Literature DB >> 29109471

The meaning of intragenomic conflict.

Andy Gardner1, Francisco Úbeda2.   

Abstract

Recent years have seen an explosion of interest in genes that function for their own good and to the detriment of other genes that reside in the same genome. Such intragenomic conflicts are increasingly recognized to underpin maladaptation and disease. However, progress has been impeded by a lack of clear understanding regarding what intragenomic conflict actually means, and an associated obscurity concerning its fundamental drivers. Here we develop a general theory of intragenomic conflict in which genes are viewed as inclusive-fitness-maximizing agents that come into conflict when their inclusive-fitness interests disagree. This yields a classification of all intragenomic conflicts into three categories according to whether genes disagree about where they have come from, where they are going, or where they currently are. We illustrate each of these three basic categories, survey and classify all known forms of intragenomic conflict, and discuss the implications for organismal maladaptation and human disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29109471     DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0354-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2397-334X            Impact factor:   15.460


  16 in total

1.  Intragenomic conflict over bet-hedging.

Authors:  Jon F Wilkins; Tanmoy Bhattacharya
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Antagonistic interactions subdue inter-species green-beard cooperation in bacteria.

Authors:  Santosh Sathe; Rolf Kümmerli
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  Adaptation is maintained by the parliament of genes.

Authors:  Thomas W Scott; Stuart A West
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  How does epigenetics influence the course of evolution?

Authors:  Alyson Ashe; Vincent Colot; Benjamin P Oldroyd
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 6.671

5.  Intragroup and intragenomic conflict over chemical defense against predators.

Authors:  Rebekah Best; Graeme D Ruxton; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 6.  The tempo of human childhood: a maternal foot on the accelerator, a paternal foot on the brake.

Authors:  Jennifer Kotler; David Haig
Journal:  Evol Anthropol       Date:  2018-03-25

Review 7.  Selfish genetic elements.

Authors:  J Arvid Ågren; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Inclusive fitness is an indispensable approximation for understanding organismal design.

Authors:  Samuel R Levin; Alan Grafen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  The social evolution of sleep: sex differences, intragenomic conflicts and clinical pathologies.

Authors:  Gonçalo S Faria; Susana A M Varela; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  On the Population Dynamics of Junk: A Review on the Population Genomics of Transposable Elements.

Authors:  Yann Bourgeois; Stéphane Boissinot
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.