Literature DB >> 29107783

PBT assessment under REACH: Screening for low aquatic bioaccumulation with QSAR classifications based on physicochemical properties to replace BCF in vivo testing on fish.

Monika Nendza1, Ralph Kühne2, Anna Lombardo3, Sebastian Strempel4, Gerrit Schüürmann5.   

Abstract

Aquatic bioconcentration factors (BCFs) are critical in PBT (persistent, bioaccumulative, toxic) and risk assessment of chemicals. High costs and use of more than 100 fish per standard BCF study (OECD 305) call for alternative methods to replace as much in vivo testing as possible. The BCF waiving scheme is a screening tool combining QSAR classifications based on physicochemical properties related to the distribution (hydrophobicity, ionisation), persistence (biodegradability, hydrolysis), solubility and volatility (Henry's law constant) of substances in water bodies and aquatic biota to predict substances with low aquatic bioaccumulation (nonB, BCF<2000). The BCF waiving scheme was developed with a dataset of reliable BCFs for 998 compounds and externally validated with another 181 substances. It performs with 100% sensitivity (no false negatives), >50% efficacy (waiving potential), and complies with the OECD principles for valid QSARs. The chemical applicability domain of the BCF waiving scheme is given by the structures of the training set, with some compound classes explicitly excluded like organometallics, poly- and perfluorinated compounds, aromatic triphenylphosphates, surfactants. The prediction confidence of the BCF waiving scheme is based on applicability domain compliance, consensus modelling, and the structural similarity with known nonB and B/vB substances. Compounds classified as nonB by the BCF waiving scheme are candidates for waiving of BCF in vivo testing on fish due to low concern with regard to the B criterion. The BCF waiving scheme supports the 3Rs with a possible reduction of >50% of BCF in vivo testing on fish. If the target chemical is outside the applicability domain of the BCF waiving scheme or not classified as nonB, further assessments with in silico, in vitro or in vivo methods are necessary to either confirm or reject bioaccumulative behaviour.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (Bio)degradability; 3Rs; BCF waiving scheme; Consensus modelling; Octanol/water partition coefficient (log K(ow)); Structural similarity with nonB/B/vB substances

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29107783     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  2 in total

1.  In vitro biotransformation assays using fish liver cells: Comparing rainbow trout and carp hepatocytes.

Authors:  Ina Bischof; Jon A Arnot; Heinrich Jürling; Georg Knipschild; Christian Schlechtriem; Anna Schauerte; Helmut Segner
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-09-23

Review 2.  In vitro or not in vitro: a short journey through a long history.

Authors:  Kristina Rehberger; Christian Kropf; Helmut Segner
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.893

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.