Literature DB >> 29107269

How to Biopsy: Transperineal Versus Transrectal, Saturation Versus Targeted, What's the Evidence?

Jeremy Grummet1.   

Abstract

Until recently, prostate biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer has been performed transrectally and in an untargeted sampling fashion. Consequently, the procedure has suffered a small but significant risk of severe morbidity through infection, and low diagnostic accuracy, with undergrading and missed diagnosis being common. MRI is revolutionizing prostate cancer diagnosis by improving detection accuracy via targeted biopsy. Transperineal biopsy is eradicating sepsis as a risk of prostate biopsy, while avoiding the need for broad-spectrum or combination prophylactic antibiotics. This article analyzes the data on the various current methods of performing prostate biopsy and recommends an optimal technique.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; Prostate cancer; Saturation prostate biopsy; Targeted prostate biopsy; Template prostate biopsy; Transperineal prostate biopsy; Transrectal prostate biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29107269     DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2017.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Fusion biopsies for primary diagnosis of prostate cancer : Implementation, benefits, and clinical aspects].

Authors:  L Püllen; B Hadaschik; D Eberli; T H Kuru
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Is active surveillance an appropriate approach to manage prostate cancer patients with Gleason Score 3+3 who met the criteria for active surveillance?

Authors:  Saleh Ghiasy; Amir Reza Abedi; Afshin Moradi; Seyed Yousef Hosseini; Morteza Fallah Karkan; Ghazal Sadri; Mohammadreza Davari
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-11-19

3.  Exploring the impact of providing men with information about potential prostate cancer treatment options prior to receiving biopsy results.

Authors:  Brindha Pillay; Daniel Moon; Denny Meyer; Helen Crowe; Sarah Mann; Nicholas Howard; Addie Wootten; Mark Frydenberg
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Prostate biopsy techniques and pre-biopsy prophylactic measures: variation in current practice patterns in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Sofie C M Tops; Evert L Koldewijn; Diederik M Somford; Anita M P Huis; Eva Kolwijck; Heiman F L Wertheim; Marlies E J L Hulscher; J P Michiel Sedelaar
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Robotic-assisted magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound fusion results in higher significant cancer detection compared to cognitive prostate targeting in biopsy naive men.

Authors:  Manish I Patel; Samir Muter; Philip Vladica; David Gillatt
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04

6.  Surface-projection-based transperineal cognitive fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate: an original technique with a good cancer detection rate.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Xiaofei Wang; Wenfeng Zhao; Zichen Zhao; Zhihu Li; Shengmin Fei; He Zhu; Xiang Ji; Bing Yang; Ningchen Li; Yanqun Na
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 7.  Previous, Current, and Future Pharmacotherapy and Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer-A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Bartosz Malinowski; Michał Wiciński; Nikola Musiała; Ilona Osowska; Mateusz Szostak
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-25

Review 8.  Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique.

Authors:  Alice Thomson; Mo Li; Jeremy Grummet; Shomik Sengupta
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.