Literature DB >> 2910631

Breastfeeding among low-income, high-risk women.

L K Grossman1, J B Larsen-Alexander, S M Fitzsimmons, L Cordero.   

Abstract

Data from a state supported project providing multidiscipline (clinical social work, nursing, nutrition, obstetrics, and pediatrics) assistance to low-income women judged to be at high perinatal risk by medical and social history were analyzed regarding infant feeding decisions. Data from 2,124 subjects delivered from 1976 to 1985 were available for analysis. The population tended to be single (77%), black (66%), poorly educated (63% less than a high school education), and young (mean age 21.8 years). Thirty-six percent were primiparas. The decision to breastfeed was associated with white race, older maternal age, higher educational level, marriage, and earlier utilization of prenatal care. Prenatal infant feeding plans were compared with actual postpartum decisions for 1,168 women. Only 3 percent of those initially planning to bottle feed changed their minds postpartum and breastfed although 31 percent of those initially planning to nurse ultimately chose artificial feeding. Ten percent of women were initially undecided; one-third of this group ultimately breastfed, two-thirds bottle fed. Overall the percentage of women in the project who were breastfeeding rose from 15 percent to 22 percent from the early to later years of the project (p less than 0.0001).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age Factors; Americas; Behavior; Blacks; Bottle Feeding; Breast Feeding; Cultural Background; Decision Making; Delivery Of Health Care; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Economic Factors; Educational Status; Ethnic Groups; Fertility; Fertility Measurements; Health; Health Services; High Risk Women; Incidence--changes; Infant Nutrition; Low Income Population; Marital Status; Maternal Health Services; Maternal-child Health Services; Measurement; North America; Northern America; Nuptiality; Nutrition; Ohio; Parity; Population; Population Characteristics; Population Dynamics; Prenatal Care; Primary Health Care; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Social Class; Socioeconomic Factors; Socioeconomic Status; United States; Whites

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2910631     DOI: 10.1177/000992288902800109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)        ISSN: 0009-9228            Impact factor:   1.168


  5 in total

1.  Factors associated with intention to breastfeed among low-income, inner-city pregnant women.

Authors:  Helen J Lee; Margarita R Rubio; Irma T Elo; Kelly F McCollum; Esther K Chung; Jennifer F Culhane
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-09

2.  Psychosocial predictors of primiparous breastfeeding initiation and duration.

Authors:  Meagan E Mathews; Esther M Leerkes; Cheryl A Lovelady; Jeffrey D Labban
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.219

3.  Influences on breastfeeding rates in low income communities in Ontario.

Authors:  S Evers; L Doran; K Schellenberg
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1998 May-Jun

4.  Factors influencing infant feeding method in an urban community.

Authors:  Vivienne A Rose; Verlyn O F Warrington; Roland Linder; Connie S Williams
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Predictors of the early introduction of solid foods in infants: results of a cohort study.

Authors:  Jane A Scott; Colin W Binns; Kathleen I Graham; Wendy H Oddy
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 2.125

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.