| Literature DB >> 29112798 |
Andee Agius1, Neville Calleja2,3, Christian Camenzuli4,5, Roberta Sultana6, Richard Pullicino7, Christian Zammit5, Jean Calleja Agius5, Cristoforo Pomara5,8.
Abstract
During the last decade, global interest in the multiple benefits of formal peer teaching has increased. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of first-year medical students towards the use of peer teaching to learn anatomy using cadaveric specimens. A descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective survey was carried out. Data were collected using an online questionnaire which was administered to all medical students who were in their second year of their medical school curriculum and who had participated in sessions taught by their peers during their first year. Peer teaching was perceived as an effective method of learning anatomy by more than half of the participants. Analysis of mean responses revealed that the peer teachers created a positive, non-intimidating learning environment. Overall, participants gave positive feedback on their peer teachers. Six categories emerged from the responses given by participants as to why they would or would not recommend peer teaching. Ways of improvement as suggested by the respondents were also reported. Variables found to be significantly associated with the perceived benefits of the peer teaching program included sex differences, educational level and recommendations for peer teaching. This study brings to light the merits and demerits of peer teaching as viewed through the eyes of the peer learners. Peer teaching provides a sound platform for teaching and learning anatomy. Further discussions at higher levels are encouraged in order to explore the feasibility of introducing formal peer teaching in the medical curriculum. Anat Sci Educ 11: 346-357.Entities:
Keywords: anatomy pedagogy; cadaver dissection; gross anatomy education; medical education; medical students; peer assisted learning; peer teaching; undergraduate education
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29112798 DOI: 10.1002/ase.1751
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anat Sci Educ ISSN: 1935-9772 Impact factor: 5.958