Literature DB >> 29105972

Sterilization effects on ultrathin film polymer coatings for silicon-based implantable medical devices.

Zohora Iqbal1, Willieford Moses2, Steven Kim3, Eun Jung Kim1, William H Fissell4, Shuvo Roy1.   

Abstract

Novel biomaterials for medical device applications must be stable throughout all stages of preparation for surgery, including sterilization. There is a paucity of information on the effects of sterilization on sub-10 nm-thick polymeric surface coatings suitable for silicon-based bioartificial organs. This study explores the effect of five standard sterilization methods on three surface coatings applied to silicon: polyethylene glycol (PEG), poly(sulfobetaine methacrylate) (pSBMA), and poly (2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) (pMPC). Autoclave, dry heat, hydrogen peroxide (H2 O2 ) plasma, ethylene oxide gas (EtO), and electron beam (E-beam) treated coatings were analyzed to determine possible polymer degradation with sterilization. Poststerilization, there were significant alterations in contact angle, maximum change resulting from H2 O2 (Δ - 14°), autoclave (Δ + 15°), and dry heat (Δ + 23°) treatments for PEG, pSBMA, and pMPC, respectively. Less than 5% coating thickness change was found with autoclave and EtO on PEG-silicon, E-beam on pSBMA-silicon and EtO treatment on pMPC-silicon. H2 O2 treatment resulted in at least 30% decrease in thickness for all coatings. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays showed significant protein adsorption increase for pMPC-silicon following all sterilization methods. E-beam on PEG-silicon and dry-heat treatment on pSBMA-silicon exhibited maximum protein adsorption in each coating subset. Overall, the data suggest autoclave and EtO treatments are well-suited for PEG-silicon, while E-beam is best suited for pSBMA-silicon. pMPC-silicon was least impacted by EtO treatment. H2 O2 treatment had a negative effect on all three coatings. These results can be used to determine which surface modifications and sterilization processes to utilize for devices in vivo.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 106B: 2327-2336, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  nonfouling surface coatings; polyethylene glycol; silicon; sterilization; sulfobetaine methacrylate); ultrathin zwitterionic polymer (phosphorylcholine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29105972      PMCID: PMC5936672          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  29 in total

Review 1.  Micromachined interfaces: new approaches in cell immunoisolation and biomolecular separation.

Authors:  T A Desai; D J Hansford; M Ferrari
Journal:  Biomol Eng       Date:  2000-10

2.  Evaluation of MEMS materials of construction for implantable medical devices.

Authors:  Geoffrey Kotzar; Mark Freas; Phillip Abel; Aaron Fleischman; Shuvo Roy; Christian Zorman; James M Moran; Jeff Melzak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  XPS and AFM analysis of antifouling PEG interfaces for microfabricated silicon biosensors.

Authors:  Sadhana Sharma; Robert W Johnson; Tejal A Desai
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 10.618

4.  Charge- and size-based separation of macromolecules using ultrathin silicon membranes.

Authors:  Christopher C Striemer; Thomas R Gaborski; James L McGrath; Philippe M Fauchet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The effect of sterilization processes on the bioadhesive properties and surface chemistry of a plasma-polymerized polyethylene glycol film: XPS characterization and L929 cell proliferation tests.

Authors:  Frédéric Brétagnol; Hubert Rauscher; Marina Hasiwa; Ondrej Kylián; Giaccomo Ceccone; Len Hazell; Alan J Paul; Olivier Lefranc; François Rossi
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Silicon induces minimal thromboinflammatory response during 28-day intravascular implant testing.

Authors:  Melissa E Melvin; William H Fissell; Shuvo Roy; David L Brown
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.872

7.  Anti-biofouling Sulfobetaine Polymer Thin Films on Silicon and Silicon Nanopore Membranes.

Authors:  Lingyan Li; Roger E Marchant; Anna Dubnisheva; Shuvo Roy; William H Fissell
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.517

8.  Competitive protein adsorption on biomaterial surface studied with reflectometric interference spectroscopy.

Authors:  Yan Huang; Xiaoying Lü; Weiping Qian; Zuming Tang; Yinping Zhong
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Proteins and cells on PEG immobilized silicon surfaces.

Authors:  M Zhang; T Desai; M Ferrari
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Zwitterionic hydrogels: an in vivo implantation study.

Authors:  Zheng Zhang; Timothy Chao; Lingyun Liu; Gang Cheng; Buddy D Ratner; Shaoyi Jiang
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.517

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Modulating the foreign body response of implants for diabetes treatment.

Authors:  Bhushan N Kharbikar; Gauree S Chendke; Tejal A Desai
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 17.873

Review 2.  Nanotechnology in Kidney and Islet Transplantation: An Ongoing, Promising Field.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Ya Teng; Ji-Ji Xue; Hong-Kai Cai; Yu-Biao Pan; Xing-Nan Ye; Xin-Li Mao; Shao-Wei Li
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 3.  Biomimetic materials based on zwitterionic polymers toward human-friendly medical devices.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Ishihara
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 7.821

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.