Literature DB >> 29104878

A Practical Scoring System to Select Optimally Sized Devices for Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure.

Joseph M Venturini1, Elizabeth M Retzer1, J Raider Estrada1, Anuj Mediratta1, Janet Friant1, Sandeep Nathan1, Jonathan D Paul1, John Blair1, Roberto M Lang1, Atman P Shah1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been linked to cryptogenic stroke, and closure has been reported to improve clinical outcomes. However, there are no clear guidelines to direct device sizing. This study sought to use patient characteristics and echocardiographic findings to create a prediction score for device sizing.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients undergoing percutaneous PFO closure at our institution between July 2010 and December 2014. Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded, and all pre- and intraprocedural echocardiography results were evaluated.
RESULTS: Thirty-six patients underwent percutaneous PFO closure during the study period. All procedures were performed using an Amplatzer Septal Occluder "Cribriform" (ASOC) device in one of three disc diameters: 25, 30, or 35 mm. Closure was indicated for cryptogenic stroke/transient ischemic attack in 75% of cases. Every case (100%) was successful with durable shunt correction at the 6-month follow-up without complications of erosion or device embolization. The presence of atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) (p = 0.027) and PFO tunnel length >10 mm (p = 0.038) were independently associated with increased device size. A scoring system of 1 point for male sex, 1 point for ASA, and 1 point for PFO tunnel >10 mm long was associated with the size of closure device implanted (p = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: A simple scoring system may be used to select an optimally sized device for percutaneous PFO closure using the ASOC device.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Device sizing; Patent foramen ovale; Percutaneous closure

Year:  2016        PMID: 29104878      PMCID: PMC5665399          DOI: 10.12945/j.jshd.2016.009.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Struct Heart Dis


  23 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in stroke attributable to patent foramen ovale: significance of concomitant atrial septum aneurysm.

Authors:  Leo H Bonati; Arnheid Kessel-Schaefer; André Z Linka; Peter Buser; Stephan G Wetzel; Ernst-Wilhelm Radue; Philippe A Lyrer; Stefan T Engelter
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Atrial right-to-left shunting causing severe hypoxaemia despite normal right-sided pressures. Report of 11 consecutive cases corrected by percutaneous closure.

Authors:  F Godart; C Rey; A Prat; A Vincentelli; A Chmaït; C Francart; H Porte
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Patent foramen ovale in young stroke patients.

Authors:  M W Webster; A M Chancellor; H J Smith; D L Swift; D N Sharpe; N M Bass; G L Glasgow
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-07-02       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Anthony J Furlan; Mark Reisman; Joseph Massaro; Laura Mauri; Harold Adams; Gregory W Albers; Robert Felberg; Howard Herrmann; Saibal Kar; Michael Landzberg; Albert Raizner; Lawrence Wechsler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Prevalence of potential risk factors for stroke assessed by transesophageal echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography: the SPARC study. Stroke Prevention: Assessment of Risk in a Community.

Authors:  I Meissner; J P Whisnant; B K Khandheria; P C Spittell; W M O'Fallon; R D Pascoe; M Enriquez-Sarano; J B Seward; J L Covalt; J D Sicks; D O Wiebers
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Incidence and predictors of atrial fibrillation following transcatheter closure of interatrial septal communications using contemporary devices.

Authors:  Philipp Wagdi
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Long-term experience and outcomes with transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Ignacio Inglessis; Sammy Elmariah; Pablo A Rengifo-Moreno; Ronan Margey; Caitlin O'Callaghan; Ignacio Cruz-Gonzalez; Suzanne Baron; Praveen Mehrotra; Timothy C Tan; Judy Hung; Zareh N Demirjian; Ferdinando S Buonanno; MingMing Ning; Scott B Silverman; Roberto J Cubeddu; Eugene Pomerantsev; Robert M Schainfeld; G William Dec; Igor F Palacios
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 8.  Embolization of patent foramen ovale closure devices: incidence, role of imaging in identification, potential causes, and management.

Authors:  Sachin S Goel; Olcay Aksoy; E Murat Tuzcu; Richard A Krasuski; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2013

9.  Late results after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale for secondary prevention of paradoxical embolism using the amplatzer PFO occluder without intraprocedural echocardiography: effect of device size.

Authors:  Andreas Wahl; Tony Tai; Fabien Praz; Markus Schwerzmann; Christian Seiler; Krassen Nedeltchev; Stephan Windecker; Heinrich P Mattle; Bernhard Meier
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 11.195

10.  Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke.

Authors:  John D Carroll; Jeffrey L Saver; David E Thaler; Richard W Smalling; Scott Berry; Lee A MacDonald; David S Marks; David L Tirschwell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cardiac tamponade following aortic root erosion by an Amplatzer PFO-Occluder in a 41-year-old woman: Only a matter of sizing?

Authors:  Holger H Sigusch; Berit Zimmermann; Thomas Kuntze; Jens Gerth
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2020-11-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.