Literature DB >> 2911205

Comparative trial of cytarabine and thioguanine in combination with amsacrine or daunorubicin in patients with untreated acute nonlymphocytic leukemia: results of the L-16M protocol.

E Berman1, Z A Arlin, J Gaynor, W Miller, T Gee, S J Kempin, R Mertelsmann, M Andreeff, L Reich, N Nahmias.   

Abstract

Ninety-six patients with de novo acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) were randomized to receive either daunorubicin (50 mg/m2, IV) on days 1-3; cytarabine (Ara-C) (25 mg/m2, IV) bolus, followed by 160 mg/m2 as a continuous IV infusion daily for 5 days and 6-thioguanine (6-TG) (100 mg/m2 po) every 12 hr daily for 5 days (DAT); or amsacrine (190 mg/m2, IV) on days 1-3 with Ara-C and 6-TG at the above doses (AAT). Patients achieving complete remission (CR) then received two courses of consolidation therapy with the same combination that had induced remission but at slightly reduced total doses. Patients less than or equal to age 40 with an HLA-identical sibling donor underwent allogeneic transplantation, usually after consolidation therapy. The remaining patients were then randomized to receive either maintenance therapy (alternating cycles of vincristine/methotrexate, cyclophosphamide/6-TG, daunorubicin/hydroxyurea and Ara-C/6-TG) or no further treatment. Ninety-two patients were evaluable for response. Twenty-five of the 46 patients (54%) who received DAT and 32 of the 46 patients (70%) who received AAT achieved CR (p = 0.13). When patients were stratified by age, however, remission induction advantage with AAT became statistically significant (p = 0.03). Additionally, more patients achieved CR following one course of AAT than following one course of DAT (48% vs 28%, p = 0.03). Overall survival in the AAT group was improved as well (p = 0.01). Too few patients were randomized on the maintenance arm of the protocol to make interpretation meaningful. Non-hematologic toxicity was generally comparable in both arms. In conclusion, patients with de novo ANLL who received AAT had a higher remission incidence and slightly longer survival compared to patients who received DAT. Further investigation of this drug combination in untreated patients with ANLL is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2911205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  7 in total

Review 1.  The role of timed sequential chemotherapy in adult acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Xavier Thomas
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.952

2.  Treatment of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a Canadian consensus.

Authors:  Joseph M Brandwein; Michelle Geddes; Jeannine Kassis; Andrea K Kew; Brian Leber; Thomas Nevill; Mitchell Sabloff; Irwindeep Sandhu; Andre C Schuh; John M Storring; John Ashkenas
Journal:  Am J Blood Res       Date:  2013-05-05

Review 3.  Treatment concepts for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Wolfgang R Sperr; Alexander W Hauswirth; Friedrich Wimazal; Paul Knöbl; Klaus Geissler; Peter Valent
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Five-day 4'-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulphon-m-anisidide and intermediate-dose cytosine arabinoside in high-risk relapsing or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  M Freund; S Giller; F Hinrichs; A Baars; J Meran; A Körfer; H Link; H Poliwoda
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Anthracycline dose intensification in young adults with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Eric Padron; Hugo Fernandez
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2012-02

6.  miR-181a modulates acute myeloid leukemia susceptibility to natural killer cells.

Authors:  Arash Nanbakhsh; Géraldine Visentin; Daniel Olive; Bassam Janji; Eugenie Mussard; Philippe Dessen; Guillaume Meurice; Yanyan Zhang; Fawzia Louache; Jean-Henri Bourhis; Salem Chouaib
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 8.110

7.  A single dose of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim for supporting neutrophil recovery in patients treated for low-to-intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Jorge Sierra; Jeffrey Szer; Jeannine Kassis; Richard Herrmann; Mario Lazzarino; Xavier Thomas; Stephen J Noga; Nigel Baker; Roger Dansey; Alberto Bosi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 4.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.