Literature DB >> 29111443

Derivation of endogenous equivalent values to support risk assessment and risk management decisions for an endogenous carcinogen: Ethylene oxide.

C R Kirman1, S M Hays2.   

Abstract

An approach is presented for ethylene oxide (EO) to derive endogenous equivalent (EE) values, which are endogenous levels normally found within the body expressed in terms of exogenous exposures. EE values can be used to support risk assessment and risk management decisions for chemicals such as EO that have both endogenous and exogenous exposure pathways. EE values were derived using a meta-analysis of data from the published literature characterizing the distribution for an EO biomarker of exposure, hemoglobin N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-valine (HEV), in unexposed populations. These levels are compared to the those reported in exposed populations (smokers, workers). Correlation between the biomarker of exposure and external exposures of EO were applied to this distribution to determine corresponding EE values, which range from 0.13 to 6.9 ppb for EO in air. These values are orders of magnitude higher than risk-based concentration values derived for EO using default methods, and are provided as a pragmatic, data-driven alternative approach to managing the potential risks from exogenous exposures to EO.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers of exposure; Endogenous exposure; Ethylene oxide; Point of departure; Risk assessment; Risk management

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29111443     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.10.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  4 in total

Review 1.  The role of endogenous versus exogenous sources in the exposome of putative genotoxins and consequences for risk assessment.

Authors:  Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Arand Michael; Hermann M Bolt; Bourdoux Siméon; Hartwig Andrea; Hinrichsen Nils; Kalisch Christine; Mally Angela; Pellegrino Gloria; Ribera Daniel; Thatcher Natalie; Eisenbrand Gerhard
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 6.168

Review 2.  Ethylene Oxide: Cancer Evidence Integration and Dose-Response Implications.

Authors:  Melissa J Vincent; Jordan S Kozal; William J Thompson; Andrew Maier; G Scott Dotson; Elizabeth A Best; Kenneth A Mundt
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Ethylene Oxide Exposure in U.S. Populations Residing Near Sterilization and Other Industrial Facilities: Context Based on Endogenous and Total Equivalent Concentration Exposures.

Authors:  Patrick J Sheehan; Ryan C Lewis; Christopher R Kirman; Heather N Watson; Eric D Winegar; James S Bus
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Monitored and Modeled Ambient Air Concentrations of Ethylene Oxide: Contextualizing Health Risk for Potentially Exposed Populations in Georgia.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Patrick J Sheehan; Christopher G DesAutels; Heather N Watson; Christopher R Kirman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.