Literature DB >> 29109592

Nanomaterial-based biosensors for detection of prostate specific antigen.

Dominika Damborska1, Tomas Bertok1, Erika Dosekova1, Alena Holazova1, Lenka Lorencova1, Peter Kasak2, Jan Tkac1.   

Abstract

Screening serum for the presence of prostate specific antigen (PSA) belongs to the most common approach for the detection of prostate cancer. This review (with 156 refs.) addresses recent developments in PSA detection based on the use of various kinds of nanomaterials. It starts with an introduction into the field, the significance of testing for PSA, and on current limitations. A first main section treats electrochemical biosensors for PSA, with subsections on methods based on the use of gold electrodes, graphene or graphene-oxide, carbon nanotubes, hybrid nanoparticles, and other types of nanoparticles. It also covers electrochemical methods based on the enzyme-like activity of PSA, on DNA-, aptamer- and biofuel cell-based methods, and on the detection of PSA via its glycan part. The next main section covers optical biosensors, with subsections on methods making use of surface plasmon resonance (SPR), localized SPR and plasmonic ELISA-like schemes. This is followed by subsections on methods based on the use of fiber optics, fluorescence, chemiluminescence, Raman scattering and SERS, electrochemiluminescence and cantilever-based methods. The most sensitive biosensors are the electrochemical ones, with lowest limits of detection (down to attomolar concentrations), followed by mass cantilever sensing and electrochemilumenescent strategies. Optical biosensors show lower performance, but are still more sensitive compared to standard ELISA. The most commonly applied nanomaterials are metal and carbon-based ones and their hybrid composites used for different amplification strategies. The most attractive sensing schemes are summarized in a Table. The review ends with a section on conclusions and perspectives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biochip; Biomarker; Cantilever; Electroanalysis; Electrochemiluminescence; Nanomaterial; Nanotechnology; Optical Assays; PSA; Prostate Cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29109592      PMCID: PMC5669453          DOI: 10.1007/s00604-017-2410-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mikrochim Acta        ISSN: 0026-3672            Impact factor:   5.833


  112 in total

Review 1.  The new human tissue kallikrein gene family: structure, function, and association to disease.

Authors:  G M Yousef; E P Diamandis
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 2.  Surface plasmon resonance-based immunoassays.

Authors:  W M Mullett; E P Lai; J M Yeung
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films.

Authors:  K S Novoselov; A K Geim; S V Morozov; D Jiang; Y Zhang; S V Dubonos; I V Grigorieva; A A Firsov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Terahertz response of a microfabricated rod-split-ring-resonator electromagnetic metamaterial.

Authors:  H O Moser; B D F Casse; O Wilhelmi; B T Saw
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Surface acoustic wave biosensors: a review.

Authors:  Kerstin Länge; Bastian E Rapp; Michael Rapp
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 6.  SERS as a bioassay platform: fundamentals, design, and applications.

Authors:  Marc D Porter; Robert J Lipert; Lorraine M Siperko; Gufeng Wang; Radha Narayanan
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 54.564

7.  Free/total PSA ratio is a powerful predictor of future prostate cancer morbidity in men with initial PSA levels of 4.1 to 10.0 ng/mL.

Authors:  Kazuto Ito; Takumi Yamamoto; Masaru Ohi; Kohei Kurokawa; Kazuhiro Suzuki; Hidetoshi Yamanaka
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  Prostate specific antigen: a critical assessment of the most useful tumor marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  J E Oesterling
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Prostate carcinoma presentation, diagnosis, and staging: an update form the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  David C Miller; Khaled S Hafez; Andrew Stewart; James E Montie; John T Wei
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Surface plasmon resonance detection using antibody-linked magnetic nanoparticles for analyte capture, purification, concentration, and signal amplification.

Authors:  Scott D Soelberg; Richard C Stevens; Ajit P Limaye; Clement E Furlong
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 6.986

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Electrochemical sensors and biosensors based on the use of polyaniline and its nanocomposites: a review on recent advances.

Authors:  Nahid Shoaie; Maryam Daneshpour; Mostafa Azimzadeh; Sara Mahshid; Seyyed Mehdi Khoshfetrat; Fatemeh Jahanpeyma; Alieh Gholaminejad; Kobra Omidfar; Mehdi Foruzandeh
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 5.833

Review 2.  Prostate-specific antigen glycoprofiling as diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jan Tkac; Veronika Gajdosova; Stefania Hroncekova; Tomas Bertok; Michal Hires; Eduard Jane; Lenka Lorencova; Peter Kasak
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  Electrochemical prostate specific antigen aptasensor based on hemin functionalized graphene-conjugated palladium nanocomposites.

Authors:  Guojuan Zhang; Zhiguang Liu; Lifang Fan; Yujing Guo
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 5.833

4.  An integrated magnetic microfluidic chip for rapid immunodetection of the prostate specific antigen using immunomagnetic beads.

Authors:  Zhu Feng; Shaotao Zhi; Lei Guo; Yong Zhou; Chong Lei
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 5.833

5.  An electrochemical immunosensor for the prostate specific antigen based on the use of reduced graphene oxide decorated with gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  Parnaz Assari; Amir Abbas Rafati; Azizallah Feizollahi; Roghayeh Asadpour Joghani
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 5.833

6.  Glycomics of prostate cancer: updates.

Authors:  Jan Tkac; Tomas Bertok; Michal Hires; Eduard Jane; Lenka Lorencova; Peter Kasak
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.940

Review 7.  Carbon Based Nanodots in Early Diagnosis of Cancer.

Authors:  Gurpal Singh; Harinder Kaur; Akanksha Sharma; Joga Singh; Hema Kumari Alajangi; Santosh Kumar; Neha Singla; Indu Pal Kaur; Ravi Pratap Barnwal
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 5.221

8.  Advanced impedimetric biosensor configuration and assay protocol for glycoprofiling of a prostate oncomarker using Au nanoshells with a magnetic core.

Authors:  Tomas Bertok; Lenka Lorencova; Stefania Hroncekova; Veronika Gajdosova; Eduard Jane; Michal Hires; Peter Kasak; Ondrej Kaman; Roman Sokol; Vladimir Bella; Anita Andicsova Eckstein; Jaroslav Mosnacek; Alica Vikartovska; Jan Tkac
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 12.545

9.  A Graphene-Based Glycan Biosensor for Electrochemical Label-Free Detection of a Tumor-Associated Antibody.

Authors:  Filip Kveton; Anna Blsakova; Lenka Lorencova; Monika Jerigova; Dusan Velic; Ola Blixt; Bo Jansson; Peter Kasak; Jan Tkac
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Full-length antibodies versus single-chain antibody fragments for a selective impedimetric lectin-based glycoprofiling of prostate specific antigen.

Authors:  Stefan Belicky; Pavel Damborsky; Julia Zapatero-Rodríguez; Richard O'Kennedy; Jan Tkac
Journal:  Electrochim Acta       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 6.901

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.