BACKGROUND: Associations have been observed between an aggregate viral load measure, the community viral load, and new HIV diagnoses. The community viral load aggregates viral loads within chosen geographic areas, restricting inferences about HIV acquisition risk to these areas. We develop a more precise metric, the network viral load (NVL), to measure the composite viral load within a risk network of a HIV-negative individual. METHODS: We examined the relationship between NVL and HIV infection among young men who have sex with men in Chicago, United States. Networks were generated using respondent-driven sampling. NVL was defined as the prevalence of viremic individuals in one's risk network, characterized as those with a viral load ≥20 k copies per milliliter. Permutation tests were conducted to account for dependency. RESULTS: After controlling for total connections, age, substance use during sex, syphilis diagnosis (previous 12 months), and frequency of condomless anal sex (previous 6 months), we found a positive association between NVL and HIV infection. Compared with a network with all HIV-seronegative members, the odds of HIV infection with an NVL of <10% viremia were 1.85 (95% confidence interval: 1.18 to 2.92) times higher and those with an NVL of ≥10% viremia were 2.73 (95% confidence interval: 1.54 to 4.85) times higher. CONCLUSIONS: We found a positive association between NVL and HIV seroprevalence. Although limited in its ability to infer causality, NVL could have substantial public health implications for persons most at risk for HIV infection, given that this novel metric avoids overreliance on individual level behavior or broad community indices.
BACKGROUND: Associations have been observed between an aggregate viral load measure, the community viral load, and new HIV diagnoses. The community viral load aggregates viral loads within chosen geographic areas, restricting inferences about HIV acquisition risk to these areas. We develop a more precise metric, the network viral load (NVL), to measure the composite viral load within a risk network of a HIV-negative individual. METHODS: We examined the relationship between NVL and HIV infection among young men who have sex with men in Chicago, United States. Networks were generated using respondent-driven sampling. NVL was defined as the prevalence of viremic individuals in one's risk network, characterized as those with a viral load ≥20 k copies per milliliter. Permutation tests were conducted to account for dependency. RESULTS: After controlling for total connections, age, substance use during sex, syphilis diagnosis (previous 12 months), and frequency of condomless anal sex (previous 6 months), we found a positive association between NVL and HIV infection. Compared with a network with all HIV-seronegative members, the odds of HIV infection with an NVL of <10% viremia were 1.85 (95% confidence interval: 1.18 to 2.92) times higher and those with an NVL of ≥10% viremia were 2.73 (95% confidence interval: 1.54 to 4.85) times higher. CONCLUSIONS: We found a positive association between NVL and HIV seroprevalence. Although limited in its ability to infer causality, NVL could have substantial public health implications for persons most at risk for HIV infection, given that this novel metric avoids overreliance on individual level behavior or broad community indices.
Authors: Peter L Anderson; David V Glidden; Albert Liu; Susan Buchbinder; Javier R Lama; Juan Vicente Guanira; Vanessa McMahan; Lane R Bushman; Martín Casapía; Orlando Montoya-Herrera; Valdilea G Veloso; Kenneth H Mayer; Suwat Chariyalertsak; Mauro Schechter; Linda-Gail Bekker; Esper Georges Kallás; Robert M Grant Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Steffanie A Strathdee; Timothy B Hallett; Natalia Bobrova; Tim Rhodes; Robert Booth; Reychad Abdool; Catherine A Hankins Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-07-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Moupali Das; Priscilla Lee Chu; Glenn-Milo Santos; Susan Scheer; Eric Vittinghoff; Willi McFarland; Grant N Colfax Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: John A Schneider; Benjamin Cornwell; David Ostrow; Stuart Michaels; Phil Schumm; Edward O Laumann; Samuel Friedman Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Matthew R Golden; Matthew Hogben; H Hunter Handsfield; Janet S St Lawrence; John J Potterat; King K Holmes Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Ann M Dennis; Wendy Murillo; Flor de Maria Hernandez; Maria Elena Guardado; Ana Isabel Nieto; Ivette Lorenzana de Rivera; Joseph J Eron; Gabriela Paz-Bailey Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Mary S Campbell; James I Mullins; James P Hughes; Connie Celum; Kim G Wong; Dana N Raugi; Stefanie Sorensen; Julia N Stoddard; Hong Zhao; Wenjie Deng; Erin Kahle; Dana Panteleeff; Jared M Baeten; Francine E McCutchan; Jan Albert; Thomas Leitner; Anna Wald; Lawrence Corey; Jairam R Lingappa Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-03-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Susan J Little; Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; Christy M Anderson; Jason A Young; Joel O Wertheim; Sanjay R Mehta; Susanne May; Davey M Smith Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Samuel R Friedman; Pedro Mateu-Gelabert; Georgios K Nikolopoulos; Magdalena Cerdá; Diana Rossi; Ashly E Jordan; Tarlise Townsend; Maria R Khan; David C Perlman Journal: Glob Public Health Date: 2021-04-11
Authors: Dustin T Duncan; DeMarc A Hickson; William C Goedel; Denton Callander; Brandon Brooks; Yen-Tyng Chen; Hillary Hanson; Rebecca Eavou; Aditya S Khanna; Basile Chaix; Seann D Regan; Darrell P Wheeler; Kenneth H Mayer; Steven A Safren; Sandra Carr Melvin; Cordarian Draper; Veronica Magee-Jackson; Russell Brewer; John A Schneider Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 3.390