Literature DB >> 2911218

Practice changes in response to the malpractice litigation climate. Results of a Maryland physician survey.

C S Weisman1, L L Morlock, M A Teitelbaum, A C Klassen, D D Celentano.   

Abstract

Data from a 1987 survey of Maryland physicians in three specialties (internal medicine, family or general practice, and obstetrics-gynecology) were used to study the types of changes physicians have made in their practices during the last 2 years as a result of the current malpractice litigation climate. Overall, 51% reported making some type of practice change. The practice changes that physicians reported reflect both risk-reduction (e.g., increased use of tests) and risk-avoidance (e.g., cutting back high-risk patients) strategies, although risk-reduction actions were reported more frequently. Raising patient fees was also reported. Specialty predicts whether or not physicians make each type of change; in particular, obstetrician-gynecologists are more likely to report practice changes of all types. Prior litigation experience does not, in general, predict practice changes. The implications of the types of changes reported for access to care and costs of care were considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2911218     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198901000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  5 in total

Review 1.  Act first and look up the law afterward?: medical malpractice and the ethics of defensive medicine.

Authors:  K De Ville
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1998-12

2.  Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Stephen H Taplin; William E Barlow; Gary R Cutter; Carl J D'Orsi; R Edward Hendrick; Linn A Abraham; Jessica S Fosse; Patricia A Carney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: which interventions are effective?

Authors:  M Wensing; T van der Weijden; R Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Effect of medicolegal liability on patterns of general and family practice in Canada.

Authors:  C A Woodward; W Rosser
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Connie Y Nakano; Thomas D Koepsell; Laurel M Desnick; Carl J D'Orsi; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 13.506

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.