Literature DB >> 29113026

How gut transcriptional function of Drosophila melanogaster varies with the presence and composition of the gut microbiota.

Alyssa Bost1, Soeren Franzenburg1, Karen L Adair1, Vincent G Martinson2, Greg Loeb1,3, Angela E Douglas1,4.   

Abstract

Despite evidence from laboratory experiments that perturbation of the gut microbiota affects many traits of the animal host, our understanding of the effect of variation in microbiota composition on animals in natural populations is very limited. The core purpose of this study on the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster was to identify the impact of natural variation in the taxonomic composition of gut bacterial communities on host traits, with the gut transcriptome as a molecular index of microbiota-responsive host traits. Use of the gut transcriptome was validated by demonstrating significant transcriptional differences between the guts of laboratory flies colonized with bacteria and maintained under axenic conditions. Wild Drosophila from six field collections made over two years had gut bacterial communities of diverse composition, dominated to varying extents by Acetobacteraceae and Enterobacteriaceae. The gut transcriptomes also varied among collections and differed markedly from those of laboratory flies. However, no overall relationship between variation in the wild fly transcriptome and taxonomic composition of the gut microbiota was evident at all taxonomic scales of bacteria tested for both individual fly genes and functional categories in Gene Ontology. We conclude that the interaction between microbiota composition and host functional traits may be confounded by uncontrolled variation in both ecological circumstance and host traits (e.g., genotype, age physiological condition) under natural conditions, and that microbiota effects on host traits identified in the laboratory should, therefore, be extrapolated to field population with great caution.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA gene amplicon; Acetobacteraceae; functional redundancy; germ-free animals; gnotobiotic; microbiome; transcriptomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29113026     DOI: 10.1111/mec.14413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  6 in total

1.  Gut microbes alter the walking activity of fruit flies.

Authors:  Angela E Douglas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Beneficial commensal bacteria promote Drosophila growth by downregulating the expression of peptidoglycan recognition proteins.

Authors:  Marialaura Gallo; Justin M Vento; Pauline Joncour; Andrea Quagliariello; Elisa Maritan; Nuno F Silva-Soares; Matteo Battistolli; Chase L Beisel; Maria Elena Martino
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-05-05

3.  Functional traits of the gut microbiome correlated with host lipid content in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  David Kang; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  The microbiota influences the Drosophila melanogaster life history strategy.

Authors:  Amber W Walters; Rachel C Hughes; Tanner B Call; Carson J Walker; Hailey Wilcox; Samara C Petersen; Seth M Rudman; Peter D Newell; Angela E Douglas; Paul S Schmidt; John M Chaston
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  The Gram-Positive Bacterium Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides Shows Insecticidal Activity against Drosophilid and Aphid Pests.

Authors:  Nils Hiebert; Tobias Kessel; Marisa Skaljac; Marius Spohn; Andreas Vilcinskas; Kwang-Zin Lee
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.769

Review 6.  The Microbiota and Gut-Related Disorders: Insights from Animal Models.

Authors:  Layla Kamareddine; Hoda Najjar; Muhammad Umar Sohail; Hadil Abdulkader; Maha Al-Asmakh
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 6.600

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.