INTRODUCTION: Tests of visuospatial function are often administered in comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations. These tests are generally considered assays of parietal lobe function; however, the neural correlates of these tests, using modern imaging techniques, are not well understood. In the current study we investigated the relationship between three commonly used tests of visuospatial function and lobar cortical thickness in each hemisphere. METHOD: Data from 374 patients who underwent a neuropsychological evaluation and MRI scans in an outpatient dementia clinic were included in the analysis. We examined the relationships between cortical thickness, as assessed with Freesurfer, and performance on three tests: Judgment of Line Orientation (JoLO), Block Design (BD) from the Fourth edition of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised Copy Trial (BVMT-R-C) in patients who showed overall average performance on these tasks. Using a series of multiple regression models, we assessed which lobe's overall cortical thickness best predicted test performance. RESULTS: Among the individual lobes, JoLO performance was best predicted by cortical thickness in the right temporal lobe. BD performance was best predicted by cortical thickness in the right parietal lobe, and BVMT-R-C performance was best predicted by cortical thickness in the left parietal lobe. CONCLUSIONS: Performance on constructional tests of visuospatial function appears to correspond best with underlying cortical thickness of the parietal lobes, while performance on visuospatial judgment tests appears to correspond best to temporal lobe thickness. Future research using voxel-wise and connectivity techniques and including more diverse samples will help further understanding of the regions and networks involved in visuospatial tests.
INTRODUCTION: Tests of visuospatial function are often administered in comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations. These tests are generally considered assays of parietal lobe function; however, the neural correlates of these tests, using modern imaging techniques, are not well understood. In the current study we investigated the relationship between three commonly used tests of visuospatial function and lobar cortical thickness in each hemisphere. METHOD: Data from 374 patients who underwent a neuropsychological evaluation and MRI scans in an outpatientdementia clinic were included in the analysis. We examined the relationships between cortical thickness, as assessed with Freesurfer, and performance on three tests: Judgment of Line Orientation (JoLO), Block Design (BD) from the Fourth edition of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised Copy Trial (BVMT-R-C) in patients who showed overall average performance on these tasks. Using a series of multiple regression models, we assessed which lobe's overall cortical thickness best predicted test performance. RESULTS: Among the individual lobes, JoLO performance was best predicted by cortical thickness in the right temporal lobe. BD performance was best predicted by cortical thickness in the right parietal lobe, and BVMT-R-C performance was best predicted by cortical thickness in the left parietal lobe. CONCLUSIONS: Performance on constructional tests of visuospatial function appears to correspond best with underlying cortical thickness of the parietal lobes, while performance on visuospatial judgment tests appears to correspond best to temporal lobe thickness. Future research using voxel-wise and connectivity techniques and including more diverse samples will help further understanding of the regions and networks involved in visuospatial tests.
Authors: Manja Lehmann; Jonathan D Rohrer; Matthew J Clarkson; Gerard R Ridgway; Rachael I Scahill; Marc Modat; Jason D Warren; Sebastien Ourselin; Josephine Barnes; Martin N Rossor; Nick C Fox Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2010 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Young Noh; Seun Jeon; Jong Min Lee; Sang Won Seo; Geon Ha Kim; Hanna Cho; Byoung Seok Ye; Cindy W Yoon; Hee Jin Kim; Juhee Chin; Kee Hyung Park; Kenneth M Heilman; Duk L Na Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Izelle Labuschagne; Amy Mulick Cassidy; Rachael I Scahill; Eileanoir B Johnson; Elin Rees; Alison O'Regan; Sarah Queller; Chris Frost; Blair R Leavitt; Alexandra Dürr; Raymond Roos; Gail Owen; Beth Borowsky; Sarah J Tabrizi; Julie C Stout Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Jason K Longhurst; Morgan A Wise; Daniel J Krist; Caitlin A Moreland; Jon A Basterrechea; Merrill R Landers Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2020-04-29 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Sung Hoon Kang; Yu Hyun Park; Daun Lee; Jun Pyo Kim; Juhee Chin; Yisuh Ahn; Seong Beom Park; Hee Jin Kim; Hyemin Jang; Young Hee Jung; Jaeho Kim; Jongmin Lee; Ji-Sun Kim; Bo Kyoung Cheon; Alice Hahn; Hyejoo Lee; Duk L Na; Young Ju Kim; Sang Won Seo Journal: Dement Neurocogn Disord Date: 2019-10-02
Authors: Alexander T Wilson; Catherine A de Planque; Sumin S Yang; Robert C Tasker; Marie-Lise C van Veelen; Marjolein H G Dremmen; Henri A Vrooman; Irene M J Mathijssen Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2020-04-11