Rosemary E Morgan1, SuEllen J Pommier2, Rodney F Pommier3. 1. Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR. 2. Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR. 3. Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR. Electronic address: pommierr@ohsu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recently, there has been a move toward decreasing the threshold for liver debulking for metastatic carcinoid tumors from 90% to 70%. The debulking threshold and factors that predict outcomes of liver debulking operations specifically among pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are not well defined. METHODS: Records of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors undergoing liver debulking with a threshold of 70% from 2006 to 2016 were reviewed. Extrahepatic metastases and positive margins by enucleation were allowed. Liver progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method for various factors and compared by log-rank. Factors also were correlated with liver progression-free survival and overall survival by multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: Forty-two patients underwent 44 operations, of which 24 resulted in 100% debulking, 12 resulted in ≥90% debulking, and 8 resulted in ≥70% debulking. Median liver progression-free survival was 11 months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 81%. There were no significant differences in outcome based on percent debulked. Only liver metastasis ≥5 cm correlated with liver progression-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSION: Consideration should be given to expanding the criteria for liver debulking in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors to include a new threshold of >70% debulking, intermediate grade tumors, positive margins, and extrahepatic metastases; these criteria yield results indistinguishable from complete resection. Using these expanded criteria will increase the number of patients eligible for an operation and maintain high survival rates.
BACKGROUND: Recently, there has been a move toward decreasing the threshold for liver debulking for metastatic carcinoid tumors from 90% to 70%. The debulking threshold and factors that predict outcomes of liver debulking operations specifically among pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are not well defined. METHODS: Records of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors undergoing liver debulking with a threshold of 70% from 2006 to 2016 were reviewed. Extrahepatic metastases and positive margins by enucleation were allowed. Liver progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method for various factors and compared by log-rank. Factors also were correlated with liver progression-free survival and overall survival by multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: Forty-two patients underwent 44 operations, of which 24 resulted in 100% debulking, 12 resulted in ≥90% debulking, and 8 resulted in ≥70% debulking. Median liver progression-free survival was 11 months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 81%. There were no significant differences in outcome based on percent debulked. Only liver metastasis ≥5 cm correlated with liver progression-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSION: Consideration should be given to expanding the criteria for liver debulking in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors to include a new threshold of >70% debulking, intermediate grade tumors, positive margins, and extrahepatic metastases; these criteria yield results indistinguishable from complete resection. Using these expanded criteria will increase the number of patients eligible for an operation and maintain high survival rates.
Authors: James R Howe; Nipun B Merchant; Claudius Conrad; Xavier M Keutgen; Julie Hallet; Jeffrey A Drebin; Rebecca M Minter; Terry C Lairmore; Jennifer F Tseng; Herbert J Zeh; Steven K Libutti; Gagandeep Singh; Jeffrey E Lee; Thomas A Hope; Michelle K Kim; Yusuf Menda; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Jennifer A Chan; Rodney F Pommier Journal: Pancreas Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Steven D Scoville; Dimitrios Xourafas; Aslam M Ejaz; Allan Tsung; Timothy Pawlik; Jordan M Cloyd Journal: World J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2020-04-27
Authors: Servando Hernandez Vargas; Susanne Kossatz; Julie Voss; Sukhen C Ghosh; Hop S Tran Cao; Jo Simien; Thomas Reiner; Sadhna Dhingra; William E Fisher; Ali Azhdarinia Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jordan M Cloyd; Aslam Ejaz; Bhavana Konda; Mina S Makary; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 7.293
Authors: Aaron T Scott; Patrick J Breheny; Kendall J Keck; Andrew M Bellizzi; Joseph S Dillon; Thomas M O'Dorisio; James R Howe Journal: Surgery Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Catherine G Tran; Scott K Sherman; Chandrikha Chandrasekharan; James R Howe Journal: Surg Oncol Clin N Am Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 3.495