Daniel S Tsze1, Carl L von Baeyer2, Vartan Pahalyants3, Peter S Dayan3. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY. Electronic address: dst2141@columbia.edu. 2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The Verbal Numerical Rating Scale is the most commonly used self-report measure of pain intensity. It is unclear how the validity and reliability of the scale scores vary across children's ages. We aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the scale for children presenting to the emergency department across a comprehensive spectrum of age. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of children aged 4 to 17 years. Children self-reported their pain intensity, using the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale and Faces Pain Scale-Revised at 2 serial assessments. We evaluated convergent validity (strong validity defined as correlation coefficient ≥0.60), agreement (difference between concurrent Verbal Numerical Rating Scale and Faces Pain Scale-Revised scores), known-groups validity (difference in score between children with painful versus nonpainful conditions), responsivity (decrease in score after analgesic administration), and reliability (test-retest at 2 serial assessments) in the total sample and subgroups based on age. RESULTS: We enrolled 760 children; 27 did not understand the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale and were removed. Of the remainder, Pearson correlations were strong to very strong (0.62 to 0.96) in all years of age except 4 and 5 years, and agreement was strong for children aged 8 and older. Known-groups validity and responsivity were strong in all years of age. Reliability was strong in all age subgroups, including each year of age from 4 to 7 years. CONCLUSION: Convergent validity, known-groups validity, responsivity, and reliability of the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale were strong for children aged 6 to 17 years. Convergent validity was not strong for children aged 4 and 5 years. Our findings support the use of the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale for most children aged 6 years and older, but not for those aged 4 and 5 years.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The Verbal Numerical Rating Scale is the most commonly used self-report measure of pain intensity. It is unclear how the validity and reliability of the scale scores vary across children's ages. We aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the scale for children presenting to the emergency department across a comprehensive spectrum of age. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of children aged 4 to 17 years. Children self-reported their pain intensity, using the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale and Faces Pain Scale-Revised at 2 serial assessments. We evaluated convergent validity (strong validity defined as correlation coefficient ≥0.60), agreement (difference between concurrent Verbal Numerical Rating Scale and Faces Pain Scale-Revised scores), known-groups validity (difference in score between children with painful versus nonpainful conditions), responsivity (decrease in score after analgesic administration), and reliability (test-retest at 2 serial assessments) in the total sample and subgroups based on age. RESULTS: We enrolled 760 children; 27 did not understand the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale and were removed. Of the remainder, Pearson correlations were strong to very strong (0.62 to 0.96) in all years of age except 4 and 5 years, and agreement was strong for children aged 8 and older. Known-groups validity and responsivity were strong in all years of age. Reliability was strong in all age subgroups, including each year of age from 4 to 7 years. CONCLUSION: Convergent validity, known-groups validity, responsivity, and reliability of the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale were strong for children aged 6 to 17 years. Convergent validity was not strong for children aged 4 and 5 years. Our findings support the use of the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale for most children aged 6 years and older, but not for those aged 4 and 5 years.
Authors: Marianne Jensen Hjermstad; Peter M Fayers; Dagny F Haugen; Augusto Caraceni; Geoffrey W Hanks; Jon H Loge; Robin Fainsinger; Nina Aass; Stein Kaasa Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Matthew P Myrvik; Amy L Drendel; Amanda M Brandow; Ke Yan; Raymond G Hoffmann; Julie A Panepinto Journal: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 1.289
Authors: H Breivik; P C Borchgrevink; S M Allen; L A Rosseland; L Romundstad; E K Breivik Hals; G Kvarstein; A Stubhaug Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2008-05-16 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Daniel S Tsze; Gerrit Hirschfeld; Carl L von Baeyer; Leonor E Suarez; Peter S Dayan Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Samina Ali; Manasi Rajagopal; Terry Klassen; Lawrence Richer; Christopher McCabe; Andy Willan; Maryna Yaskina; Anna Heath; Amy L Drendel; Martin Offringa; Serge Gouin; Antonia Stang; Scott Sawyer; Maala Bhatt; Serena Hickes; Naveen Poonai Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-06-21 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Anna Heath; Maryna Yaskina; Gareth Hopkin; Terry P Klassen; Christopher McCabe; Martin Offringa; Petros Pechlivanoglou; Juan David Rios; Naveen Poonai; Samina Ali Journal: Trials Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 2.279