Literature DB >> 29107213

Current and future treatment options for pemphigus: Is it time to move towards more effective treatments?

Soheil Tavakolpour1.   

Abstract

Systemic administration of corticosteroid (CS) remains the standard gold treatment for pemphigus. However, because of several long-term adverse effects, steroid-sparing agents are usually prescribed in combination with CSs. Despite the high number of available studies, the choice of best drugs to treat pemphigus remains controversial. Therapeutic approaches for pemphigus can be divided into traditional treatment and emerging ones. Personalized medicine, which aims to increase the efficacy as well as reduce adverse effects of treatments, could be considered as the future option. Here, the most common agents, including azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), methotrexate (MTX), cyclophosphamide (CP), rituximab (RTX) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) have been discussed in detail and compared. Besides, the efficacy and safety profiles of the less frequently used agents such as cyclosporine, dapsone, mizoribine, chlorambucil, plasmapheresis, immunoadsorption and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation have been evaluated. Moreover, some emerging therapeutic options for pemphigus patients, such as B cell activating factor (BAFF), proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) inhibitors, anti-cytokine therapy, co-stimulatory and co-inhibitors manipulators and inhibitors of pathogenic signaling pathways (e.g., p38MAPK, c-Myc and EGFR) have been described. In addition to the conventional approaches, some clues to moving towards personalized medicine for the treatment of pemphigus have been proposed. According to the last evidence, seven available first-line combination therapies, including RTX+IVIg, CS+RTX, CS+MMF, CS+AZA, CS+MTX, CS+CP and CS+IVIg were suggested and compared. Subsequently, the most optimum drugs for three different conditions, including patients with no pregnancy or infection, those at high risk of development/reactivation of infection or pregnant women were suggested.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autoimmune disease; Intravenous immunoglobulin; Pemphigus; Personalized medicine; Rituximab; Treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29107213     DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2017.10.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol        ISSN: 1567-5769            Impact factor:   4.932


  7 in total

Review 1.  Immunotherapy for Pemphigus: Present and Future.

Authors:  Huijie Yuan; Meng Pan; Hongxiang Chen; Xuming Mao
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-15

2.  Pemphigus Vulgaris: A Clinical Study of 31 Cases (2004-2014) in Morocco.

Authors:  Titou Hicham; Fatima Zahra Chahnoun; Tarik Hanafi; Naoufal Hjira; Boui Mohammed
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2020-09-08

Review 3.  Pemphigus: Current and Future Therapeutic Strategies.

Authors:  Dario Didona; Roberto Maglie; Rüdiger Eming; Michael Hertl
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  Efficacy of Sub-Tenon Micro-Perfusion of Cyclophosphamide in Rabbits with Severe Ocular Inflammation.

Authors:  Libei Zhao; Manqiang Peng; Wenxiang Lin; Qian Tan; Muhammad Ahmad Khan; Ding Lin
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 5.  Emerging treatment options for the management of pemphigus vulgaris.

Authors:  Khalaf Kridin
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  The Risk of Depression in Patients with Pemphigus: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yi-Min Hsu; Hsin-Yu Fang; Cheng-Li Lin; Shwn-Huey Shieh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Recurrence of Pemphigus Vulgaris Under Nivolumab Therapy.

Authors:  Sebastian Krammer; Christian Krammer; Suzanna Salzer; Işin Sinem Bağci; Lars E French; Daniela Hartmann
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-11-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.