Literature DB >> 29104016

Single-dose del Nido Cardioplegia in Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery.

Daniel Ziazadeh1, Regina Mater1, Ben Himelhoch1, Andrew Borgman2, Jessica L Parker3, Charles L Willekes4, Tomasz A Timek5.   

Abstract

del Nido cardioplegia (DC) offers prolonged cardiac protection with single-dose administration and has been shown to be safe in adult CABG surgery. We set out to evaluate the efficacy of cardiac protection and clinical outcomes of DC versus standard blood cardioplegia (BC) in minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. From August 2011 to May 2016, 178 patients underwent minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (mini-AVR) with BC (n = 101) or DC (n = 77). Ministernotomy or right minithoracotomy was utilized for surgical access. Clinical patient characteristics and data were extracted from our local Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database and the electronic medical record. Patients were propensity matched for age, gender, body mass index, valve size and type, STS score, surgical access, preop creatinine, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, yielding 63 well-matched pairs. There was no difference in patient age, preoperative creatinine, body mass index, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or STS score between BC and DC before or after propensity matching. BC patients received both anterograde and retrograde cardioplegias in multiple doses, whereas DC was delivered almost entirely anterograde with 95% of the patients (73/77) receiving a single dose only. DC was associated with decreased cardiopulmonary bypass time (108 ± 24 vs 135 ± 43 minutes, P = 0.001) and aortic cross-clamp time (80 ± 16 vs 102 ± 30 min, P = 0.001) and maximal glucose levels during cardiopulmonary bypass (165 ± 39 vs 202 ± 49 mg/dL, P = 0.001), whereas troponin T level did not differ between DC and BC (0.3 ± 0.29 vs 0.44 ± 1.7 ng/mL, P = 0.7). Preoperative ejection fraction did not change in either BC (64% ± 12% vs 61% ± 10%, P = 0.09) or DC (58% ± 14% vs 57% ± 14%, P = 0.4) after AVR. In minimally invasive AVR surgery, DC provided equivalent myocardial protection and clinical outcomes to BC while simplifying cardioprotective regimen and reducing aortic cross-clamp time. DC was associated with lower cardiopulmonary bypass glucose levels and demonstrated the feasibility of a single-dose administration.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CABG; cardioplegia; del Nido cardioplegia; myocardial protection

Year:  2017        PMID: 29104016     DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2017.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1043-0679


  4 in total

Review 1.  Del Nido cardioplegia - what is the current evidence?

Authors:  Krzysztof Sanetra; Ireneusz Pawlak; Marek Cisowski
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2018-06-25

2.  Transitioning to Del Nido cardioplegia for all-comers: the next switching gear?

Authors:  Mohamed Marzouk; Valerie Lafreniere-Bessi; Stephanie Dionne; Serge Simard; Christian Pigeon; François Dagenais; Niv Ad; Frederic Jacques
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 3.  Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Yasir Abu-Omar; Ibrahim T Fazmin; Jason M Ali; Marc P Pelletier
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  A novel dosing strategy of del Nido cardioplegia in aortic surgery.

Authors:  Megan M Chung; William C Erwin; Yuming Ning; Yanling Zhao; Christine Chan; Alex D'Angelo; Alexander Kossar; Jessica Spellman; Paul Kurlansky; Hiroo Takayama
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-04-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.