compounds stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding through the CB1 receptor, and all compounds except AM-1220 and AM-2233 stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding through the CB2 receptor. Furthermore, these compounds, along with CP55,940, substituted for THC in THC drug discrimination. Rank order of potency in drug discrimination was correlated with CB1 receptor binding affinity. Together, these results suggest that all test compounds share the THC-like subjective effects of marijuana. Interestingly, the most potent compounds in CB1 binding in the present study were also the compounds that have been found recently in the U.S., MAM-2201, EAM-2201, JWH-210, AM-2233, and AM-1220. These results indicate that the evolution of the synthetic cannabinoid drug market may be focused toward compounds with increased potency. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Designer Drugs and Legal Highs.'
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abuse liability; Drug discrimination; Receptor binding; Synthetic cannabinoids; Δ;(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29113898      PMCID: PMC5934329          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.10.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropharmacology        ISSN: 0028-3908            Impact factor:   5.250


  69 in total

1.  Cannabinoid agonists differentially substitute for the discriminative stimulus effects of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Lance R McMahon; Brett C Ginsburg; R J Lamb
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Evaluation of cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists using the guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)-triphosphate binding assay in rat cerebellar membranes.

Authors:  G Griffin; P J Atkinson; V M Showalter; B R Martin; M E Abood
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Evaluation of WIN 55,212-2 self-administration in rats as a potential cannabinoid abuse liability model.

Authors:  Timothy W Lefever; Julie A Marusich; Kateland R Antonazzo; Jenny L Wiley
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  MAM-2201, a synthetic cannabinoid drug of abuse, suppresses the synaptic input to cerebellar Purkinje cells via activation of presynaptic CB1 receptors.

Authors:  Tomohiko Irie; Ruri Kikura-Hanajiri; Makoto Usami; Nahoko Uchiyama; Yukihiro Goda; Yuko Sekino
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.250

5.  Detection and Activity Profiling of Synthetic Cannabinoids and Their Metabolites with a Newly Developed Bioassay.

Authors:  Annelies Cannaert; Jolien Storme; Florian Franz; Volker Auwärter; Christophe P Stove
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  A behavioural model to reveal place preference to delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol in mice.

Authors:  E Valjent; R Maldonado
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Cannabinoid structure-activity relationships: correlation of receptor binding and in vivo activities.

Authors:  D R Compton; K C Rice; B R De Costa; R K Razdan; L S Melvin; M R Johnson; B R Martin
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  Pharmacological profile of a series of bicyclic cannabinoid analogs: classification as cannabimimetic agents.

Authors:  D R Compton; M R Johnson; L S Melvin; B R Martin
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Adverse effects after the use of JWH-210 - a case series from the EU Spice II plus project.

Authors:  Maren Hermanns-Clausen; Josephine Kithinji; Marco Spehl; Verena Angerer; Florian Franz; Florian Eyer; Volker Auwärter
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.345

10.  One-pot heterogeneous synthesis of Δ(3)-tetrahydrocannabinol analogues and xanthenes showing differential binding to CB(1) and CB(2) receptors.

Authors:  Ornelio Rosati; Federica Messina; Azzurra Pelosi; Massimo Curini; Vanessa Petrucci; Jürg Gertsch; Andrea Chicca
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 6.514

View more
  7 in total

1.  Structure-activity relationships for 5F-MDMB-PICA and its 5F-pentylindole analogs to induce cannabinoid-like effects in mice.

Authors:  Grant C Glatfelter; John S Partilla; Michael H Baumann
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 8.294

2.  Molecular and Behavioral Pharmacological Characterization of Abused Synthetic Cannabinoids MMB- and MDMB-FUBINACA, MN-18, NNEI, CUMYL-PICA, and 5-Fluoro-CUMYL-PICA.

Authors:  Thomas F Gamage; Charlotte E Farquhar; Timothy W Lefever; Julie A Marusich; Richard C Kevin; Iain S McGregor; Jenny L Wiley; Brian F Thomas
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  In vitro and in vivo pharmacological evaluation of the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist EG-018.

Authors:  Thomas F Gamage; Daniel G Barrus; Richard C Kevin; David B Finlay; Timothy W Lefever; Purvi R Patel; Megan A Grabenauer; Michelle Glass; Iain S McGregor; Jenny L Wiley; Brian F Thomas
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  In Vitro Inhibitory Effects of Synthetic Cannabinoid EAM-2201 on Cytochrome P450 and UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase Enzyme Activities in Human Liver Microsomes.

Authors:  Tae Yeon Kong; Soon-Sang Kwon; Jae Chul Cheong; Hee Seung Kim; Jin Young Kim; Hye Suk Lee
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 5.  Affinity Assays for Cannabinoids Detection: Are They Amenable to On-Site Screening?

Authors:  Mihaela Puiu; Camelia Bala
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-06

Review 6.  Cannabinoids in the Pathophysiology of Skin Inflammation.

Authors:  Cristian Scheau; Ioana Anca Badarau; Livia-Gratiela Mihai; Andreea-Elena Scheau; Daniel Octavian Costache; Carolina Constantin; Daniela Calina; Constantin Caruntu; Raluca Simona Costache; Ana Caruntu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.927

Review 7.  Molecular Pharmacology of Synthetic Cannabinoids: Delineating CB1 Receptor-Mediated Cell Signaling.

Authors:  Kenneth B Walsh; Haley K Andersen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.