Literature DB >> 29105912

How much do direct livestock emissions actually contribute to global warming?

Andy Reisinger1, Harry Clark1.   

Abstract

Agriculture directly contributes about 10%-12% of current global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, mostly from livestock. However, such percentage estimates are based on global warming potentials (GWPs), which do not measure the actual warming caused by emissions and ignore the fact that methane does not accumulate in the atmosphere in the same way as CO2 . Here, we employ a simple carbon cycle-climate model, historical estimates and future projections of livestock emissions to infer the fraction of actual warming that is attributable to direct livestock non-CO2 emissions now and in future, and to CO2 from pasture conversions, without relying on GWPs. We find that direct livestock non-CO2 emissions caused about 19% of the total modelled warming of 0.81°C from all anthropogenic sources in 2010. CO2 from pasture conversions contributed at least another 0.03°C, bringing the warming directly attributable to livestock to 23% of the total warming in 2010. The significance of direct livestock emissions to future warming depends strongly on global actions to reduce emissions from other sectors. Direct non-CO2 livestock emissions would contribute only about 5% of the warming in 2100 if emissions from other sectors increase unabated, but could constitute as much as 18% (0.27°C) of the warming in 2100 if global CO2 emissions from other sectors are reduced to near or below zero by 2100, consistent with the goal of limiting warming to well below 2°C. These estimates constitute a lower bound since indirect emissions linked to livestock feed production and supply chains were not included. Our estimates demonstrate that expanding the mitigation potential and realizing substantial reductions of direct livestock non-CO2 emissions through demand and supply side measures can make an important contribution to achieve the stringent mitigation goals set out in the Paris Agreement, including by increasing the carbon budget consistent with the 1.5°C goal.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1.5°C warming; Paris Agreement; attribution; climate change metrics; global warming potential; livestock; non-CO2 mitigation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29105912     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  21 in total

1.  Climate impacts of cultured meat and beef cattle.

Authors:  John Lynch; Raymond Pierrehumbert
Journal:  Front Sustain Food Syst       Date:  2019-02-19

2.  Effect of Paulownia Leaves Extract Levels on In Vitro Ruminal Fermentation, Microbial Population, Methane Production, and Fatty Acid Biohydrogenation.

Authors:  Bogumiła Nowak; Barbara Moniuszko-Szajwaj; Maria Skorupka; Julia Puchalska; Martyna Kozłowska; Jan Bocianowski; Paweł Antoni Kołodziejski; Małgorzata Szumacher-Strabel; Amlan Kumar Patra; Anna Stochmal; Adam Cieslak
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 4.927

Review 3.  A Retrospective Literature Evaluation of the Integration of Stress Physiology Indices, Animal Welfare and Climate Change Assessment of Livestock.

Authors:  Edward Narayan; Michelle Barreto; Georgia-Constantina Hantzopoulou; Alan Tilbrook
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Genome-wide association identifies methane production level relation to genetic control of digestive tract development in dairy cows.

Authors:  M Pszczola; T Strabel; S Mucha; E Sell-Kubiak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Use of Lactic Acid Bacteria to Reduce Methane Production in Ruminants, a Critical Review.

Authors:  Natasha Doyle; Philiswa Mbandlwa; William J Kelly; Graeme Attwood; Yang Li; R Paul Ross; Catherine Stanton; Sinead Leahy
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  One Health of Peripheries: Biopolitics, Social Determination, and Field of Praxis.

Authors:  Oswaldo Santos Baquero
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-06-30

Review 7.  Sustaining planetary health through systems thinking: Public health's critical role.

Authors:  Hari S Iyer; Nicole V DeVille; Olivia Stoddard; Jennifer Cole; Samuel S Myers; Huichu Li; Elise G Elliott; Marcia P Jimenez; Peter James; Christopher D Golden
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2021-06-11

Review 8.  Carbon myopia: The urgent need for integrated social, economic and environmental action in the livestock sector.

Authors:  Matthew Tom Harrison; Brendan Richard Cullen; Dianne Elizabeth Mayberry; Annette Louise Cowie; Franco Bilotto; Warwick Brabazon Badgery; Ke Liu; Thomas Davison; Karen Michelle Christie; Albert Muleke; Richard John Eckard
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-08-29       Impact factor: 13.211

9.  Cultivation and sequencing of rumen microbiome members from the Hungate1000 Collection.

Authors:  Rekha Seshadri; Sinead C Leahy; Graeme T Attwood; Koon Hoong Teh; Suzanne C Lambie; Adrian L Cookson; Emiley A Eloe-Fadrosh; Georgios A Pavlopoulos; Michalis Hadjithomas; Neha J Varghese; David Paez-Espino; Rechelle Perry; Gemma Henderson; Christopher J Creevey; Nicolas Terrapon; Pascal Lapebie; Elodie Drula; Vincent Lombard; Edward Rubin; Nikos C Kyrpides; Bernard Henrissat; Tanja Woyke; Natalia N Ivanova; William J Kelly
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Availability of disaggregated greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle production: a systematic review.

Authors:  John Lynch
Journal:  Environ Impact Assess Rev       Date:  2019-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.