Literature DB >> 2910619

Percutaneous automated discectomy. A new approach to lumbar surgery.

J C Maroon1, G Onik, L Sternau.   

Abstract

An automated technique for percutaneous lumbar discectomy applies the principle of suction cutting. The indications are leg pain greater than back pain (sciatica) and failure of all conservative therapy. The typical neurological and roentgenographic abnormalities of a contained herniated lumbar disc are mandatory. The procedure is performed with a Nucleotome (Surgical Dynamics, San Leandro, California) that is a specially designed, 2-mm blunt-tipped suction-cutting device inserted via a posterolateral approach into the affected disc using fluoroscopic control. The results that can be expected with the technique are similar to chymopapain and are in the 70% success range. Automated percutaneous discectomy has a demonstrably low morbidity and can be performed under local anesthesia on an outpatient basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2910619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of a minimally invasive procedure versus standard microscopic discotomy: a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Jörg Franke; R Greiner-Perth; H Boehm; K Mahlfeld; H Grasshoff; Y Allam; F Awiszus
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy with and without chymopapain pretreatment versus non-automated discoscopy-monitored percutaneous lumbar discectomy. An experimental study in human cadaver spines.

Authors:  M Pfeiffer; T Schäfer; P Griss; H D Mennel; D Arndt; K Henkel
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  Clinical efficacy of imaging modalities in the diagnosis of low-back pain disorders.

Authors:  N Boos; P H Lander
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous automated lumbar nucleotomy. Comparison with traditional macro-procedure discectomy.

Authors:  R Dullerud; H Lie; B Magnæs
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  C A Helms; G Onik; G W Davis
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Success and failure after surgery of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine: an operational definition based on satisfaction, pain, and disability from a prospective cohort.

Authors:  Albert V B Brasil; Maiara Anschau Floriani; Ericson Sfreddo; Tobias Ludwig do Nascimento; Andriele Abreu Castro; Luana Giongo Pedrotti; Marina Bessel; Juçara Gasparetto Maccari; Mohamed Parrini Mutlaq; Luiz Antonio Nasi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.562

7.  Percutaneous nucleotomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation results after a mean follow-up of 2 years.

Authors:  E Kotilainen; S Valtonen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Lumbar disc reherniation after transforaminal lumbar endoscopic discectomy.

Authors:  Thomas A Kosztowski; David Choi; Jared Fridley; Michael Galgano; Ziya Gokaslan; Adetokunbo Oyelese; Albert Edward Telfeian
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

9.  The immediate and long-term effects of exercise and patient education on physical, functional, and quality-of-life outcome measures after single-level lumbar microdiscectomy: a randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  David M Selkowitz; Kornelia Kulig; Elizabeth M Poppert; Sean P Flanagan; Ndidiamaka D Matthews; George J Beneck; John M Popovich; Jose R Lona; Kimiko A Yamada; Wendy S Burke; Carolyn Ervin; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.