Jayanta Kumar Biswas1, Masud Rana2, Santanu Majumder1, Santanu Kumar Karmakar2, Amit Roychowdhury3. 1. Dept. of Aerospace Engineering & Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, Howrah, 711103, India. 2. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, Howrah, 711103, India. 3. Dept. of Aerospace Engineering & Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, Howrah, 711103, India. Electronic address: amit@aero.iiests.ac.in.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pedicle-screw-rod fixation system is very popular surgical remedy for degenerative disc disease. It is important to observe load vs. spinal motion characteristic for better understanding of clinical problems and treatment of spinal instability associated with low-back pain. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to understand the effect [range of motion (ROM) and intervertebral foramen height] of pedicle-screw fixation with three rod materials on lumbar spine under three physiological loading conditions. METHOD: A three-dimensional finite element (FE) model of lumbar to sacrum (L1-S) vertebrae with pedicle-screw-rod fixation at L3-L5 level is developed. Three rod materials [titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V), ultra-high molecular weight poly ethylene (UHMWPE) and poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK)] are used for two-level fixation and the FE models are simulated for axial rotation, lateral bending and flexion-extension under ±10 Nm moment and 500 N compressive load and compared with the intact (natural) model. RESULT & DISCUSSION: For axial rotation, lateral bending and flexion, ROM increased 2.8, 4.5 and 1.83 times respectively for UHMWPE, and 3.7, 7.2 and 2.15 times respectively for PEEK in comparison to Ti6Al4V. As ROM is 49, 29 and 31% of the intact model during axial rotation, lateral bending and flexion respectively, PEEK rod produced better motion flexibility than Ti6Al4V and UHMWPE rod. Foramen height increased insignificantly by 2.21% for the PEEK rod with respect to the intact spine during flexion. For the PEEK rod, maximum stress of 40 MPa during axial rotation is much below the yield stress of 98 MPa. CONCLUSION: Ti6Al4V pedicle-screw-rod fixation system highly restricted the ROM of the spine, which is improved by using UHMWPE and PEEK, having lower stiffness. The foramen height did not vary significantly for any implant materials. In terms of ROM and maximum stress, PEEK rod may be considered for a better implant design to get better ROM and thus mobility.
BACKGROUND: Pedicle-screw-rod fixation system is very popular surgical remedy for degenerative disc disease. It is important to observe load vs. spinal motion characteristic for better understanding of clinical problems and treatment of spinal instability associated with low-back pain. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to understand the effect [range of motion (ROM) and intervertebral foramen height] of pedicle-screw fixation with three rod materials on lumbar spine under three physiological loading conditions. METHOD: A three-dimensional finite element (FE) model of lumbar to sacrum (L1-S) vertebrae with pedicle-screw-rod fixation at L3-L5 level is developed. Three rod materials [titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V), ultra-high molecular weight poly ethylene (UHMWPE) and poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK)] are used for two-level fixation and the FE models are simulated for axial rotation, lateral bending and flexion-extension under ±10 Nm moment and 500 N compressive load and compared with the intact (natural) model. RESULT & DISCUSSION: For axial rotation, lateral bending and flexion, ROM increased 2.8, 4.5 and 1.83 times respectively for UHMWPE, and 3.7, 7.2 and 2.15 times respectively for PEEK in comparison to Ti6Al4V. As ROM is 49, 29 and 31% of the intact model during axial rotation, lateral bending and flexion respectively, PEEK rod produced better motion flexibility than Ti6Al4V and UHMWPE rod. Foramen height increased insignificantly by 2.21% for the PEEK rod with respect to the intact spine during flexion. For the PEEK rod, maximum stress of 40 MPa during axial rotation is much below the yield stress of 98 MPa. CONCLUSION: Ti6Al4V pedicle-screw-rod fixation system highly restricted the ROM of the spine, which is improved by using UHMWPE and PEEK, having lower stiffness. The foramen height did not vary significantly for any implant materials. In terms of ROM and maximum stress, PEEK rod may be considered for a better implant design to get better ROM and thus mobility.