Literature DB >> 29104296

Efficient Computation of Reduced Regression Models.

Stuart R Lipsitz1, Garrett M Fitzmaurice2, Debajyoti Sinha3, Nathanael Hevelone4, Edward Giovannucci5, Quoc-Dien Trinh6, Jim C Hu7.   

Abstract

We consider settings where it is of interest to fit and assess regression submodels that arise as various explanatory variables are excluded from a larger regression model. The larger model is referred to as the full model; the submodels are the reduced models. We show that a computationally efficient approximation to the regression estimates under any reduced model can be obtained from a simple weighted least squares (WLS) approach based on the estimated regression parameters and covariance matrix from the full model. This WLS approach can be considered an extension to unbiased estimating equations of a first-order Taylor series approach proposed by Lawless and Singhal. Using data from the 2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), a 20% weighted, stratified, cluster sample of approximately 8 million hospital stays from approximately 1000 hospitals, we illustrate the WLS approach when fitting interval censored regression models to estimate the effect of type of surgery (robotic versus nonrobotic surgery) on hospital length-of-stay while adjusting for three sets of covariates: patient-level characteristics, hospital characteristics, and zip-code level characteristics. Ordinarily, standard fitting of the reduced models to the NIS data takes approximately 10 hours; using the proposed WLS approach, the reduced models take seconds to fit.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complementary log–log regression; Weighted estimating equations; Weighted least squares; c survey

Year:  2017        PMID: 29104296      PMCID: PMC5664962          DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2017.1296375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Stat        ISSN: 0003-1305            Impact factor:   8.710


  5 in total

1.  Efficient screening of covariates in population models using Wald's approximation to the likelihood ratio test.

Authors:  K G Kowalski; M M Hutmacher
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  New technology and health care costs--the case of robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Gabriel I Barbash; Sherry A Glied
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Survey inference for subpopulations.

Authors:  B I Graubard; E L Korn
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Regression analysis of grouped survival data with application to breast cancer data.

Authors:  R L Prentice; L A Gloeckler
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  The analysis of relapse clinical trials, with application to a comparison of two ulcer treatments.

Authors:  J Whitehead
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.373

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.