Literature DB >> 29113023

Metabarcoding of freshwater invertebrates to detect the effects of a pesticide spill.

Carmelo Andújar1,2,3, Paula Arribas1,2,3, Clare Gray2, Catherine Bruce4, Guy Woodward2, Douglas W Yu5,6, Alfried P Vogler1,2.   

Abstract

Biomonitoring underpins the environmental assessment of freshwater ecosystems and guides management and conservation. Current methodology for surveys of (macro)invertebrates uses coarse taxonomic identification where species-level resolution is difficult to obtain. Next-generation sequencing of entire assemblages (metabarcoding) provides a new approach for species detection, but requires further validation. We used metabarcoding of invertebrate assemblages with two fragments of the cox1 "barcode" and partial nuclear ribosomal (SSU) genes, to assess the effects of a pesticide spill in the River Kennet (southern England). Operational taxonomic unit (OTU) recovery was tested under 72 parameters (read denoising, filtering, pair merging and clustering). Similar taxonomic profiles were obtained under a broad range of parameters. The SSU marker recovered Platyhelminthes and Nematoda, missed by cox1, while Rotifera were only amplified with cox1. A reference set was created from all available barcode entries for Arthropoda in the BOLD database and clustered into OTUs. The River Kennet metabarcoding produced matches to 207 of these reference OTUs, five times the number of species recognized with morphological monitoring. The increase was due to the following: greater taxonomic resolution (e.g., splitting a single morphotaxon "Chironomidae" into 55 named OTUs); splitting of Linnaean binomials into multiple molecular OTUs; and the use of a filtration-flotation protocol for extraction of minute specimens (meiofauna). Community analyses revealed strong differences between "impacted" vs. "control" samples, detectable with each gene marker, for each major taxonomic group, and for meio- and macrofaunal samples separately. Thus, highly resolved taxonomic data can be extracted at a fraction of the time and cost of traditional nonmolecular methods, opening new avenues for freshwater invertebrate biodiversity monitoring and molecular ecology.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA barcoding; biomonitoring; community ecology; freshwater ecosystems; invertebrates

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29113023     DOI: 10.1111/mec.14410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  8 in total

1.  Toward global integration of biodiversity big data: a harmonized metabarcode data generation module for terrestrial arthropods.

Authors:  Paula Arribas; Carmelo Andújar; Kristine Bohmann; Jeremy R deWaard; Evan P Economo; Vasco Elbrecht; Stefan Geisen; Marta Goberna; Henrik Krehenwinkel; Vojtech Novotny; Lucie Zinger; Thomas J Creedy; Emmanouil Meramveliotakis; Víctor Noguerales; Isaac Overcast; Hélène Morlon; Anna Papadopoulou; Alfried P Vogler; Brent C Emerson
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 7.658

2.  Validation of COI metabarcoding primers for terrestrial arthropods.

Authors:  Vasco Elbrecht; Thomas W A Braukmann; Natalia V Ivanova; Sean W J Prosser; Mehrdad Hajibabaei; Michael Wright; Evgeny V Zakharov; Paul D N Hebert; Dirk Steinke
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Have the cake and eat it: Optimizing nondestructive DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrate samples for freshwater biomonitoring.

Authors:  Filipa M S Martins; Mafalda Galhardo; Ana F Filipe; Amílcar Teixeira; Paulo Pinheiro; Joana Paupério; Paulo C Alves; Pedro Beja
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 7.090

4.  Developing a non-destructive metabarcoding protocol for detection of pest insects in bulk trap catches.

Authors:  Jana Batovska; Alexander M Piper; Isabel Valenzuela; John Paul Cunningham; Mark J Blacket
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  A DNA barcode survey of insect biodiversity in Pakistan.

Authors:  Muhammad Ashfaq; Arif M Khan; Akhtar Rasool; Saleem Akhtar; Naila Nazir; Nazeer Ahmed; Farkhanda Manzoor; Jayme Sones; Kate Perez; Ghulam Sarwar; Azhar A Khan; Muhammad Akhter; Shafqat Saeed; Riffat Sultana; Hafiz Muhammad Tahir; Muhammad A Rafi; Romana Iftikhar; Muhammad Tayyib Naseem; Mariyam Masood; Muhammad Tufail; Santosh Kumar; Sabila Afzal; Jaclyn McKeown; Ahmed Ali Samejo; Imran Khaliq; Michelle L D'Souza; Shahid Mansoor; Paul D N Hebert
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.061

Review 6.  Coming of age for COI metabarcoding of whole organism community DNA: Towards bioinformatic harmonisation.

Authors:  Thomas J Creedy; Carmelo Andújar; Emmanouil Meramveliotakis; Victor Noguerales; Isaac Overcast; Anna Papadopoulou; Hélène Morlon; Alfried P Vogler; Brent C Emerson; Paula Arribas
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 8.678

7.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals comparable responses to agricultural stressors on different trophic levels of a freshwater community.

Authors:  Kevin K Beentjes; S Henrik Barmentlo; Ellen Cieraad; Menno Schilthuizen; Berry B van der Hoorn; Arjen G C L Speksnijder; Krijn B Trimbos
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 6.622

Review 8.  Reinforcement of Environmental DNA Based Methods (Sensu Stricto) in Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation: A Review.

Authors:  Pritam Banerjee; Gobinda Dey; Caterina M Antognazza; Raju Kumar Sharma; Jyoti Prakash Maity; Michael W Y Chan; Yi-Hsun Huang; Pin-Yun Lin; Hung-Chun Chao; Chung-Ming Lu; Chien-Yen Chen
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.