| Literature DB >> 29111563 |
Cláudia Carolina Silva Evangelista1,2, Giovanna Vieira Guidelli1, Gustavo Borges1, Thais Fenz Araujo1, Tiago Alves Jorge de Souza1,2, Ubiraci Pereira da Costa Neves3, Alan Tunnacliffe4, Tiago Campos Pereira1,2.
Abstract
The molecular basis of anhydrobiosis, the state of suspended animation entered by some species during extreme desiccation, is still poorly understood despite a number of transcriptome and proteome studies. We therefore conducted functional screening by RNA interference (RNAi) for genes involved in anhydrobiosis in the holo-anhydrobiotic nematode Panagrolaimus superbus. A new method of survival analysis, based on staining, and proof-of-principle RNAi experiments confirmed a role for genes involved in oxidative stress tolerance, while a novel medium-scale RNAi workflow identified a further 40 anhydrobiosis-associated genes, including several involved in proteostasis, DNA repair and signal transduction pathways. This suggests that multiple genes contribute to anhydrobiosis in P. superbus.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29111563 PMCID: PMC5738622 DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2017-0030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Mol Biol ISSN: 1415-4757 Impact factor: 1.771
Functional identification of anhydrobiosis-related genes via RNAi. All the 40 genes whose knockdown lead to statistically significant decreases in survival percentage ≤10% compared to control group (i.e., worms soaked with RNA duplexes against GFP, normalized as 100% survival) are listed here in gray. Nine genes (marked with asterisks) presented statistically significant decreases lower than 10% (One-Way ANOVA). The remaining 48 targets that did not lead to statistically significant reductions in the initial screenings and are listed in white.
| Target Code | Target identity |
|---|---|
| 1K | putative serine threonine-protein kinase (7e-25) |
| 2K | Cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase |
| 3K | Casein kinase II regulatory subunit |
| 4K | Protein kinase |
| 5K | casein kinase I isoform gamma-1 (9e-19) |
| 6K | C2 domain containing protein (4e-62); CBR-FER-1 protein (2e-46); myoferlin (8e-20) |
| 7K | TKL/LISK/TESK protein kinase (2e-64) |
| 8K | diacylglycerol kinase (5e-83) |
| 9K | PREDICTED: serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek6-like (1e-62) |
| 10K | CK1/WORM6 protein kinase (2e-141) |
| 11K | SH3-domain kinase binding protein |
| 12K | Serine/threonine-protein kinase |
| 13K | testis-specific serine threonine-protein kinase 2 (5e-58) |
| 15K | malonyl-acyl carrier protein (2e-22). ADP-specific phosphofructokinase/glucokinase conserved region family protein (5e-22) |
| 16K | serine threonine protein kinase-related domain containing protein (4e-49) |
| 17K | putative tyrosine-protein kinase kin-31 (6e-83); SH2 motif and tyrosine protein kinase and protein of unknown function DUF595 domain containing protein (5e-81) |
| 18K | gastrulation defective protein 1 (9e-54); protein kinase domain containing protein (6e-50) |
| 19K | adenylate kinase 1 (6e-28) |
| 20K | serine threonine-protein kinase pelle (1e-58); CBR-PIK-1 protein (1e-57) |
| 21K | Er (fms/fps related) protein kinase |
| 22K | Cyclin-dependent kinases regulatory subunit |
| 23K | Guanylate kinase family protein |
| 24K | protein MAK-1, isoform c (7e-11) |
| 26K | Protein kinase domain containing protein |
| 27K | CAMK/CAMKL/MELK protein kinase (2e-27) |
| 28K | serine threonine-protein kinase akt-1 (3e-90) |
| 33K | putative tyrosine-protein kinase kin-31 (1e-12) |
| 34K | protein kinase domain-containing protein (7e-78); casein kinase I isoform gamma-1 (3e-76) |
| 36K | TK/FER protein kinase (5e-61) |
| 37K | tyrosine-protein kinase fer (1e-47) |
| 38K | CK1/TTBKL protein kinase (7e-48) |
| 39K | serine threonine protein kinase-related domain containing protein (6e-53) |
| 40K | PLK/PLK1 protein kinase (5e-51) |
| si23 | Pinin/SDK/memA/ protein conserved region containing protein |
| si24* | glutamate dehydrogenase (1e-06) |
| si25 | cathepsin L-like cysteine proteinase (4e-150) |
| si26 | A - heat shock protein 70 |
| si27/28 | B/C - Heat shock 70 kDa protein |
| si29 | Ras-related protein Rab-1A |
| si30 | Ras-related protein Rab-11B |
| si31 | cuticle collagen protein LON-3 (3e-27) |
| si32 | CBR-RPS-0 protein (40S ribosomal protein AS) (9e-29) |
| si33 | Immunodominant antigen Ov33-3 / Pepsin inhibitor Dit33 |
| si34 | Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme H1 |
| si35* | histone H2B 2 (7e-53) |
| si36 | cytochrome P450 like_TBP (3e-29) |
| si37 | CRE-RPL-9 protein |
| si38 | ribosomal protein L44 (4e-30) |
| si39 | A - euk. Transl. Elong. factor 1A |
| si40 | B - euk. Transl. Elong. factor 1A |
| si41 | Elongation factor 1 beta |
| si42 | DNA repair protein RAD51 homolog 1 (4e-110) |
| si43 | Pv-hsp60 |
| si44 | Pv-p23 |
| si45 | putative heat shock protein 90 (2e-143) |
| si46 | 60S ribosomal protein L4 (1e-147) |
| si47 | 40S ribosomal protein S8 (2e-71) |
| si48 | 60S ribosomal protein L7a (3e-120) |
| si76 | oxidoreductase, aldo/keto reductase family protein (8e-77) |
| si77 | zinc finger domain containing protein (8e-39) (AN1-like Zinc finger, 7e-37) |
| si78 | channel protein, MIP family (3e-74); aquaporin (3e-69) |
| si79 | autophagy-related protein 2-like protein A (1e-14) |
| si80 | peptidyl-prolyl |
| si81* | chaperonin Cpn60 TCP-1 domain containing protein (3e-63) |
| si82 | Derlin-2 |
| si83 | DJ-1 |
| si84 | Ezrin Radixin Moesin family member (erm-1) |
| si85 | HSP70 cochaperone BAG1 |
| si86 | LC3, GABARAP and GATE-16 family member (lgg-1) |
| si87* | ATP-dependent protease La (1e-75); lon protease homolog, mitochondrial precursor (7e-74) |
| si88* | isocitrate dehydrogenase, NADP-dependent (7e-102) |
| si89* | prefoldin subunit 2, PFD-2 (3e-10) |
| si90 | Probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase |
| si91 | Proteasome subunit alpha type 4 |
| si92* | CRE-PBS-1 protein (5e-52); proteasome domain containing protein (2e-50) |
| si93 | Protein disulfide isomerase |
| si94 | RIC1 Putative stress responsive protein |
| si95 | Small heat shock proteinalpha crystallin family |
| si96 | tetratricopeptide TPR-1 domain containing protein (3e-43); hsp70-interacting protein, putative (1e-23) |
| si97 | THaumatiN family member |
| si98 | Ubiquitin conjugating enzyme (E2) family member (ubc-3) |
| si99* | ubiquitin (2e-112) |
| si100* | ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1 (4e-68) |
| 1 | Novel protein (PREDICTED: 1 2-dihydroxy-3-keto-5-methylthiopentene dioxygenase-like) |
| 2 | (Lamin Receptor / ribosomal Protein AS) |
| 3 | Large subunit ribosomal protein 23 |
| 4 | Proteasome 26S subunit subunit 4 ATPase |
| 6 | Sterol carrier protein |
| 7 | Aspartyl protease protein 6 |
| 8 | Thymidylate synthase |
| 9 | ATP synthase subunit family member |
| 10 | ADP/ATP translocase |
| 11 | Bi-functional glyoxylate cycle protein |
| 15 | 40S ribosomal protein S12 |
| 16 | Proteosome subunit alpha |
| 17 | Glutathione s-transferase |
| 21 | Heat shock protein |
Figure 1Involvement of peroxiredoxin and glutathione peroxidase in anhydrobiosis in P. superbus. A) Molecular analysis by semi-quantitative RT-PCR revealed an average reduction of 71% of PER RNA transcripts and 61% of GP114 in worms subjected to RNAi by feeding compared to the control group corresponding to worms fed with bacteria expressing dsRNA against GFP gene, which is not associated with anhydrobiosis (* p ≤ 0.05, one-way ANOVA). B) Viability tests before desiccation. Average survival percentages obtained for different treatments. Groups did not statistically differ and remained above 95% survival. C) Survival tests after extreme desiccation. Silencing PER promoted a 66% reduction in survival percentage when compared to control group; GP114 promoted a 21% reduction (* p≤0.05; one-way ANOVA).
Figure 2PER and GP114 enzymes combat oxidative stress. Statistically significant decreases in survival percentages were observed in both treatments (glutathione peroxidase- and peroxiredoxin-silenced worms) exposed to hydrogen peroxide. (* p<0.05; t-test between control group (GFP) and corresponding experimental group).
Figure 3Molecular confirmation of gene knockdown by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. Three targets were selected to confirm gene silencing by soaking with dicer substrates, two of which lead to a decrease in survival after desiccation (si46 and si76) and one of which did not (si86). * p<0.05 (Tukey, compared to control group).
Figure 4Identification of anhydrobiosis-related genes in P. superbus. All the 40 genes here indicated lead to statistically significant reductions >10% in survival percentage (z-test, p<0.05 compared to control group) after knockdown and desiccation.