Robert Wakolbinger1,2, Martin Diers3,4, Laura A Hruby1, Agnes Sturma1,5, Oskar C Aszmann1,6. 1. Christian Doppler Laboratory for Restoration of Extremity Function and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Danube Hospital-Social Medical Center East, Vienna, Austria. 3. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LWL University Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. 4. Department of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health/Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany. 5. Health Assisting Engineering, University of Applied Sciences FH Campus, Vienna, Austria. 6. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Phantom limb pain (PLP) affects a high percentage of amputees. Since treatment options are limited, low quality of life and addiction to pain medication frequently occur. New treatments, such as mirror therapy or electrical sensory discrimination training, make use of the brain's plasticity to alleviate this centrally derived pain. AIM: This pilot study assessed the question of whether home-based tactile discrimination training (TDT) leads to a stronger decrease in PLP levels compared to standard massage treatment. DESIGN: Controlled study. SETTING: Outpatient. POPULATION: Amputees (upper/lower extremity) with a PLP score of 4 or higher out of a possible 10 points on the visual analog scale. METHODS: Eight patients participated in the study. The treatment phase comprised 2 weeks (15 minutes daily). Subjects were examined at baseline, after treatment, 2 weeks after completing treatment, and 4 weeks after completing treatment. Pain was assessed using the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory. RESULTS: There was a significantly stronger reduction in PLP in the treatment group receiving TDT. PLP intensity ratings were significantly reduced at the end of therapy, and at 2 and 4 weeks after completing treatment compared to pretreatment. CONCLUSIONS: TDT seems to be an easy, cheap, time-effective, and safe method to achieve sustained alleviation of PLP and also brings about a positive change in body image. REHABILITATION IMPACT: Home-based TDT could achieve a sustained reduction in PLP and should be considered as a possible alternative to established treatment methods.
BACKGROUND: Phantom limb pain (PLP) affects a high percentage of amputees. Since treatment options are limited, low quality of life and addiction to pain medication frequently occur. New treatments, such as mirror therapy or electrical sensory discrimination training, make use of the brain's plasticity to alleviate this centrally derived pain. AIM: This pilot study assessed the question of whether home-based tactile discrimination training (TDT) leads to a stronger decrease in PLP levels compared to standard massage treatment. DESIGN: Controlled study. SETTING:Outpatient. POPULATION: Amputees (upper/lower extremity) with a PLP score of 4 or higher out of a possible 10 points on the visual analog scale. METHODS: Eight patients participated in the study. The treatment phase comprised 2 weeks (15 minutes daily). Subjects were examined at baseline, after treatment, 2 weeks after completing treatment, and 4 weeks after completing treatment. Pain was assessed using the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory. RESULTS: There was a significantly stronger reduction in PLP in the treatment group receiving TDT. PLP intensity ratings were significantly reduced at the end of therapy, and at 2 and 4 weeks after completing treatment compared to pretreatment. CONCLUSIONS: TDT seems to be an easy, cheap, time-effective, and safe method to achieve sustained alleviation of PLP and also brings about a positive change in body image. REHABILITATION IMPACT: Home-based TDT could achieve a sustained reduction in PLP and should be considered as a possible alternative to established treatment methods.
Authors: Nick A Olthof; Michel W Coppieters; G Lorimer Moseley; Michele Sterling; Dylan J Chippindall; Daniel S Harvie Journal: PeerJ Date: 2021-10-25 Impact factor: 2.984