Literature DB >> 29103754

Prognostic value of c-MET in head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data.

Petr Szturz1, Marie Budíková2, Jan B Vermorken3, Ivana Horová2, Břetislav Gál4, Eric Raymond5, Armand de Gramont6, Sandrine Faivre7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (c-MET) ligand/receptor axis has been implicated in pathogenesis of malignant diseases including squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Overexpression of c-MET has been reported as a common molecular abnormality in SCCHN, although its prognostic and predictive value remains to be validated.
METHODS: We systematically searched literature for studies evaluating c-MET expression on immunohistochemistry in newly diagnosed, non-metastatic SCCHN. The c-MET expressing cases were classified into three categories according to predefined cut-off values for positivity. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of c-MET expression and its relationship with selected clinicopathological variables.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies with 2019 cases were included. Relative frequencies of c-MET expression above cut-off levels I, II, and III were 81.8%, 63.8%, and 46.2%, respectively. Differences between these three values were statistically significant (p<1.0×10-6). Above cut-off level II, c-MET positivity was associated with worse overall survival (p=4.0×10-6), positive nodal status (p=1.0×10-4), higher disease stage (p=7.0×10-4), older age (p=2.1×10-3), disease recurrence (p=2.0×10-2), and primary tumour localization in the oral cavity (p=2.3×10-2). Above cut-off level III, c-MET positivity was associated with worse disease-free or progression-free survival (p=9.0×10-6), p16 negativity (p=2.4×10-4), worse overall survival (p=4.0×10-4), positive epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status (p=7.2×10-4), and larger primary tumours (p=4.6×10-3).
CONCLUSION: In SCCHN, immunohistochemical overexpression of c-MET above cut-off levels III and particularly II was associated with inferior survival outcomes and advanced disease. Moreover, it represents a promising predictive biomarker for c-MET targeting, yet the optimal scoring method remains to be defined.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Head and neck cancer; Immunohistochemistry; Overexpression; Predictive factor; Prognostic factor; c-MET receptor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29103754     DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  9 in total

1.  A randomized phase 2 network trial of tivantinib plus cetuximab versus cetuximab in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Sara E Kochanny; Francis P Worden; Douglas R Adkins; Dean W Lim; Julie E Bauman; Stephanie A Wagner; Ryan J Brisson; Theodore G Karrison; Walter M Stadler; Everett E Vokes; Tanguy Y Seiwert
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  A c-Met Inhibitor Suppresses Osteosarcoma Progression via the ERK1/2 Pathway in Human Osteosarcoma Cells.

Authors:  Weijie Chen; Su Wu; Yang Huang; Tingting Zhang; Hao Dong; Xing Zheng; Tao Chen; Xiaokang Gong; Gang Liu; Xing Zhao
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Targeting Cellular Metabolism Modulates Head and Neck Oncogenesis.

Authors:  Yi-Ta Hsieh; Yi-Fen Chen; Shu-Chun Lin; Kuo-Wei Chang; Wan-Chun Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Hepatocyte Growth Factor Overexpression Slows the Progression of 4NQO-Induced Oral Tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Xiaoxi He; Si Chen; Yinghua Tang; Xiaomin Zhao; Liting Yan; Lihong Wu; Zhicong Wu; Weijia Liu; Xinming Chen; Xinhong Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Value of c-MET and Associated Signaling Elements for Predicting Outcomes and Targeted Therapy in Penile Cancer.

Authors:  Anita Thomas; Kimberly Sue Slade; Roman A Blaheta; Sascha D Markowitsch; Philipp Stenzel; Katrin E Tagscherer; Wilfried Roth; Mario Schindeldecker; Martin Michaelis; Florian Rothweiler; Jaroslav Cinatl; Robert Dotzauer; Olesya Vakhrusheva; Maarten Albersen; Axel Haferkamp; Eva Juengel; Jindrich Cinatl; Igor Tsaur
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  HGF/c-MET pathway in cancer: from molecular characterization to clinical evidence.

Authors:  Jianjiang Fu; Xiaorui Su; Zhihua Li; Ling Deng; Xiawei Liu; Xuancheng Feng; Juan Peng
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  The Influence of Met Receptor Level on HGF-Induced Glycolytic Reprogramming in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Verena Boschert; Nicola Klenk; Alexander Abt; Sudha Janaki Raman; Markus Fischer; Roman C Brands; Axel Seher; Christian Linz; Urs D A Müller-Richter; Thorsten Bischler; Stefan Hartmann
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  The Integrated Analyses of Driver Genes Identify Key Biomarkers in Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Qili Xu; Aili Song; Qigui Xie
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

9.  The Occurrence of MET Ectodomain Shedding in Oral Cancer and Its Potential Impact on the Use of Targeted Therapies.

Authors:  Maria J De Herdt; Berdine van der Steen; Robert J Baatenburg de Jong; Leendert H J Looijenga; Senada Koljenović; Jose A Hardillo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 6.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.