Literature DB >> 29109462

Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography for Characterization of Atherosclerosis with a 1.7 Micron Swept-Source Laser.

Yan Li1,2, Joseph Jing1,2, Emon Heidari1,2, Jiang Zhu1, Yueqiao Qu1,2, Zhongping Chen3,4.   

Abstract

The main cause of acute coronary events, such as thrombosis, is the rupture of atherosclerotic plaques. Typical intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT) imaging systems that utilize a 1.3 μm swept source laser are often used for identifying fibrous cap thickness of plaques, yet cannot provide adequate depth penetration to resolve the size of the lipid pool. Here, we present a novel  IVOCT system with a 1.7 μm center wavelength swept light source that can readily penetrate deeper into the tissue because of the longer wavelength and allows for better identification of plaques due to the lipid absorption spectrum at 1.7 μm. Using this system, we have imaged a human coronary artery to evaluate the performance of the novel OCT system and verified the results by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) histology. The significantly improved imaging depth and better identification sensitivity suggest that the 1.7 μm OCT system holds great potential  that can be further translated for in-vivo applications of atherosclerosis characterization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29109462      PMCID: PMC5674044          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-15326-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Coronary artery disease is the most common type of heart disease in developed countries with high mortality caused by ruptured atherosclerotic plaques. Accurate assessment of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques is essential for choosing proper interventional techniques. According to prior clinical studies, there are three characteristics of vulnerable plaques that are used as the criteria to estimate whether the plaque is vulnerable: (i) a large lipid pool, (ii) thin fibrous cap, and (iii) major inflammatory reaction[1-4]. Various imaging technologies, such as intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and a combined multimodality imaging system, have been developed to detect vulnerable plaques with the hope of guiding therapy and monitoring response to intervention[5-10]. IVOCT, the latest development in intravascular coronary imaging, offers cross-sectional images of human arteries with a superior spatial resolution of ~15 μm that enables the detection of micrometer-scale features of atherosclerosis such as the intimal cap layers associated with vulnerable plaques[11-14]. In the clinic, the IVOCT system based on a swept source laser with a center wavelength of 1.3 μm is often used for identifying the thin fibrous cap[6]. However, limited by the depth penetration of the typical IVOCT system, it is difficult to visualize the large lipid pool. Therefore, IVUS with an imaging depth of ~7 mm and a resolution of ~150 μm is utilized to image both the lumen geometry and structure of the arterial wall that may contain large lipid pools[10,15,16]. The IVOCT system with a center wavelength at 1.7 μm has several advantages compared to the IVOCT system at 1.3 μm. First, the contrast between lipid and normal tissue will be more obvious, based on stronger lipid absorption[17]. In addition, the light at a wavelength of 1.7 μm can penetrate deeper into tissue; thus, more structural information can be obtained, enabling the visualization of a large lipid pool. Here, we present a novel IVOCT system with a 1.7 μm swept source laser for identification of atherosclerosis. We performed imaging in phantom and human coronary artery specimens. Our results indicate that the IVOCT system with a center wavelength of 1.7 μm increases the imaging depth and allows for better identification of the morphology and chemical composition of atherosclerotic plaques.

Results

Phantom preparation and imaging

In order to demonstrate the performance of the novel IVOCT system, a vessel-mimicking gelatin phantom was imaged. A solution containing 5% gelatin and 2% silica particles with an average particle diameter of 5 μm was molded into a hollow cylindrical shape. Figure 1(a–d) show IVOCT images of the phantom with the novel (1.7 μm) and conventional (1.3 μm) IVOCT systems. Figure 1(a and b) show the phantom images in air. Figure 1(c and d) demonstrate the phantom images in water. Between Fig. 1(a and b), the penetration depth is deeper for the 1.7 μm OCT system compared to the 1.3 μm OCT system. Figure 1(e) is a quantitative analysis of the imaging depth that shows the relationship between the depth and the OCT signal intensity from the area indicated by the yellow dashed line in Fig. 1(a and b). From Fig. 1(e), we can conclude that the penetration depth of the 1.7 μm IVOCT system is approximately two times higher than that of the 1.3 μm IVOCT system. In consideration of the strong absorption from water at the 1.7 μm wavelength, the experiments were also performed in water for a more accurate estimation. The corresponding IVOCT images are shown in Fig. 1(c and d). Figure 1(f) is a quantitative analysis from the area indicated by yellow dashed line in Fig. 1(c and d), which also shows an increase in penetration depth for the 1.7 μm OCT system compared to the 1.3 μm OCT system. By comparing the penetration depth results in both water and air, we can infer that the absorption from water does not influence the penetration depth significantly, with the reason being that the volume of the phantom’s hollow cylinder is relatively small. With regards to an in-vivo clinical application, the lumen’s coronary artery diameter is about 2–3 mm, which is small enough such that the influence from the water absorption is negligible.
Figure 1

IVOCT images of vessel-mimicking phantom and quantitative analysis for penetration depth. (a) and (c) IVOCT images with conventional IVOCT system in air and water, respectively. (b) and (d) IVOCT images with the 1.7 μm IVOCT system in air and water, respectively. (e) and (f) Quantitative analysis of penetration depth for two IVOCT systems in air and water.

IVOCT images of vessel-mimicking phantom and quantitative analysis for penetration depth. (a) and (c) IVOCT images with conventional IVOCT system in air and water, respectively. (b) and (d) IVOCT images with the 1.7 μm IVOCT system in air and water, respectively. (e) and (f) Quantitative analysis of penetration depth for two IVOCT systems in air and water.

Human Coronary Artery

To further verify the capability of large penetration depth with the 1.7 μm IVOCT system, a healthy human coronary artery was imaged. Figure 2(a and c) show IVOCT images obtained by the 1.3 μm IVOCT system in air and water, respectively. Figure 2(b and d) show IVOCT images obtained by the 1.7 μm IVOCT system in water and air, respectively. Comparing Fig. 2(a,b,c and d), it can be seen that more information was obtained along the axial direction with the 1.7 μm IVOCT system. Figure 2(e and f) are the quantitative analyses of penetration depth for the two IVOCT systems in air and water, respectively, which also demonstrate the larger penetration depth achievable with the 1.7 μm IVOCT system. These results agree well with the phantom experiments.
Figure 2

IVOCT images of healthy human artery and quantitative analysis for penetration depth. (a) and (c) IVOCT images with the 1.3 μm IVOCT system in air and water, respectively. (b) and (d) IVOCT images with the 1.7 μm IVOCT system in air and water, respectively. (e) and (f) Quantitative analysis of penetration depth for two IVOCT systems in air and water. Scale bars are 1 mm.

IVOCT images of healthy human artery and quantitative analysis for penetration depth. (a) and (c) IVOCT images with the 1.3 μm IVOCT system in air and water, respectively. (b) and (d) IVOCT images with the 1.7 μm IVOCT system in air and water, respectively. (e) and (f) Quantitative analysis of penetration depth for two IVOCT systems in air and water. Scale bars are 1 mm. To demonstrate the capability of differentiating the plaque from normal tissue, atherosclerotic coronary arteries were imaged by using the two IVOCT systems. Groups (I-IV) are IVOCT images at different arterial sites with different pathological features. Figure 3 (a–d) were obtained at similar sites by the 1.3 μm and 1.7 μm IVOCT systems in both air and water. Figure 3 (Ie–IVe) are corresponding hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) histology for each group. For group I, a low-density signal region (denoted by the yellow arrow) can be found in Fig. 3 (Ia–Ie), which indicates the existence of a calcified plaque. The classification of the plaque type is validated by the corresponding histology images, which match the four IVOCT images well. For groups II and IV, a large low-density signal region was also found, which indicates the existence of thick-cap (>65 μm) fibroatheroma (ThCFA). The corresponding H&E histology [Fig. 3 (II e and IVe)] all verified the results. For group III (a-d), a thin fibrous cap and a large low-density signal region behind the thin fibrous cap were found, indicating thin-cap (<65 μm) fibroatheroma (TCFA). Figure 3 (IIIe) shows the corresponding histology, which verified these results. From the corresponding images of the two systems, it is clearly seen that the 1.7 μm IVOCT system images have a larger penetration depth compared to the 1.3 μm IVOCT system images, which demonstrates the capability of the 1.7 μm system to visualize the whole plaque. Analyzing the results in water and air, we can find that the absorption of water is almost negligible for the atherosclerotic coronary artery due to the small lumen diameter. These IVOCT and H&E histology images illustrate the capability of the 1.7 μm system to identify the plaque with a large imaging depth and high sensitivity.
Figure 3

IVOCT images of the atherosclerotic coronary artery. (Ia–IVa) IVOCT images obtained by the 1.3 μm IVOCT system in air. (Ib–IVb) IVOCT images obtained by the 1.7 μm IVOCT system in air. (Ic–IVc) IVOCT images obtained by the 1.3 μm IVOCT system in water. (Id-IVd) IVOCT images obtained by the 1.7 μm IVOCT system in water. (Ie–IVe) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) histology. Scale bars are 1 mm.

IVOCT images of the atherosclerotic coronary artery. (Ia–IVa) IVOCT images obtained by the 1.3 μm IVOCT system in air. (Ib–IVb) IVOCT images obtained by the 1.7 μm IVOCT system in air. (Ic–IVc) IVOCT images obtained by the 1.3 μm IVOCT system in water. (Id-IVd) IVOCT images obtained by the 1.7 μm IVOCT system in water. (Ie–IVe) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) histology. Scale bars are 1 mm.

Discussion

IVOCT, a minimally invasive, non-ionizing imaging technology, is the gold standard to detect the thin fibrous cap of vulnerable plaques. Due to the shallow penetration depth of the 1.3 μm IVOCT systems, the capability of identifying a large lipid pool is often limited. Here, we utilized a 1.7 μm swept source laser for the IVOCT system that realized a higher sensitivity based on the lipid absorption spectrum and an improved depth penetration based on a longer wavelength band. The results from the human coronary artery in-vitro experiments with the corresponding histopathology verified the performance of the 1.7 μm IVOCT system. Although our results clearly demonstrate the advantages of the 1.7 μm IVOCT system, the current 1.7 μm IVOCT system is far from optimal. The reason is that our current optical couplers work at a center wavelength of either 1.3 μm or 1.5 μm, which reduces the output energy of the light source. In addition, the detector used in the 1.7 μm IVOCT system has a wavelength sensitivity range of 800–1700 nm and is optimized at 1310 nm, which decreases the detection efficiency significantly. If custom-made couplers and detectors that are optimized for the 1.7 μm wavelength are implemented, the performance of the 1.7 μm IVOCT system will be significantly improved. In summary, the novel IVOCT system with the 1.7 μm swept source laser provides a new insight into the pathology of coronary artery disease in-vivo and is a powerful tool to assess the immediate and long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention. Moreover, by combining with other imaging modalities, such as ultrasound imaging and elastography[18,19], it will provide the physician with a powerful tool for imaging, diagnosing, and managing vulnerable plaques. Furthermore, the spectroscopic IVOCT system can also be developed to increase contrast for lipid identification.

Methods

High speed scanning laser

We have collaborated with Santec, Inc., to develop a novel 1.7 μm IVOCT system. The high speed scanning laser is a key component. Table 1 shows the parameters of this laser, and Fig. 4 shows the output power over time. For characterization of atherosclerosis, this laser has several advantages. First, its tuning range is from 1600 nm to 1770 nm, which covers the absorption peak of lipid, the main content of vulnerable plaques. Therefore, the 1.7 μm IVOCT system will provide a high sensitivity for lipid content. In addition, the long wavelength range and high output power will contribute to a large penetration depth and better signal-to-noise ratio which makes the visualization of the whole plaque possible. All of these features make the 1.7 μm IVOCT system a better tool for the characterization of atherosclerosis.
Table 1

Parameters of the high speed scanning laser.

ParameterUnitsMinMaxMeasured
Maximum Optical Output PowermW3542.8
Scan Rangenm135173.8
Center Wavelengthnm166517251684.9
Coherence Lengthmm810.0
Scan RatekHz89.990.190.0
Figure 4

The output power of the 1.7 μm swept source laser.

Parameters of the high speed scanning laser. The output power of the 1.7 μm swept source laser.

System setup and imaging probe

The novel IVOCT system was built based on a 1.7 μm swept source laser with a sweep rate of 90 kHz as shown in Fig. 5. Because there is no commercial coupler and detector specifically designed for the 1.7 μm wavelength band, we applied the couplers (90:10 and 50:50) with a center wavelength of 1310 nm and circulators with a center wavelength of 1550 nm in the proposed IVOCT system. The mismatch between the couplers, circulars, and swept source laser caused a decrease in  the laser power. In order to demonstrate the performance of the novel IVOCT, we also built a typical 1.3 μm IVOCT system with the same optical components except for the circulators. A swept source (Santec, Inc., HSL-2100) with a center wavelength of 1310 nm and a sweeping rate of 20 kHz was used in the 1.3 μm OCT system. In both IVOCT systems, output light was split by a 90:10 coupler into the sample and reference arms, respectively. A balanced photodetector (800 nm-1700 nm) and a 12 bit data acquisition board were used to detect and record the interference signal. The IVOCT software was written entirely in C++ for data acquisition, image processing, and display in real-time using GPU.
Figure 5

Schematic of the 1.7 μm IVOCT system (a) and the imaging probe (b).

Schematic of the 1.7 μm IVOCT system (a) and the imaging probe (b). A 1.2 mm proximal scanning endoscopic OCT probe[20] was developed for 3-D imaging as shown in Fig. 5. The OCT laser beam propagates through the single mode core fiber, is focused by a grin-lens, and then reflected to the tissue surface by a rod mirror at an angle of 45°. The spot size at a 1.5 mm working distance (1700 nm and 1310 nm) is around 15 µm. All of the elements were housed in a metal cap and fixed by epoxy. The cap was connected to a double-wrapped torque coil. A custom-made rotary joint was used to propagate the laser beam while rotating the probe. Two motors were used for driving the rotating/pullback catheter assembly. The pullback speed was set to be 1 mm per second with a frame rate of 40 images (the 1.7 μm OCT system) and 20 images (the 1.3 μm OCT system) per second. For allexperiments, the output power of the 1.3 μm OCT system was attenuated to the same energy with the 1.7 μm OCT system. The energy from the probe tip was measured to be around 6 mW for both IVOCT systems. Under the same conditions, we performed the experiments and analyzed the results. The two OCT systems have similar sensitivity (1.3 µm: 101 dB, 1.7 µm: 102 dB) and resolution (1.3 µm: 17.9 µm, 1.7 µm: 22.6 µm). In addition, a logarithmic transform was applied to the OCT signal in all of the figures and plots to make low-reflective layers visible.

Human coronary artery imaging

Fresh human coronary  artery samples were obtained from cadavers and frozen in a −19 degree freezer. After the imaging system was set up, the tissue was imaged with the 1.7 μm IVOCT system and 1.3 μm IVOCT system in air and water. After imaging, the region of interest was marked with pins. The tissue was decalcified, embedded, and sectioned to 6 μm-thick slides. Then the slides were stained with H&E, and images were taken with a microscope with 4x magnification to find a match with the experimental region of interest. All methods were carried out in accordance with the University of California, Irvine (UCI) Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC). IRB granted an exemption to the protocol requirement since the activities do not constitute Human Subject Research. Informed consent was deemed unnecessary because confidentiality of the deceased cadaver tissues is protected and coded. All experimental protocols were approved by the UCI IBC under protocol #2016–1570.
  19 in total

1.  Integrated intravascular optical coherence tomography ultrasound imaging system.

Authors:  Jiechen Yin; Hao-Chung Yang; Xiang Li; Jun Zhang; Qifa Zhou; Changhong Hu; K Kirk Shung; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J A Ambrose; M A Tannenbaum; D Alexopoulos; C E Hjemdahl-Monsen; J Leavy; M Weiss; S Borrico; R Gorlin; V Fuster
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Coronary plaque disruption.

Authors:  E Falk; P K Shah; V Fuster
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-08-01       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Quantification of macrophage content in atherosclerotic plaques by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Guillermo J Tearney; Hiroshi Yabushita; Stuart L Houser; H Thomas Aretz; Ik-Kyung Jang; Kelly H Schlendorf; Christopher R Kauffman; Milen Shishkov; Elkan F Halpern; Brett E Bouma
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I.

Authors:  Morteza Naghavi; Peter Libby; Erling Falk; S Ward Casscells; Silvio Litovsky; John Rumberger; Juan Jose Badimon; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Pedro Moreno; Gerard Pasterkamp; Zahi Fayad; Peter H Stone; Sergio Waxman; Paolo Raggi; Mohammad Madjid; Alireza Zarrabi; Allen Burke; Chun Yuan; Peter J Fitzgerald; David S Siscovick; Chris L de Korte; Masanori Aikawa; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Gerd Assmann; Christoph R Becker; James H Chesebro; Andrew Farb; Zorina S Galis; Chris Jackson; Ik-Kyung Jang; Wolfgang Koenig; Robert A Lodder; Keith March; Jasenka Demirovic; Mohamad Navab; Silvia G Priori; Mark D Rekhter; Raymond Bahr; Scott M Grundy; Roxana Mehran; Antonio Colombo; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie Ballantyne; William Insull; Robert S Schwartz; Robert Vogel; Patrick W Serruys; Goran K Hansson; David P Faxon; Sanjay Kaul; Helmut Drexler; Philip Greenland; James E Muller; Renu Virmani; Paul M Ridker; Douglas P Zipes; Prediman K Shah; James T Willerson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Validating a bimodal intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) catheter for atherosclerotic plaque detection in rabbits.

Authors:  Maxime Abran; Barbara E Stähli; Nolwenn Merlet; Teodora Mihalache-Avram; Mélanie Mecteau; Eric Rhéaume; David Busseuil; Jean-Claude Tardif; Frédéric Lesage
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Fully integrated optical coherence tomography, ultrasound, and indocyanine green-based fluorescence tri-modality system for intravascular imaging.

Authors:  Yan Li; Joseph Jing; Yueqiao Qu; Yusi Miao; Buyun Zhang; Teng Ma; Mingyue Yu; Qifa Zhou; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Imaging and characterizing shear wave and shear modulus under orthogonal acoustic radiation force excitation using OCT Doppler variance method.

Authors:  Jiang Zhu; Yueqiao Qu; Teng Ma; Rui Li; Yongzhao Du; Shenghai Huang; K Kirk Shung; Qifa Zhou; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.776

9.  3D mapping of elastic modulus using shear wave optical micro-elastography.

Authors:  Jiang Zhu; Li Qi; Yusi Miao; Teng Ma; Cuixia Dai; Yueqiao Qu; Youmin He; Yiwei Gao; Qifa Zhou; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Anatomically correct visualization of the human upper airway using a high-speed long range optical coherence tomography system with an integrated positioning sensor.

Authors:  Joseph C Jing; Lidek Chou; Erica Su; Brian J F Wong; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  16 in total

1.  Multimodal Intravascular Photoacoustic and Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Yan Li; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2018-03-26

2.  High-Speed Integrated Endoscopic Photoacoustic and Ultrasound Imaging System.

Authors:  Yan Li; Zhikai Zhu; Joseph C Jing; Jason J Chen; Emon Heidari; Youmin He; Jiang Zhu; Teng Ma; Mingyue Yu; Qifa Zhou; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 4.544

3.  Acoustic radiation force optical coherence elastography for elasticity assessment of soft tissues.

Authors:  Jiang Zhu; Xingdao He; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  Appl Spectrosc Rev       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  Viscosity monitoring during hemodiluted blood coagulation using optical coherence elastography.

Authors:  Xiangqun Xu; Jiang Zhu; Junxiao Yu; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.544

5.  Multimodal endoscopy for colorectal cancer detection by optical coherence tomography and near-infrared fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Yan Li; Zhikai Zhu; Jason J Chen; Joseph C Jing; Chung-Ho Sun; Sehwan Kim; Phil-Sang Chung; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  1.7 micron optical coherence tomography for vaginal tissue characterization in vivo.

Authors:  Yan Li; Neha T Sudol; Yusi Miao; Joseph C Jing; Jiang Zhu; Felicia Lane; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.025

7.  Computational analysis of six optical coherence tomography systems for vocal fold imaging: A comparison study.

Authors:  Tiffany T Pham; Lily Chen; Andrew E Heidari; Jason J Chen; Alisa Zhukhovitskaya; Yan Li; Urja Patel; Zhongping Chen; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  1.7-Micron Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography for Characterization of Skin Lesions-A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Yan Li; Raksha Sreeramachandra Murthy; Yirui Zhu; Fengyi Zhang; Jianing Tang; Joseph N Mehrabi; Kristen M Kelly; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 11.037

9.  Automated 3D segmentation of methyl isocyanate-exposed rat trachea using an ultra-thin, fully fiber optic optical coherence endoscopic probe.

Authors:  Yusi Miao; Joseph C Jing; Vineet Desai; Sari B Mahon; Matthew Brenner; Livia A Veress; Carl W White; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Water wavenumber calibration for visible light optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Tingwei Zhang; Aaron M Kho; Vivek J Srinivasan
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.170

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.