| Literature DB >> 29112684 |
Thomas A Werner1, Christina M Forster1, Levent Dizdar1, Pablo E Verde2, Katharina Raba3, Matthias Schott4, Wolfram T Knoefel1, Andreas Krieg1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare and challenging endocrine malignancy. Once spread, the therapeutic options are limited and the outcome poor. For these patients, the identification of new druggable biological markers is of great importance. Here, we investigated the prognostic and biological role of the C-X-C chemokine receptors type 4 and 7 (CXCR4/7) in MTC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29112684 PMCID: PMC5729476 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.364
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Patient characteristics (n=86)
| Total | 86 |
| Median (range); years | 48 (6–83) |
| Male | 42 (49) |
| Female | 44 (51) |
| Sporadic | 40 (47) |
| MEN2A | 38 (44) |
| Unknown | 8 (9) |
| <12 pg ml−1 | 9 (10) |
| >12 pg ml−1 | 58 (68) |
| Unknown | 19 (22) |
| 11 (13) | |
| with unilateral ND | 3 (3) |
| 7 (8) | |
| with bilateral ND | 2 (2) |
| 16 (19) | |
| with unilateral ND | 16 (19) |
| with bilateral ND | 31 (36) |
| Unilateral | 70 (81) |
| Bilateral | 16 (19) |
| T1/2 | 67 (78) |
| T3/4 | 19 (22) |
| N negative | 43 (50) |
| N positive | 43 (50) |
| M0 | 68 (79) |
| M1 | 18 (21) |
| UICC I/II | 41 (48) |
| UICC III/IV | 45 (52) |
Abbreviations: MEN2A= multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A; ND=neck dissection; UICC=Union Internationale Contre le Cancer.
Figure 1Expression of CXCR4 in MTC. (A) Representative tissue samples with immunohistochemical staining for CXCR4 and calcitonin in MTC (left), respective lymph node metastasis (middle) and non-neoplastic thyroid gland (right). All shown samples were classified as a strong expression for the given marker in accordance with the IRS. The bar at the top left corner indicates 50 μm. (B) Expression levels of CXCR4 in non-neoplastic thyroid tissue specimens and respective corresponding MTC, lymph node and distant metastases. Boxplots display the median IRS with the upper and lower quartile, as well as maximum and minimum for CXCR4. CXCR4 expression in the different tissue samples was compared between groups using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. Bars indicate the respective pairs. CXCR4=C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4; DM=distant metastases; IRS=immunoreactivity score; LN=lymph node metastases; MTC=medullary thyroid carcinoma; NT=non-neoplastic thyroid gland; ***P<0.001.
Figure 2Association between CXCR4 expression and different clinicopathological parameters. (A–F) Boxplots display the median IRS with the upper and lower quartile, as well as maximum and minimum for CXCR4 in the primary tumour core grouped according to the given clinicopathological parameter. CXCR4 expression levels were compared using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test. (G) Cox regression analyses demonstrate the correlation between increasing expression levels of CXCR4 and the likelihood of an advanced tumour stage or metastatic phenotype. CXCR4=C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4; IRS=immunoreactivity score; LN=lymph node; *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.
Overall survival analysis
| Age at first diagnosis | 3.740 | 1.477–9.469 | |
| Sex | 1.893 | 0.749–4.785 | 0.178 |
| T1/2 | 3.641 | 1.115–11.89 | |
| N negative | 4.773 | 1.879–12.13 | |
| M0 | 21.45 | 6.304–72.98 | |
| Sporadic | 6.289 | 2.193–18.03 | |
| Calcitonin basal blood level | 3.688 | 0.856–15.89 | 0.080 |
| CXCR4 expression | 4.474 | 1.671–11.98 | |
| Age at first diagnosis | 3.1662 | 0.089–1.116 | 0.074 |
| Sex | 0.953 | 0.328–2.766 | 0.930 |
| T1/2 | 1.074 | 0.360–3.202 | 0.898 |
| N negative | 2.193 | 0.401–11.987 | 0.365 |
| M0 | 2.219 | 0.558–8.823 | 0.258 |
| Sporadic | 4.523 | 0.507–40.300 | 0.176 |
| Calcitonin basal blood level | 0.946 | 0.313–2.860 | 0.922 |
| CXCR4 expression | 1.045 | 0.867–1.261 | 0.643 |
| M0 | 11.47 | 2.941–44.71 | |
Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; CXCR4=C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4; HR=hazard ratio; MEN2A= multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A. The bold values are statistically significant.
Figure 3Expression levels of CXCR4 and CXCR7 in MTC cell line TT. (A) Immunocytochemical staining of CXCR4 and CXCR7 in MTC cell line TT using Alexa Fluor 488 as secondary antibody. DAPI was used for visualisation of the nucleus. Overlays demonstrate the composite images for both staining procedures. Antibody specificity was confirmed with isotype controls (control). Images were captured using a fluorescence microscope at × 400 magnification. Bar at the top left corner indicates 50 μm. (B) Western blot analysis for both CXCR4 and CXCR7 in MTC cell line TT. GAPDH served as loading control. CXCR4/7=C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4/7.
Figure 4rh-SDF1 (A) Representative pictures of matrigel invasion membranes stained with DAPI for nuclear visualisation after treatment of human MTC cell line TT with CXCR4 antagonising compounds AMD3100 and WZ811 as well as chemokine receptor agonist rh-SDF1α. (B) The number of invading cells was estimated by counting cells in five visual fields of at least three separate membranes and illustrated as fold change to control. (C) After treatment with rh-SDF1α, cell cycle analyses were performed using PI staining and FACS. Cell populations are grouped according to the distinct cell cycle phase. (D) Changes in mRNA expression levels of EMT-associated genes were evaluated using qRT–PCR where GAPDH served as housekeeping gene. Fold changes were calculated using the 2−▵▵CT method. All plots display the mean with s.e.m. Numerical data were analysed using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test. CT values are displayed in Supplementary Table 3. Ctrl=vehicle control for the highest concentration; *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.