Literature DB >> 29103719

Symposium review: Possibilities in an age of genomics: The future of selection indices.

J B Cole1, P M VanRaden2.   

Abstract

Selective breeding has been practiced since domestication, but early breeders commonly selected on appearance (e.g., coat color) rather than performance traits (e.g., milk yield). A breeding index converts information about several traits into a single number used for selection and to predict an animal's own performance. Calculation of selection indices is straightforward when phenotype and pedigree data are available. Prediction of economic values 3 to 10 yr in the future, when the offspring of matings planned using the index will be lactating, is more challenging. The first USDA selection index included only milk and fat yield, whereas the latest version of the lifetime net merit index includes 13 traits and composites (weighted averages of other additional traits). Selection indices are revised to reflect improved knowledge of biology, new sources of data, and changing economic conditions. Single-trait selection often suffers from antagonistic correlations with traits not in the selection objective. Multiple-trait selection avoids those problems at the cost of less-than-maximal progress for individual traits. How many and which traits to include is not simple to determine because traits are not independent. Many countries use indices that reflect the needs of different producers in different environments. Although the emphasis placed on trait groups differs, most indices include yield, fertility, health, and type traits. Addition of milk composition, feed intake, and other traits is possible, but they are more costly to collect and many are not yet directly rewarded in the marketplace, such as with incentives from milk processing plants. As the number of traits grows, custom selection indices can more closely match genotypes to the environments in which they will perform. Traditional selection required recording lots of cows across many farms, but genomic selection favors collecting more detailed information from cooperating farms. A similar strategy may be useful in less developed countries. Recording important new traits on a fraction of cows can quickly benefit the whole population through genomics.
Copyright © 2018 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breeding program; genetic improvement; selection index

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29103719     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  14 in total

1.  Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Female Fertility Traits in the Polish Holstein-Friesian Population.

Authors:  Agnieszka Otwinowska-Mindur; Ewa Ptak; Wojciech Jagusiak; Andrzej Zarnecki
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Validation of a beef cattle maternal breeding objective based on a cross-sectional analysis of a large national cattle database.

Authors:  Alan J Twomey; Andrew R Cromie; Noirin McHugh; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Uncovering Sub-Structure and Genomic Profiles in Across-Countries Subpopulations of Angus Cattle.

Authors:  Diercles Francisco Cardoso; Gerardo Alves Fernandes Júnior; Daiane Cristina Becker Scalez; Anderson Antonio Carvalho Alves; Ana Fabrícia Braga Magalhães; Tiago Bresolin; Ricardo Vieira Ventura; Changxi Li; Márcia Cristina de Sena Oliveira; Laercio Ribeiro Porto-Neto; Roberto Carvalheiro; Henrique Nunes de Oliveira; Humberto Tonhati; Lucia Galvão Albuquerque
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Factors That Optimize Reproductive Efficiency in Dairy Herds with an Emphasis on Timed Artificial Insemination Programs.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Cardoso Consentini; Milo Charles Wiltbank; Roberto Sartori
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Genome-wide scan for common variants associated with intramuscular fat and moisture content in rainbow trout.

Authors:  Ali Ali; Rafet Al-Tobasei; Daniela Lourenco; Tim Leeds; Brett Kenney; Mohamed Salem
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Negative Energy Balance Influences Nutritional Quality of Milk from Czech Fleckvieh Cows due Changes in Proportion of Fatty Acids.

Authors:  Jaromír Ducháček; Luděk Stádník; Martin Ptáček; Jan Beran; Monika Okrouhlá; Matúš Gašparík
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Gene Mapping and Gene-Set Analysis for Milk Fever Incidence in Holstein Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  Hendyel A Pacheco; Simone da Silva; Anil Sigdel; Chun Kuen Mak; Klibs N Galvão; Rodrigo A Texeira; Laila T Dias; Francisco Peñagaricano
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  GWAS and eQTL analysis identifies a SNP associated with both residual feed intake and GFRA2 expression in beef cattle.

Authors:  Marc G Higgins; Claire Fitzsimons; Matthew C McClure; Clare McKenna; Stephen Conroy; David A Kenny; Mark McGee; Sinéad M Waters; Derek W Morris
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  The incompletely fulfilled promise of embryo transfer in cattle-why aren't pregnancy rates greater and what can we do about it?

Authors:  Peter J Hansen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Genomic Prediction for Twin Pregnancies.

Authors:  Shaileen P McGovern; Daniel J Weigel; Brenda C Fessenden; Dianelys Gonzalez-Peña; Natascha Vukasinovic; Anthony K McNeel; Fernando A Di Croce
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.