| Literature DB >> 29113231 |
Gaixia Lu1, Yushui Ma1, Chengyou Jia1, Huiqiong Yang1, Ruting Xie1, Pei Luo1, Li Chai1, Haidong Cai1, Mingxiang Cai1, Zhongwei Lv1, Xianling Cong2, Da Fu1,3.
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) serve an important role in tumorigenesis and development. Although a low expression of miR-125a in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been reported, the clinical significance remains unknown. In the current study, the data of Gene Expression Omnibus datasets was analyzed and significantly low expression of miR-125a in HCC was verified. Furthermore, the expression and clinical significance of miR-125a was investigated in 27 normal liver and 98 HCC tissue samples using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis. The results demonstrated that the level of miR-125a expression was lower in HCC biopsies compared with that in normal liver tissues. Survival analysis established that miR-125a expression was negatively associated with the prognosis of HCC. Multivariate survival analysis demonstrated that patients with HCC with lowmiR-125a and Ki67-positive expression have shorter overall, and disease-free survival times. Altogether, the results of the current study provide the first evidence that reducedmiR-125a expression is associated with HCC progression and poor prognosis in patients, suggesting that miR-125a may have potential prognostic value as a tumor biomarker for patients with HCC.Entities:
Keywords: disease-free survival; hepatocellular carcinoma; microR-125a; overall survival; risk factor
Year: 2017 PMID: 29113231 PMCID: PMC5661598 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6902
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Univariate analysis of overall survival based on patients stratified by clinical characteristics.
| Overall survival | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | No. of patients | miR-125a expression[ | P-value | Months (median) | 95% CI (median) | P-value (Log-rank test) |
| Age (years) | ||||||
| ≥60 | 52 | 1.62±0.35 | 0.822 | 81.19 | 67.14–95.24 | 0.468 |
| <60 | 46 | 1.52±0.27 | 73.01 | 54.16–91.86 | ||
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 80 | 1.45±0.19 | 0.274 | 75.81 | 60.89–90.73 | 0.277 |
| Female | 18 | 2.06±0.78 | 90.17 | 68.62–111.72 | ||
| No. of lesions | ||||||
| Single | 63 | 1.79±0.37 | 0.431 | 88.44 | 76.56–100.33 | 0.003 |
| Multiple | 35 | 1.44±0.27 | 51.13 | 30.31–71.96 | ||
| Invasion to tumor capsule | ||||||
| Negative | 43 | 1.95±0.22 | 0.472 | 101.21 | 86.34–116.06 | 0.019 |
| Positive | 41 | 1.59±0.44 | 45.37 | 34.27–56.47 | ||
| Unknown | 14 | 1.32±0.61 | 30.79 | 23.07–38.51 | ||
| Tumor differentiation | ||||||
| Poorly | 18 | 1.72±0.28 | 0.391 | 40.21 | 35.48–51.93 | 0.062 |
| Moderately | 62 | 1.06±0.43 | 49.36 | 41.25–58.76 | ||
| Well | 8 | 1.03±0.41 | 45.45 | 32.47–55.61 | ||
| Unknown | 10 | 1.55±0.62 | 20.26 | 16.74–32.93 | ||
| Ki67 expression | ||||||
| Negative | 21 | 1.31±0.27 | 0.027 | 45.84 | 30.21–61.48 | 0.005 |
| Positive | 35 | 0.60±0.17 | 55.52 | 37.04–74.01 | ||
| Unknown | 42 | 0.71±0.31 | 80.15 | 66.89–93.39 | ||
| TNM stage | ||||||
| I–II | 7 | 0.86±0.61 | 0.836 | 51.17 | 34.98–67.35 | 0.051 |
| III–IV | 6 | 0.69±0.52 | 47.29 | 27.34–67.23 | ||
| Unknown | 85 | 0.63±0.16 | 84.05 | 71.65–96.45 | ||
| Drinking status | ||||||
| Negative | 72 | 1.80±0.26 | 0.038 | 66.34 | 45.62–81.21 | 0.413 |
| Positive | 18 | 0.68±0.21 | 55.26 | 43.79–74.38 | ||
| Unknown | 8 | 1.13±0.52 | 75.39 | 64.11–84.95 | ||
| Tumor capsule | ||||||
| Negative | 36 | 2.21±0.49 | 0.125 | 45.69 | 33.94–57.47 | 0.009 |
| Positive | 48 | 1.45±0.19 | 93.57 | 76.06–111.09 | ||
| Unknown | 14 | 1.75±0.48 | 30.79 | 23.07–38.51 | ||
| Tumor embolus | ||||||
| Negative | 64 | 2.21±0.58 | 0.064 | 87.64 | 69.28–106.01 | 0.008 |
| Positive | 30 | 1.33±0.18 | 43.44 | 31.03–55.85 | ||
| Unknown | 4 | 1.81±0.55 | 92.75 | 48.19–137.31 | ||
| Diameter (cm) | ||||||
| ≥5 | 58 | 1.25±0.23 | 0.226 | 49.92 | 38.73–61.12 | 0.149 |
| <5 | 40 | 1.78±0.32 | 92.28 | 77.67–106.89 | ||
Data presented as the mean ± standard deviation. CI, confidence interval; TNM, tumor node metastasis; miR, microRNA.
Figure 1.Analysis of miRNAs expression in patients with HCC was performed using GEO datasets, and MEV4.7.1 clustering software was used to analyze differential miRNAs. (A) Clustering analysis was performed using the MEV4.7.1 based on 56 dysregulated miRNAs using a FC≥2 and P<0.05. miR-125a expression levels in HCC tissue vs. normal tissue were analyzedusing the GEO database, (B) GSE20594 and (C) GSE36915. FC, fold change; miR, microRNA; GEO, Gene Expression Omnibus; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.
Figure 2.miR-125a expression in normal liver and HCC tissues. (A) miR-125a expression levels in HCC vs. paired adjacent non-tumor tissue (n=27). (B) miR-125a expression in HCC samples (n=98) and adjacent non-tumor tissue (n=27) were analyzed.FC, fold change; miR, microRNA.
Cox regression model analysis for prognosis based on various clinical characteristics in patients with HCC.
| miR-125a univariate analysis | miR-125a multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | HR | 95% CI | P-value | HR | 95% CI | P-value |
| Age (years) | 1.259 | 0.670–2.364 | 0.474 | |||
| Gender | 0.600 | 0.235–1.536 | 0.287 | |||
| No. of lesions | 2.291 | 1.326–3.678 | 0.005 | |||
| Invasion to tumor capsule | 1.575 | 1.006–2.465 | 0.047 | |||
| Tumor differentiation | 0.843 | 0.511–1.391 | 0.504 | |||
| Ki67 expression | 1.745 | 1.183–2.577 | 0.005 | 2.561 | 1.578 - 4.375 | <0.001 |
| TNM stage | 1.121 | 0.627–2.005 | 0.701 | |||
| Drinking status | 1.145 | 0.572–2.292 | 0.702 | |||
| Tumor capsule | 0.543 | 0.316–0.935 | 0.027 | |||
| Tumor embolus | 1.569 | 0.976–2.522 | 0.063 | |||
| Diameter | 1.575 | 0.840–2.951 | 0.156 | |||
| miR-125a | 0.479 | 0.250–0.920 | 0.027 | |||
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; TNM, tumor node metastasis; miR, microRNA.
Figure 3.Survival analysis of miR-125a and Ki67 expression in patients with HCC. Univariate survival analysis of (A) OS and (B) DFS in HCC as determined by Kaplan-Meier plots based on miR-125a expression. Univariate survival analysis of (C) OS and (D) DFS in HCC as determined by Kaplan-Meier plots based on Ki67 expression. Multivariate analysis of (E) OS and (F) DFS by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis based on miR-125a, and Ki67 expression. miR, microRNA; OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival; N&H, Ki67-negative and high miR-125a; P&L, Ki67-positive and low miR-125a expression.