| Literature DB >> 29108828 |
Liz Lightstone1, Andrea Doria2, Hannah Wilson1, Frank L Ward3, Maddalena Larosa4, Joanne M Bargman3.
Abstract
The outcome of lupus nephritis (LN) has changed since the introduction of glucocorticoids (GCs), which dramatically reduced the mortality related to one of the most severe complications of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Since the 1950's, other immunosuppressants, including biologic drugs (i.e. rituximab) have aided in maintaining remission, preserving kidney function, but not preventing treatment-related toxicity. GCs still remain the cornerstone in the treatment of SLE, including LN, and they are widely used in clinical practice. However, GC administration represents a double-edged sword. Indeed, from one side they allow a fast and effective control of disease activity by dampening inflammation; from the other side, they have many and severe side effects leading to organ damage. In this paper, we will discuss pros and cons of the chronic use of GCs, especially focusing on LN.Entities:
Keywords: Adverse events; Corticosteroids; Lupus nephritis; Management
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29108828 DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.11.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Autoimmun Rev ISSN: 1568-9972 Impact factor: 9.754