Introduction: Very little is known about how e-cigarette marketing is being perceived by youth, and the potential effect it will have on youth vaping and smoking behaviors. This limits the ability to identify youth-focused marketing efforts and to design effective policies for the regulation of e-cigarette marketing content and placement. Methods: A sample of 417 nonsmoking youth (mean age = 15, SD = 1.3) were randomly assigned to either view four e-cigarette ads with low youth appeal, four e-cigarette ads with high youth appeal or four control ads. After exposure, participants completed covert and overt measurements of e-cigarette and tobacco cigarette attitudes and susceptibility to use. Results:Youth in an e-cigarette ad condition were more likely to select an e-cigarette item in a product choice task compared to control, and had more positive e-cigarette beliefs. Contrary to hypotheses, youth in the low youth appeal condition reported greater susceptibility to trying e-cigarettes and tobacco cigarettes compared to control. Conclusions: Exposure to any e-cigarette advertising may play a role in teens' decision to initiate e-cigarette and tobacco cigarette use. As the Food and Drug Administration now has regulatory authority over the marketing of e-cigarettes, regulations on e-cigarette advertising are suggested. Implications: Teens are increasingly being exposed to e-cigarette advertising, and many places are considering e-cigarette regulations, yet we know very little about how e-cigarette advertisements might influence youth tobacco use. This study utilized a novel dataset of e-cigarette ads coded for youth appeal and presented them to a sample of 417 nonsmoking teens in a randomized controlled design to test the effect of features on youth susceptibility to initiating e-cigarette and tobacco cigarette use. The findings inform evidence-based recommendations for regulating the marketing of e-cigarettes.
RCT Entities:
Introduction: Very little is known about how e-cigarette marketing is being perceived by youth, and the potential effect it will have on youth vaping and smoking behaviors. This limits the ability to identify youth-focused marketing efforts and to design effective policies for the regulation of e-cigarette marketing content and placement. Methods: A sample of 417 nonsmoking youth (mean age = 15, SD = 1.3) were randomly assigned to either view four e-cigarette ads with low youth appeal, four e-cigarette ads with high youth appeal or four control ads. After exposure, participants completed covert and overt measurements of e-cigarette and tobacco cigarette attitudes and susceptibility to use. Results: Youth in an e-cigarette ad condition were more likely to select an e-cigarette item in a product choice task compared to control, and had more positive e-cigarette beliefs. Contrary to hypotheses, youth in the low youth appeal condition reported greater susceptibility to trying e-cigarettes and tobacco cigarettes compared to control. Conclusions: Exposure to any e-cigarette advertising may play a role in teens' decision to initiate e-cigarette and tobacco cigarette use. As the Food and Drug Administration now has regulatory authority over the marketing of e-cigarettes, regulations on e-cigarette advertising are suggested. Implications: Teens are increasingly being exposed to e-cigarette advertising, and many places are considering e-cigarette regulations, yet we know very little about how e-cigarette advertisements might influence youth tobacco use. This study utilized a novel dataset of e-cigarette ads coded for youth appeal and presented them to a sample of 417 nonsmoking teens in a randomized controlled design to test the effect of features on youth susceptibility to initiating e-cigarette and tobacco cigarette use. The findings inform evidence-based recommendations for regulating the marketing of e-cigarettes.
Authors: Sara Pieters; William J Burk; Haske Van der Vorst; Reinout W Wiers; Rutger C M E Engels Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Andrea C Villanti; Jessica M Rath; Valerie F Williams; Jennifer L Pearson; Amanda Richardson; David B Abrams; Raymond S Niaura; Donna M Vallone Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: David R Strong; Sheri J Hartman; Jesse Nodora; Karen Messer; Lisa James; Martha White; David B Portnoy; Conrad J Choiniere; Genevieve C Vullo; John Pierce Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-12-06 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Dale S Mantey; Maria R Cooper; Stephanie L Clendennen; Keryn E Pasch; Cheryl L Perry Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Pallav Pokhrel; Pebbles Fagan; Thaddeus A Herzog; Qimei Chen; Nicholas Muranaka; Lisa Kehl; Jennifer B Unger Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Cheryl L Perry; MeLisa R Creamer; Benjamin W Chaffee; Jennifer B Unger; Erin L Sutfin; Grace Kong; Ce Shang; Stephanie L Clendennen; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Mary Ann Pentz Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Sarah Kahnert; Pete Driezen; James Balmford; Christina N Kyriakos; Tibor Demjén; Esteve Fernández; Paraskevi A Katsaounou; Antigona C Trofor; Krzysztof Przewoźniak; Witold A Zatoński; Geoffrey T Fong; Constantine I Vardavas; Ute Mons Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Andrew J Barnes; Rose S Bono; Alyssa K Rudy; Cosima Hoetger; Nicole E Nicksic; Caroline O Cobb Journal: Addiction Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Cynthia K Suerken; Jessica L King; Kimberly D Wiseman; Seth M Noar; Kimberly G Wagoner; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Tob Regul Sci Date: 2018-05
Authors: Elise M Stevens; Amanda L Johnson; Glenn Leshner; FuWei Sun; Seunghyun Kim; Eleanor L S Leavens; Alayna P Tackett; Emily T Hébert; Theodore L Wagener Journal: Tob Regul Sci Date: 2020-03
Authors: Elise M Stevens; Emily T Hébert; Brittney Keller-Hamilton; Summer G Frank-Pearce; Alayna P Tackett; Glenn Leshner; Theodore L Wagener Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Loren E Wold; Robert Tarran; Evan W Neczypor; Matthew J Mears; Arunava Ghosh; M Flori Sassano; Richard J Gumina Journal: Circulation Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 29.690