| Literature DB >> 29109961 |
Ning Yuan1,2, Lili Jia3, Zhen Geng3, Renfeng Wang2, Zhaoyang Li3, Xianjin Yang3, Zhenduo Cui3, Shengli Zhu3, Yanqin Liang3, Yunde Liu2.
Abstract
Orthopedic implant failure is mainly attributed to the poor bonding of the implant to bone tissue. An effecEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29109961 PMCID: PMC5646307 DOI: 10.1155/2017/9867819
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1(a) Schematic illustration of the preparation process of Sr-incorporated alginate coating on titanium surface. (b) The molecular formula of Sr-incorporated alginate coating on titanium surface.
Figure 2SEM images of the coatings: (a) Ti, (b) Ti/DOPA, (c) Ti/DOPA/SA, (d) Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr1, (e) Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr5, and (f) partially enlarged view of Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr5 (scale bars: 10 μm).
Figure 3FT-IR spectra of the coatings: (a) Ti, (b) Ti/DOPA, (c) Ti/DOPA/SA, (d) Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr1, and (e) Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr5.
Figure 4XPS spectra of the coatings: (a) Ti, (b) Ti/DOPA, (c) Ti/DOPA/SA, (d) Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr1, and (e) Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr5.
Elemental composition at the surface of pristine and functionalized Ti substrates as determined by XPS.
| Substrate | C% | O% | Ti% | N% | Sr% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ti | 42.6 ± 0.46 | 41.8 ± 0.57 | 15.6 ± 0.74 | — | — |
| Ti/DOPA | 63.7 ± 0.58 | 21.5 ± 0.49 | 8.7 ± 0.68 | 6.1 ± 0.56 | — |
| Ti/DOPA/SA | 66.5 ± 0.23 | 24.7 ± 0.28 | 2.0 ± 0.78 | 6.8 ± 0.50 | — |
| Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr1 | 66.0 ± 0.48 | 24.5 ± 0.72 | 2.1 ± 0.38 | 4.8 ± 0.39 | 2.6 ± 0.82 |
| Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr5 | 64.6 ± 0.39 | 23.6 ± 0.61 | 1.7 ± 0.45 | 4.6 ± 0.51 | 5.5 ± 0.76 |
Figure 5Water contact angles measured on various coatings.
Figure 6(a) Cumulative Sr2+ concentration of Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr1 and Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr5 as a function of time; (b) the Sr2+ release efficiency of Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr1 and Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr5 as a function of time.
Figure 7SEM images of cells after 6 h and 12 h of culture on different samples: (a, b) Ti, (c, d) Ti/DOPA, (e, f) Ti/DOPA/SA, (g, h) Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr1, and (i, k) Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr5 (scale bars: 100 μm); (a1, b1) Ti, (c1, d1) Ti/DOPA, (e1, f1) Ti/DOPA/SA, (g1, h1) Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr1, and (i1, k1) Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr5 (scale bars: 50 μm).
Figure 8Cell viability of MG63 cells cultured for different periods of time on Ti, Ti/DOPA, Ti/DOPA/SA, Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr1, and Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr5 (p < 0.05 compared with Ti; p < 0.01 compared with Ti).
Figure 9MG63 cells adhesion and distribution after 1 day of incubation. (a, f) Ti, (b, g) Ti/DOPA, (c, h) Ti/DOPA/SA, (d, i) Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr1, and (e, j) Ti/DOPA/SA/Sr5 ((a–e: magnified 40 times); (f–j: magnified 100 times)). (k) Cell proliferation measured by counting under a fluorescence microscope after 1, 3, and 7 days of incubation. (l) ALP activity of MG63 cells after 3, 7, and 14 days of incubation. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01).