Literature DB >> 2910637

Altered protein binding of etoposide in patients with cancer.

C F Stewart1, J A Pieper, S G Arbuck, W E Evans.   

Abstract

Etoposide plasma protein binding (PB) is reported to be 94% based on in vitro studies using normal human serum albumin (SA). Etoposide PB in 17 patients with cancer receiving etoposide (50 to 100 mg/m2) and in plasma of 14 volunteers was determined by equilibrium dialysis with 3H-etoposide. The unbound fraction (Fu) in patients with cancer was 0.139 +/- 0.099 compared with 0.043 +/- 0.0036 in plasma from normal volunteers (p less than 0.0009; t test). Etoposide binding ratio (BR) was correlated directly with SA (r2 = 0.83; p less than 0.05). In the population with cancer Fu was significantly correlated with bilirubin (r2 = 0.837; p less than 0.05). In a multivariate analysis, SA and bilirubin were significant predictors of Fu (r2 = 0.93; p less than 0.05). This study corroborates previous reports of etoposide PB in normal human serum and demonstrates altered PB in patients with abnormal serum albumin or bilirubin levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2910637     DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1989.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  15 in total

Review 1.  Disease-induced variations in plasma protein levels. Implications for drug dosage regimens (Part II).

Authors:  R Zini; P Riant; J Barré; J P Tillement
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Etoposide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in combination chemotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  J M Henwood; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Etoposide protein binding in cancer patients.

Authors:  B Liu; H M Earl; C J Poole; J Dunn; D J Kerr
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral etoposide.

Authors:  G Toffoli; G Corona; R Sorio; I Robieux; B Basso; A M Colussi; M Boiocchi
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Disposition of total and unbound etoposide following high-dose therapy.

Authors:  T L Schwinghammer; R A Fleming; C S Rosenfeld; D Przepiorka; R K Shadduck; E J Bloom; C F Stewart
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toffoli; Giuseppe Corona; Barbara Basso; Mauro Boiocchi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Practical treatment guide for dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  P Canal; E Chatelut; S Guichard
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Protein binding of brequinar in the plasma of healthy donors and cancer patients and analysis of the relationship between protein binding and pharmacokinetics in cancer patients.

Authors:  S Y King; A M Agra; H S Shen; C L Chi; D B Adams; V E Currie; J R Bertino; H J Pieniaszek; C Y Quon
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 9.  Disposition of antineoplastic agents in the very young child.

Authors:  H L McLeod; M V Relling; W R Crom; K Silverstein; S Groom; J H Rodman; G K Rivera; W M Crist; W E Evans
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1992-08

Review 10.  Use of etoposide in patients with organ dysfunction: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  C F Stewart
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.