Kioa L Wijnsma1, Caroline Duineveld2, Elena B Volokhina1,3, Lambertus P van den Heuvel1,3,4, Nicole C A J van de Kar1, Jack F M Wetzels2. 1. Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
Background: Atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare but severe form of thrombotic microangiopathy as a consequence of complement dysregulation. aHUS has a poor outcome with high mortality and >50% of patients developing end-stage renal disease. Since the end of 2012, these outcomes have greatly improved with the introduction of eculizumab. Currently the duration of treatment is debated. Most guidelines advise lifelong treatment. However, there is no hard evidence to support this advice. Historically, a substantial number of aHUS patients were weaned of plasma therapy, often without disease recurrence. Moreover, the long-term consequences of eculizumab treatment are unknown. In this retrospective study we describe 20 patients who received a restrictive treatment regimen. Methods: All aHUS patients who presented in the Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, between 2012 and 2016 and who received eculizumab are described. Clinical, diagnostic and follow-up data were gathered and reviewed. Results: Twenty patients (14 adults, 6 children) with aHUS have received eculizumab. Eculizumab was tapered in all and stopped in 17 patients. aHUS recurrence occurred in five patients. Due to close monitoring, recurrence was detected early and eculizumab was restarted. No clinical sequela such as proteinuria or progressive kidney dysfunction was detected subsequently. In total, eculizumab has been discontinued in 13 patients without aHUS recurrence, of which 5 are event free for >1 year. With this strategy ∼€11.4 million have been saved. Conclusions: A restrictive eculizumab regimen in aHUS appears safe and effective. Prospective studies should further evaluate the most optimal treatment strategy.
Background: Atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare but severe form of thrombotic microangiopathy as a consequence of complement dysregulation. aHUS has a poor outcome with high mortality and >50% of patients developing end-stage renal disease. Since the end of 2012, these outcomes have greatly improved with the introduction of eculizumab. Currently the duration of treatment is debated. Most guidelines advise lifelong treatment. However, there is no hard evidence to support this advice. Historically, a substantial number of aHUS patients were weaned of plasma therapy, often without disease recurrence. Moreover, the long-term consequences of eculizumab treatment are unknown. In this retrospective study we describe 20 patients who received a restrictive treatment regimen. Methods: All aHUS patients who presented in the Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, between 2012 and 2016 and who received eculizumab are described. Clinical, diagnostic and follow-up data were gathered and reviewed. Results: Twenty patients (14 adults, 6 children) with aHUS have received eculizumab. Eculizumab was tapered in all and stopped in 17 patients. aHUS recurrence occurred in five patients. Due to close monitoring, recurrence was detected early and eculizumab was restarted. No clinical sequela such as proteinuria or progressive kidney dysfunction was detected subsequently. In total, eculizumab has been discontinued in 13 patients without aHUS recurrence, of which 5 are event free for >1 year. With this strategy ∼€11.4 million have been saved. Conclusions: A restrictive eculizumab regimen in aHUS appears safe and effective. Prospective studies should further evaluate the most optimal treatment strategy.
Authors: Shruti Chaturvedi; Noor Dhaliwal; Sarah Hussain; Kathryn Dane; Harshvardhan Upreti; Evan M Braunstein; Xuan Yuan; C John Sperati; Alison R Moliterno; Robert A Brodsky Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2021-03-09
Authors: Raquel Medeiros de Souza; Bernardo Henrique Mendes Correa; Paulo Henrique Moreira Melo; Pedro Antunes Pousa; Tamires Sara Campos de Mendonça; Lucas Gustavo Castelar Rodrigues; Ana Cristina Simões E Silva Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2022-07-21 Impact factor: 3.651
Authors: Jan Menne; Yahsou Delmas; Fadi Fakhouri; Christoph Licht; Åsa Lommelé; Enrico E Minetti; François Provôt; Eric Rondeau; Neil S Sheerin; Jimmy Wang; Laurent E Weekers; Larry A Greenbaum Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Merel L Kimman; Marlies S Wijsenbeek; Sander M J van Kuijk; Kioa L Wijnsma; Nicole C A J van de Kar; Marjolein Storm; Xana van Jaarsveld; Carmen D Dirksen Journal: Patient Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.883