Literature DB >> 29107774

Analysis of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of best management practices for controlling sediment yield: A case study of the Joumine watershed, Tunisia.

Slim Mtibaa1, Norifumi Hotta2, Mitsuteru Irie3.   

Abstract

Soil erosion can be reduced through the strategic selection and placement of best management practices (BMPs) in critical source areas (CSAs). In the present study, the Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was used to identify CSAs and investigate the effectiveness of different BMPs in reducing sediment yield in the Joumine watershed, an agricultural river catchment located in northern Tunisia. A cost-benefit analysis (CBA) was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different BMP scenarios. The objective of the present study was to determine the most cost-effective management scenario for controlling sediment yield. The model performance for the simulation of streamflow and sediment yield at the outlet of the Joumine watershed was good and satisfactory, respectively. The model indicated that most of the sediment was originated from the cultivated upland area. About 34% of the catchment area consisted of CSAs that were affected by high to very high soil erosion risk (sediment yield >10t/ha/year). Contour ridges were found to be the most effective individual BMP in terms of sediment yield reduction. At the watershed level, implementing contour ridges in the CSAs reduced sediment yield by 59%. Combinations of BMP scenarios were more cost-effective than the contour ridges alone. Combining buffer strips (5-m width) with other BMPs depending on land slope (> 20% slope: conversion to olive orchards; 10-20% slope: contour ridges; 5-10% slope: grass strip cropping) was the most effective approach in terms of sediment yield reduction and economic benefits. This approach reduced sediment yield by 61.84% with a benefit/cost ratio of 1.61. Compared with the cost of dredging, BMPs were more cost-effective for reducing sediment loads to the Joumine reservoir, located downstream of the catchment. Our findings may contribute to ensure the sustainability of future conservation programs in Tunisian regions.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Combinations of BMPs scenarios; Cost-benefit analysis; Individual BMPs; Joumine watershed; SWAT model; Soil erosion

Year:  2017        PMID: 29107774     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  2 in total

1.  Assessment of Agriculture Pressures Impact on the Joumine River Water Quality Using the PEGASE Model.

Authors:  Amira Boukari; Sihem Benabdallah; Etienne Everbecq; Pol Magermans; Aline Grard; Hamadi Habaieb; Jean-François Deliège
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Fuzzy programming method for multi-objective optimal allocation of sediment resources and the cooperative bargaining: a case study in Weishan irrigation area, China.

Authors:  Xianjia Wang; Ying Qin; Wenjun Yang; Suiqiu Yuan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 5.190

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.