Massimo Bottini1, Saida Mebarek2, Karen L Anderson3, Agnieszka Strzelecka-Kiliszek4, Lukasz Bozycki4, Ana Maria Sper Simão5, Maytê Bolean5, Pietro Ciancaglini5, Joanna Bandorowicz Pikula4, Slawomir Pikula4, David Magne2, Niels Volkmann3, Dorit Hanein3, José Luis Millán3, Rene Buchet6. 1. University of Rome Tor Vergata, Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, 00133 Roma, Italy; Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. 2. Universite Lyon 1, UFR Chimie Biochimie, 69 622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France; ICBMS UMR 5246 CNRS, 69 622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France; INSA, Lyon, 69 622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France; CPE, Lyon, 69 622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France; Universite de Lyon, 69 622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France. 3. Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. 4. Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Department of Biochemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland. 5. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, USP, Departamento de Química, 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. 6. Universite Lyon 1, UFR Chimie Biochimie, 69 622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France; ICBMS UMR 5246 CNRS, 69 622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France; INSA, Lyon, 69 622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France; CPE, Lyon, 69 622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France; Universite de Lyon, 69 622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France. Electronic address: rene.buchet@univ-lyon1.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Matrix vesicles (MVs) are released from hypertrophic chondrocytes and from mature osteoblasts, the cells responsible for endochondral and membranous ossification. Under pathological conditions, they can also be released from cells of non-skeletal tissues such as vascular smooth muscle cells. MVs are extracellular vesicles of approximately 100-300nm diameter harboring the biochemical machinery needed to induce mineralization. SCOPE OF THE REVIEW: The review comprehensively delineates our current knowledge of MV biology and highlights open questions aiming to stimulate further research. The review is constructed as a series of questions addressing issues of MVs ranging from their biogenesis and functions, to biomimetic models. It critically evaluates experimental data including their isolation and characterization methods, like lipidomics, proteomics, transmission electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy and proteoliposome models mimicking MVs. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: MVs have a relatively well-defined function as initiators of mineralization. They bind to collagen and their composition reflects the composition of lipid rafts. We call attention to the as yet unclear mechanisms leading to the biogenesis of MVs, and how minerals form and when they are formed. We discuss the prospects of employing upcoming experimental models to deepen our understanding of MV-mediated mineralization and mineralization disorders such as the use of reconstituted lipid vesicles, proteoliposomes and, native sample preparations and high-resolution technologies. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: MVs have been extensively investigated owing to their roles in skeletal and ectopic mineralization. MVs serve as a model system for lipid raft structures, and for the mechanisms of genesis and release of extracellular vesicles.
BACKGROUND: Matrix vesicles (MVs) are released from hypertrophic chondrocytes and from mature osteoblasts, the cells responsible for endochondral and membranous ossification. Under pathological conditions, they can also be released from cells of non-skeletal tissues such as vascular smooth muscle cells. MVs are extracellular vesicles of approximately 100-300nm diameter harboring the biochemical machinery needed to induce mineralization. SCOPE OF THE REVIEW: The review comprehensively delineates our current knowledge of MV biology and highlights open questions aiming to stimulate further research. The review is constructed as a series of questions addressing issues of MVs ranging from their biogenesis and functions, to biomimetic models. It critically evaluates experimental data including their isolation and characterization methods, like lipidomics, proteomics, transmission electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy and proteoliposome models mimicking MVs. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS:MVs have a relatively well-defined function as initiators of mineralization. They bind to collagen and their composition reflects the composition of lipid rafts. We call attention to the as yet unclear mechanisms leading to the biogenesis of MVs, and how minerals form and when they are formed. We discuss the prospects of employing upcoming experimental models to deepen our understanding of MV-mediated mineralization and mineralization disorders such as the use of reconstituted lipid vesicles, proteoliposomes and, native sample preparations and high-resolution technologies. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: MVs have been extensively investigated owing to their roles in skeletal and ectopic mineralization. MVs serve as a model system for lipid raft structures, and for the mechanisms of genesis and release of extracellular vesicles.
Authors: Beth A Derfus; Jason B Kurian; Jeffrey J Butler; Laureen J Daft; Guillermo F Carrera; Lawrence M Ryan; Ann K Rosenthal Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Carla S B Viegas; Marta S Rafael; José L Enriquez; Alexandra Teixeira; Rui Vitorino; Inês M Luís; Rúben M Costa; Sofia Santos; Sofia Cavaco; José Neves; Anjos L Macedo; Brecht A G Willems; Cees Vermeer; Dina C Simes Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Rukshana C Shroff; Rosamund McNair; Nichola Figg; Jeremy N Skepper; Leon Schurgers; Ashmeet Gupta; Melanie Hiorns; Ann E Donald; John Deanfield; Lesley Rees; Catherine M Shanahan Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-10-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ana Maria S Simão; Manisha C Yadav; Sonoko Narisawa; Mayte Bolean; Joao Martins Pizauro; Marc F Hoylaerts; Pietro Ciancaglini; José Luis Millán Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2010-01-04 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: R Derradi; M Bolean; A M S Simão; L Caseli; J L Millán; M Bottini; P Ciancaglini; A P Ramos Journal: Langmuir Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 3.882
Authors: Paul H Schlesinger; Harry C Blair; Donna Beer Stolz; Vladimir Riazanski; Evan C Ray; Irina L Tourkova; Deborah J Nelson Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Marco A R Andrade; Rafael Derradi; Ana M S Simão; José Luis Millán; Ana P Ramos; Pietro Ciancaglini; Maytê Bolean Journal: Arch Biochem Biophys Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 4.013
Authors: Michael B Chavez; Kaitrin Kramer; Emily Y Chu; Vivek Thumbigere-Math; Brian L Foster Journal: J Struct Biol Date: 2020-08-03 Impact factor: 2.867