| Literature DB >> 29108027 |
Jialiang Guo1,2,3, Qi Zhang1,2,3, Jia Li1,2,3, Yansong Liu4, Zhiyong Hou1,2, Wei Chen1,2,3, Lin Jin1,2,3, Ye Tian1,2,3, Linlin Ju1,2,3, Bo Liu1,2,3, Tianhua Dong1,2,3, Fei Zhang1,2,3, Yingze Zhang1,2,3.
Abstract
Non-union is a major clinical problem in the healing of fractures, especially in patients with osteoporosis. The systemic administration of drugs is time consuming and large doses are demanding and act slowly, whereas local release acts rapidly, increases the quality and quantity of the bone tissue. We hypothesize that local delivery demonstrates better therapeutic effects on an osteoporotic fracture. The aim of this paper is to investigate the effect of the local application of ibandronate loaded with a collagen sponge on regulating bone formation and remodeling in an osteoporotic rat model of fracture healing. We found that the local delivery of ibandronate exhibited excellent effects on improving the bone microarchitecture and suppressed effects on bone remodeling. At 4 weeks, more callus formation and improvement of mechanical character and microstructure were observed in a local delivery via μCT, mechanical test, histological research and serum analysis. The suppression of bone remodeling was compared with a systemic treatment at 12 weeks, and the structural mechanical properties and microarchitecture were also improved with local delivery. This research identifies an earlier, safer and integrated approach for local delivery of ibandronate with collagen and provides a better strategy for the treatment of osteoporotic fracture in rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29108027 PMCID: PMC5673204 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187683
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Quantification of IB release kinetics.
The quantification of IB release kinetics from collagen in vitro (n = 6 for IB quantification at each time point).
Fig 2Results of local drug delivery (including CS, IB and their combination) into femoral fractures on bone union and microarchitecture in rats subjected to ovariectomy.
(A) X-ray analysis. At 4 weeks, the callus formed in Sham was high in density, partly union and was similar to cortical bone. In contrast, the fracture gap was clearly shown in Control group. Twelve-week radiographs showed that the fractures of Sham group were united with remodeling completed, and the calluses of the IB-treated groups were much larger and lower density. (B) Three-dimensional reconstructed3-D Micro CT images in each treatment group. There was more mineralized callus forming bridge between fracture line in IB treatment compared with non-treatment group (Control and CS group) at 4 weeks. All groups entered into the remodeling phase at 12 weeks. Although the callus in the Sham and Control group all calcified to lamellar bone after remodeling, the osteoporotic status was obviously observed in Control. More external callus was shown in IB treatment groups (IB+CS and IB/CS) than that of CNT which means that the remodeling process was delayed. Sham: sham-operated group; Control: ovariectomized control group; CS group: local application of collagen sponge with ovariectomy; CS+IB group: local application of collagen sponge and systemic delivery of ibadronate with ovariectomy; CS/IB group: local delivery of collagen sponge combined with ibandronate.
Fig 33D histomorphometry and fracture union scorings.
(A-E) CS+IB and CS/IB groups at 4 weeks exhibited BV/TV density of BV and TV, Tb.Th, Tb.N and Conn.D were significantly increased and Tb.Sp reduced compared with those in Control group (p<0.05). The IB treatment group exhibited significant increase in BV/TV, density of BV, density of TV, Tb.Th, Tb.N and Conn.D, and lower in Tb.Sp than Control and CS group. The CS/IB also exhibited an improvement in trabecular bone parameter such as Tb.Th, Tb.N compared with CS+IB group. (F) There was significant improvement for CS/IB in scores compared with that in Control group at 12 weeks post injection. Values represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Each group consisted of 6 rats.*P< 0.05 compared to Sham by unpaired t-test; ^ P < 0.05 compared to Control; #P < 0.05 compared to CS; $< 0.05 compared to CS+IB. Tukey's multiple comparison test was applied were used to determine the differences between the Control group and all other ovariectomized (OVX) groups. CON, connectivity; TBN, trabecular number; TBTH, trabecular thickness; TBSP, trabecular separation.
Fig 4Serum levels of bone turnover markers.
Serum biomarkers of bone formation, N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) and of bone resorption, C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) indicated that structural bone changes observed following injury are mainly caused by the decreased bone resorption with mild change in bone formation. Values represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Each group consisted of 6 rats.*P< 0.05 compared to Sham by unpaired t-test; ^ P < 0.05 compared to Control; #P < 0.05 compared to CS; $< 0.05 compared to CS+IB.
Fig 5Combination treatment with IB plus CS increased femoral fracture strength.
(A-C) The IB treatment group showed that mechanical parameters were increased in comparison with that in Control group. (D) No significant decrease for CS/IB in elastic modulus compared with that in Control, CS and CS+IB groups at 12 weeks. Values represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD). *P< 0.05 compared to Sham by unpaired t-test; ^ P < 0.05 compared to Control; #P < 0.05 compared to CS; $< 0.05 compared to CS+IB.
Fig 6Histological evaluation of the fracture in each group at 4 weeks after surgery.
HE staining, Safranin O and fast green staining, Masson staining. Scale bar = 500μm.
Fig 7Histological evaluation of the fracture in each group at 12 weeks after surgery.
HE staining. Safranin O and fast green staining, Masson staining. Scale bar = 500μm.
Effects of local drug sustained-release delivery (including IB) on trabecular bone histomorphometry in rats subjected to ovariectomy combined with femoral fracture.
| Bone histomorphometry in fracture callus at 4 weeks post-fracture | |||||
| Group | Sham | Control | CS | CS+IB | CS/IB |
| Ca.Ar (mm2) | 7.2±0.9 | 11.4±1.9 | 13.3±1.3a | 14.6±1.1 | 16.7±1.3 |
| Lamellar/Ca.Ar (%) | 45.3±3.0 | 12.2±2.1 | 17.5±3.1 | 9.8±2.0 | 8.3±1.2 |
| BFR/BS (μm3/μm2 per day) | 0.98±0.12 | 0.54±0.13 | 0.74±0.14 | 1.13±0.11 | 1.37±0.11 |
| MAR (μm/day) | 1.71±0.19 | 1.31±0.11 | 1.41±0.13 | 1.61±0.17 | 1.88±0.14 |
| Bone histomorphometry in fracture callus at 12 weeks post-fracture | |||||
| Group | Sham | Control | CS | CS+IB | CS/IB |
| Ca.Ar (mm2) | 9.4±1.2 | 8.1±1.1 | 8.2±1.3 | 11.3±2.1 | 13.6±1.7 |
| Lamellar/Ca.Ar (%) | 97.5±0.7 | 97.8±0.94 | 98.6±0.89 | 80.9±1.13 | 78. 2±3.9 |
| BFR/BS (μm3/μm2 per day) | 0.74±0.09 | 0.43±0.13 | 0.47±0.24 | 0.39±0.18 | 0.47±0.11 |
| MAR (μm/day) | 1.61±0.11 | 1.25±0.09 | 1.27±0.13 | 1.05±0. 17 | 1.01±0. 34 |
Values represent the mean ± SD. Each group was formed by 6 rats.
*p<0.05 compared to Sham.
a p<0.05 compared to Control.
b p<0.05 compared to CS
c p<0.05 compared to CS+IB.