| Literature DB >> 29108368 |
Paolo F Caimi1,2, Brenda W Cooper1,2, Basem M William3, Afshin Dowlati1,2, Paul M Barr4, Pingfu Fu5, John Pink1, Yan Xu1, Hillard M Lazarus1,2, Marcos de Lima1,2, Stanton L Gerson1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We determined the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and recommended phase II dose of the base excision repair blocker methoxyamine combined with fludarabine.Entities:
Keywords: base excision repair; hematologic malignancies; methoxyamine; pharmacokinetics; phase I
Year: 2017 PMID: 29108368 PMCID: PMC5668101 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20094
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Patient demographic and clinical characteristics
| Characteristic | No. of patients |
|---|---|
| 20 | |
| Median | 64 |
| Range | 45–82 |
| Male | 12 (60%) |
| Female | 8 (40%) |
| 1 – 2 | 7 (35%) |
| ≥ 3 | 13 (65%) |
| 8 (40%) | |
| CLL/SLL | 10 (50%) |
| Follicular lymphoma | 3 (15%) |
| Diffuse large B cell lymphoma | 3 (15%) |
| Mantle cell lymphoma | 1 (5%) |
| Plasma cell myeloma | 2 (10%) |
| 0 | 4 (20%) |
| 1 | 15 (75%) |
| 2 | 1 (5%) |
Pharmacokinetic parameters of methoxyamine
| Dose | Half Life, mean (± SEM) | Cmax, mean (± SEM) | AUC, mean (± SEM) | Clearance, mean (± SEM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 40.9 (± 7.0) | 12.6 (± 1.3) | 691.6 (± 44.8) | 22062.0 (± 1445.4) |
| 30 | 41.6 (± 8.9) | 18.8 (± 5.4) | 1044.4 (± 301.3) | 34241.2 (± 9978.7) |
| 60 | 44.9 (± 3.1) | 37.5 (± 8.3) | 2502.4 (± 816.3) | 29014.3 (± 7954.4) |
| 90 | 46.0 (± 5.9) | 100.0 (± 21.3) | 6560.6 (± 1560.1) | 16035.0 (± 4895.5) |
| 120 | 45.0 (± 5.2) | 100.4 (± 13.8) | 6358.2 (± 1042.2) | 22180.8 (± 4371.2) |
AUC: area under the curve of plasma concentration; Cmax: maximum plasma concentration.
Figure 1Average methoxyamine concentration in plasma over time after a single administration
Figure 4Change over time in absolute lymphocyte count and comet tail length in subjects diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia with peripheral blood lymphocytosis (n = 7)
Adverse events in subjects treated with fludarabine and methoxyamine
| Toxicity | All Grades (%) | Grade 3 – 4 (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hematologic | % | % | ||
| Leukopenia | 17 | 85 | 10 | 50 |
| Neutropenia | 15 | 75 | 12 | 60 |
| Anemia | 20 | 100 | 8 | 40 |
| Thrombocytopenia | 13 | 65 | 5 | 25 |
| Lymphopenia | 16 | 80 | 14 | 70 |
| Gastrointestinal | ||||
| Anorexia | 10 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
| Constipation | 9 | 45 | 0 | 0 |
| Diarrhea | 5 | 25 | 1 | 5 |
| Nausea | 13 | 65 | 0 | 0 |
| Vomiting | 5 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| Neurologic | ||||
| Insomnia | 7 | 35 | 1 | 5 |
| Dizziness | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Paresthesias | 10 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
| Pain | 8 | 40 | 1 | 5 |
| Respiratory | ||||
| Cough | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Dyspnea | 7 | 35 | 0 | 0 |
| General | ||||
| Fatigue | 17 | 85 | 0 | 0 |
| Cutaneous/Dermatologic | ||||
| Alopecia | 3 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| Erythema | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Pruritus | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Infectious | ||||
| Fever | 6 | 30 | 1 | 5 |
| Infection | 5 | 25 | 3 | 15 |
| Cardiovascular | ||||
| Edema | 3 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory | ||||
| Hyperbilirubinemia | 8 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
| Hypokalemia | 3 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| Hyperuricemia without TLS | 3 | 15 | 1 | 5 |
| Hypoalbuminemia | 7 | 35 | 1 | 5 |
| Hyponatremia | 8 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
| Hypocalcemia | 11 | 55 | 0 | 0 |
| Transaminase elevation | 5 | 25 | 1 | 5 |
| Creatinine elevation | 5 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| Haptoglobin decrease | 6 | 30 | 0 | 0 |
Figure 2Waterfall plots of best overall response according to response criteria in 17 patients with measurable disease (patients excluded include one subject with CLL and no measurable lymph nodes and two subjects with plasma cell myeloma) (ALCL: anaplastic large cell lymphoma; DLBCL: diffuse large B cell lymphoma; MCL: mantle cell lymphoma)
Figure 3Kaplan Meier analysis of overall survival from treatment initiation
(OS: Overall Survival).