OBJECTIVES: To study the influence of quality of life on the decision to admit patients attended for exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in a hospital emergency department (ED) and to explore the association with poor outcome at 2 months. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study of a cohort of patients with exacerbated COPD attended in an ED between November 2011 and September 2012. We collected sociodemographic and clinical data as well as scores on the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), the modified scale of the Medical Research Council, and the Borg scale for Perceived Dyspnea at the following times: baseline (clinically stable) (t0), on exacerbation (emergency) (t1), 15 days later or on discharge (t2), and 2 months after the emergency (t3). The outcome measures were hospital admission, revisits to the ED, and readmission within 2 months of the exacerbation. RESULTS: A total of 191 patients treated for exacerbated COPD were included. The mean (SD) age was 74.9 (10.2) years; 173 (90.6%) were men. The exacerbations were mild in 97 cases (56.4%). The median (interquartile range) CAT scores were 14.5 (9-21), 20 (15-28), 16 (10-22), and 14.5 (10-21) at t0, t1, t2 and t3, respectively. One hundred twenty-three patients (64.4%) were admitted, 68 (35.6%) revisited the ED, and 39 (20.4%) were readmitted within 2 months. A high level of disease impact on quality of life at t1 (vs low impact) was independently associated with hospital admission (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.7; 95% CI, 1.0-13.2; P=.043). Impact on t2 was associated with a revisit within 2 months (adjusted OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1-11.7; P=.031). Minimal change between the t1 and t2 CAT scores was independently associated with an ED revisit within 2 months (adjusted OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-7.4; P=.023). When the data for patients discharged from the ED were analyzed separately from those for admitted patients, the differences were statistically significant only for those who had been hospitalized. CONCLUSION: The CAT score could be useful for predicting hospital admissions and revisiting within 2 months, especially in patients admitted for exacerbated COPD.
OBJECTIVES: To study the influence of quality of life on the decision to admit patients attended for exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in a hospital emergency department (ED) and to explore the association with poor outcome at 2 months. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study of a cohort of patients with exacerbated COPD attended in an ED between November 2011 and September 2012. We collected sociodemographic and clinical data as well as scores on the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), the modified scale of the Medical Research Council, and the Borg scale for Perceived Dyspnea at the following times: baseline (clinically stable) (t0), on exacerbation (emergency) (t1), 15 days later or on discharge (t2), and 2 months after the emergency (t3). The outcome measures were hospital admission, revisits to the ED, and readmission within 2 months of the exacerbation. RESULTS: A total of 191 patients treated for exacerbated COPD were included. The mean (SD) age was 74.9 (10.2) years; 173 (90.6%) were men. The exacerbations were mild in 97 cases (56.4%). The median (interquartile range) CAT scores were 14.5 (9-21), 20 (15-28), 16 (10-22), and 14.5 (10-21) at t0, t1, t2 and t3, respectively. One hundred twenty-three patients (64.4%) were admitted, 68 (35.6%) revisited the ED, and 39 (20.4%) were readmitted within 2 months. A high level of disease impact on quality of life at t1 (vs low impact) was independently associated with hospital admission (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.7; 95% CI, 1.0-13.2; P=.043). Impact on t2 was associated with a revisit within 2 months (adjusted OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1-11.7; P=.031). Minimal change between the t1 and t2 CAT scores was independently associated with an ED revisit within 2 months (adjusted OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-7.4; P=.023). When the data for patients discharged from the ED were analyzed separately from those for admitted patients, the differences were statistically significant only for those who had been hospitalized. CONCLUSION: The CAT score could be useful for predicting hospital admissions and revisiting within 2 months, especially in patients admitted for exacerbated COPD.
Entities:
Keywords:
Calidad de vida; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); Departamento de emergencias; Disease exacerbation; Emergency department; Enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC); Exacerbación aguda; Quality of life
Authors: J González Del Castillo; F J Candel; J de la Fuente; F Gordo; F J Martín-Sánchez; R Menéndez; A Mujal; J Barberán Journal: Rev Esp Quimioter Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 1.553
Authors: Maria Jose Abadias Medrano; Oriol Yuguero Torres; Ignasi Bardés Robles; Luis Fernando Casas-Méndez; Ferran Barbé; Jordi de Batlle Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 1.817