| Literature DB >> 29104341 |
Biying Chen1,2, Sheng Xu1,3, Gordon T Cook1, Stewart P H T Freeman1, Xiaolin Hou4, Cong-Qiang Liu2, Philip Naysmith1, Katsuhiko Yamaguchi3.
Abstract
Radiocarbon (14C) has been measured in single tree ring samples collected from the southwest of the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant. Our data indicate south-westwards dispersion of radiocarbon and the highest 14C activity observed so far in the local environment during the 2011 accident. The abnormally high 14C activity in the late wood of 2011 ring may imply an unknown source of radiocarbon nearby after the accident. The influence of 14C shrank from 30 km during normal reactor operation to 14 km for the accident in the northwest of FDNPP, but remains unclear in the southwest.Entities:
Keywords: Fukushima Nuclear Reactor accident; Radiocarbon; Tree rings
Year: 2017 PMID: 29104341 PMCID: PMC5658471 DOI: 10.1007/s10967-017-5459-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Radioanal Nucl Chem ISSN: 0236-5731 Impact factor: 1.371
Fig. 1Map showing sampling site in the vicinity of the FDNPP. The solid and open squares represent the new sampling sites and the previous sampling locations [14, 16], respectively. IWA Iwaki, YAM Yamakiya, SHI Shimotsushima, OKA Ogaki, TAK Takase, FUT Futuba, OKU Okuma, OKN Okuma-N, TOM Tomioka
Analytical 14C activity of tree rings from Fukushima, Japan
| Lab code | Year | Wood fraction | δ13C (‰) | F14C (fraction modern) | ∆14C (‰) | Background ∆14C (‰) | Excess ∆14C (‰) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Okuma (OKU, 37°24′47.1″N, 141°01′34.7″E, SW 1 km of FDNPP) | |||||||
| 63065a | 2012 | Whole ring | −26.1 | 1.0476 ± 0.0022 | 47.6 ± 2.2 | 31.5 ± 2.0 | 16.1 ± 4.2 |
| 63066a | 2011 | Whole ring | −26.3 | 1.0403 ± 0.0020 | 40.3 ± 2.0 | 39.0 ± 2.4 | 1.3 ± 4.4 |
| 68802 | 2011 | Late ring | −25.8 | 1.0354 ± 0.0019 | 35.4 ± 1.9 | 39.0 ± 2.4 | −3.6 ± 4.3 |
| 68803 | 2011 | Early ring | −25.0 | 1.0395 ± 0.0022 | 39.5 ± 2.2 | 39.0 ± 2.4 | 0.5 ± 4.6 |
| 63067a | 2010 | Whole ring | −25.8 | 1.1803 ± 0.0023 | 180.3 ± 2.3 | 40.0 ± 2.7 | 140.3 ± 5.0 |
| 68804 | 2010 | Late ring | −25.5 | 1.1804 ± 0.0025 | 180.4 ± 2.5 | 40.0 ± 2.7 | 140.4 ± 5.2 |
| 68805 | 2010 | Early ring | −26.2 | 1.1230 ± 0.0021 | 123.0 ± 2.1 | 40.0 ± 2.7 | 83.0 ± 4.8 |
| 2. Okuma-N-1 (OKN-1, 37°24′27.6″N, 141°00′56.8″E, SW 2 km of FDNPP) | |||||||
| 70660 | 2012 | Whole ring | −22.7 | 1.0435 ± 0.0021 | 43.5 ± 2.1 | 31.5 ± 2.0 | 12.0 ± 4.1 |
| 70661 | 2011 | Late ring | −23.0 | 1.2864 ± 0.0026 | 286.4 ± 2.6 | 39.0 ± 2.4 | 247.4 ± 5.0 |
| 70666 | 2011 | Early ring | −22.6 | 1.2266 ± 0.0025 | 226.6 ± 2.5 | 39.0 ± 2.4 | 187.6 ± 4.9 |
| 3. Okuma-N-2 (OKN-2, 37°24′27.6″N, 141°00′56.8″E, SW 2 km of FDNPP) | |||||||
| 68772 | 2012 | Whole ring | −24.7 | 1.0454 ± 0.0022 | 45.4 ± 2.2 | 31.5 ± 2.0 | 13.9 ± 4.2 |
| 68774 | 2011 | Late ring | −24.3 | 1.3121 ± 0.0028 | 312.1 ± 2.8 | 39.0 ± 2.4 | 273.1 ± 5.2 |
| 68773 | 2011 | Early ring | −24.3 | 1.2215 ± 0.0026 | 221.5 ± 2.6 | 39.0 ± 2.4 | 182.5 ± 5.0 |
| 68776 | 2010 | Late ring | −24.5 | 1.0986 ± 0.0020 | 98.6 ± 2.0 | 40.0 ± 2.7 | 58.6 ± 4.7 |
| 68775 | 2010 | Early ring | −25.0 | 1.1750 ± 0.0031 | 175.0 ± 3.1 | 40.0 ± 2.7 | 135.0 ± 5.8 |
| 4. Tomioka-1 (TOM-1, 37°20′33.0″N, 141°00′16.5″E, SSW 9 km of FDNPP) | |||||||
| 68782 | 2012 | Whole ring | −24.4 | 1.0302 ± 0.0020 | 30.2 ± 2.0 | 31.5 ± 2.0 | −1.3 ± 4.0 |
| 68783 | 2011 | Late ring | −24.4 | 1.0594 ± 0.0022 | 59.4 ± 2.2 | 39.0 ± 2.4 | 20.4 ± 4.6 |
| 68784 | 2011 | Early ring | −23.9 | 1.0378 ± 0.0022 | 37.8 ± 2.2 | 39.0 ± 2.4 | −1.2 ± 4.6 |
| 68785 | 2010 | Late ring | −24.0 | 1.0805 ± 0.0023 | 80.5 ± 2.3 | 40.0 ± 2.7 | 40.5 ± 5.0 |
| 68786 | 2010 | Early ring | −24.3 | 1.1523 ± 0.0022 | 152.3 ± 2.2 | 40.0 ± 2.7 | 112.3 ± 4.9 |
| 5. Tomioka-2 (TOM-2, 37°20′33.0″N, 141°00′16.5″E, SSW 9 km of FDNPP) | |||||||
| 68792 | 2012 | Whole ring | −24.5 | 1.0649 ± 0.0021 | 64.9 ± 2.1 | 31.5 ± 2.0 | 33.4 ± 4.1 |
| 68793 | 2011 | Late ring | −24.4 | 1.0744 ± 0.0022 | 74.4 ± 2.2 | 39.0 ± 2.4 | 35.4 ± 4.6 |
| 68794 | 2011 | Early ring | −24.3 | 1.0725 ± 0.0022 | 72.5 ± 2.2 | 39.0 ± 2.4 | 33.5 ± 4.6 |
| 68795 | 2010 | Late ring | −26.1 | 1.0819 ± 0.0021 | 81.9 ± 2.1 | 40.0 ± 2.7 | 41.9 ± 4.8 |
| 68796 | 2010 | Early ring | −24.7 | 1.0963 ± 0.0021 | 96.3 ± 2.1 | 40.0 ± 2.7 | 56.3 ± 4.8 |
aData from [16]
Fig. 2Sub-annual variations of Δ14C in tree-ring compared with the background value. The data of TAK and FUT was from [14], and the sub-unit data in the early wood and late wood from FUT was averaged to obtain the value for the whole early wood and late wood. The data from SCL was chosen as background [21]. The 1 σ uncertainties were within the marks
Fig. 3Annual change of Δ14C of tree ring samples in the vicinity of FDNPP from 2010 to 2012. The x-axis represnts the distance from FDNPP, the negative for NW and the positive for SW. The ∆14C data of early wood and late wood units from the same year was averaged to present the whole-year value. Then the annual data of the samples from the same location was averaged to obtain the whole year value for individual sampling location. The data of OKU was from [16]. The data of YAM, SHI, OGA, TAK and FUT was from [14]. The data from SCL was chosen as background [21]. The 1 σ uncertainties were shown in the figure