Literature DB >> 29112561

Nodal Disease in Rectal Cancer Patients With Complete Tumor Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Danger Below Calm Waters.

Rebeccah B Baucom1, Lillias H Maguire, Sandra L Kavalukas, Timothy M Geiger, Molly M Ford, Roberta L Muldoon, M Benjamin Hopkins, Alexander T Hawkins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A subset of patients with rectal cancer who undergo neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy will develop a complete pathologic tumor response. Complete nodal response is not universal in these patients and is difficult to assess clinically. Quantifying the risk of nodal disease would allow for targeted therapy with either radical resection or "watchful waiting."
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify risk factors for residual nodal disease in ypT0 rectal adenocarcinoma.
DESIGN: This is a retrospective case control study. SETTINGS: The National Cancer Database 2006 to 2014 was used to identify patients for this study. PATIENTS: Patients with stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma who completed chemoradiation therapy followed by resection and who had ypT0 tumors were included. Patients with metastatic disease and <2 lymph nodes evaluated were excluded. Patients were divided into 2 groups: node positive and node negative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was nodal disease. The secondary outcome was overall survival.
RESULTS: A total of 42,257 patients with stage II/III rectal cancer underwent chemoradiation therapy and radical resection; 4170 (9.9%) patients had ypT0 tumors and 395 (9.5%) were node positive. Of patients with clinically node-negative disease (ie, pretreatment imaging), 6.2% were node positive after chemoradiation therapy and resection. In multivariable analysis, factors predictive of nodal disease included increasing (pretreatment) clinical N-stage, high tumor grade (3/4), perineural invasion, and lymphovascular invasion. Higher clinical T-stage was inversely associated with residual nodal disease. Overall 5-year survival was significantly different between patients with ypN0, ypN1, and ypN2 disease (87.4%, 82.2%, and 62.5%, p = 0.002). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the lack of clinical detail in the database and the inability to assess recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Ten percent of patients with ypT0 tumors had positive nodes after chemoradiation therapy and resection. Factors associated with residual nodal disease included clinical nodal disease at diagnosis and poor histologic features. Patients with any of these features should consider radical resection regardless of tumor response. Others could be suitable for "watchful waiting" strategies. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A458.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29112561     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  7 in total

1.  Cost analysis of a wait-and-see strategy after radiochemotherapy in distal rectal cancer.

Authors:  Cihan Gani; Ulrich Grosse; Stephan Clasen; Andreas Kirschniak; Martin Goetz; Claus Rödel; Daniel Zips
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  The risk of nodal disease in patients with pathological complete responses after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

Authors:  Ian Jun Yan Wee; Hai Man Cao; James Chi-Yong Ngu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Predictive role of diffusion-weighted MRI in the assessment of response to total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Franco Iafrate; Fabio Ciccarelli; Giorgio Maria Masci; Damiano Grasso; Francesco Marruzzo; Francesca De Felice; Vincenzo Tombolini; Giancarlo D'Ambrosio; Fabio Massimo Magliocca; Enrico Cortesi; Carlo Catalano
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 7.034

4.  Usefulness of close surveillance for rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Yu-Jen Hsu; Yih-Jong Chern; I-Li Lai; Sum-Fu Chiang; Chun-Kai Liao; Wen-Sy Tsai; Hsin-Yuan Hung; Pao-Shiu Hsieh; Chien-Yuh Yeh; Jy-Ming Chiang; Yen-Lin Yu; Jeng-Fu You
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2022-09-05

5.  T-stage downstaging of locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is not associated with reduced recurrence after adjusting for tumour characteristics.

Authors:  Ian P Hayes; Elasma Milanzi; Rachel M Pelly; Peter Gibbs; Jeanette C Reece
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 2.885

6.  Histopathological Analysis of 173 Consecutive Patients with Colorectal Carcinoma: A Pathologist's View.

Authors:  Ceren Canbey Göret; Nuri Emrah Göret
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-09-26

7.  Contemporary snapshot of tumor regression grade (TRG) distribution in locally advanced rectal cancer: a cross sectional multicentric experience.

Authors:  Paola Germani; Francesca Di Candido; Daniel Léonard; Dajana Cuicchi; Ugo Elmore; Marco Ettore Allaix; Vittoria Pia Barbieri; Laura D'Allens; Seraina Faes; Marika Milani; Damiano Caputo; Carmen Martinez; Jan Grosek; Valerio Caracino; Niki Christou; Sapho X Roodbeen; Umberto Bracale; Aurelia Wildeboer; Antonella Usai; Michele Benedetti; Alessandro Balani; Giuseppe Piccinni; Marco Catarci; Paolo Millo; Nicole Bouvy; Francesco Corcione; Roel Hompes; Frédéric Ris; Massimo Basti; Ales Tomazic; Eduardo Targarona; Alessandro Coppola; Andrea Pietrabissa; Dieter Hahnloser; Michel Adamina; Massimo Viola; Mario Morino; Riccardo Rosati; Gilberto Poggioli; Alex Kartheuser; Antonino Spinelli; Nicolò de Manzini
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-04-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.