| Literature DB >> 29104744 |
Vishakha Kelkar1, Kushal Tuckley2, Hitesh Nemade3.
Abstract
In telemedicine systems, critical medical data is shared on a public communication channel. This increases the risk of unauthorised access to patient's information. This underlines the importance of secrecy and authentication for the medical data. This paper presents two innovative variations of classical histogram shift methods to increase the hiding capacity. The first technique divides the image into nonoverlapping blocks and embeds the watermark individually using the histogram method. The second method separates the region of interest and embeds the watermark only in the region of noninterest. This approach preserves the medical information intact. This method finds its use in critical medical cases. The high PSNR (above 45 dB) obtained for both techniques indicates imperceptibility of the approaches. Experimental results illustrate superiority of the proposed approaches when compared with other methods based on histogram shifting techniques. These techniques improve embedding capacity by 5-15% depending on the image type, without affecting the quality of the watermarked image. Both techniques also enable lossless reconstruction of the watermark and the host medical image. A higher embedding capacity makes the proposed approaches attractive for medical image watermarking applications without compromising the quality of the image.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29104744 PMCID: PMC5635467 DOI: 10.1155/2017/3538979
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Original medical image.
Figure 2Watermark image.
Figure 3Watermarked image.
Figure 4Watermarked image for block size 4 × 4.
Figure 5Image with the region of interest (ROI).
Figure 6Watermark embedded in the RONI.
Results of the classical histogram shift technique.
| Images | Image size | Hiding capacity | MSE | PSNR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cover1 | 900 × 854 | 44,417 | 0.9831 | 47.92 |
| Cover2 | 1002 × 1132 | 36,947 | 1.086 | 47.49 |
| Cover3 | 544 × 304 | 37,651 | 1.076 | 47.53 |
Comparison of the hiding capacity for novel variants with the classical histogram shift technique.
| Image | Image size | Hiding capacity in bits (histogram shift) | Block-wise histogram shift in bits (4 × 4) | Block-wise histogram shift in bits (8 × 8) | Block-wise histogram shift in bits (16 × 16) | Embedding in non-ROI in bits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cover1 | 900 × 854 | 44,417 | 48,164 | 46,201 | 45,367 | 44,494 |
| Cover2 | 1002 × 1132 | 36,947 | 42,258 | 39,567 | 38,253 | 37,103 |
| Cover3 | 544 × 304 | 37,651 | 43,784 | 41,211 | 39,499 | 37,862 |
MSE, PSNR, and MSSIM values for the block-wise embedding technique.
| Images | Block size 4 × 4 | Block size 8 × 8 | Block size 16 × 16 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSE | PSNR | SSIM | MSE | PSNR | SSIM | MSE | PSNR | SSIM | |
| Cover1 | 0.8266 | 48.68 | 0.9149 | 0.8481 | 48.56 | 0.9146 | 0.8831 | 48.39 | 0.9148 |
| Cover2 | 0.7822 | 49.02 | 0.9273 | 0.7962 | 48.96 | 0.9297 | 0.8187 | 48.82 | 0.9271 |
| Cover3 | 0.7668 | 49.28 | 0.9325 | 0.7766 | 49.23 | 0.9321 | 0.8022 | 49.08 | 0.9317 |
MSE, PSNR, and MSSIM values for the technique using non-ROI.
| Image name | MSE | PSNR | MSSIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cover1 | 0.6013 | 49.99 | 0.9386 |
| Cover2 | 0.3431 | 52.63 | 0.9659 |
| Cover3 | 0.5292 | 50.72 | 0.9476 |