Literature DB >> 29103402

Fruit and vegetable intake among participants in a District of Columbia farmers' market incentive programme.

Sara Pellegrino1, Anna Bost1, Meghan McGonigle1, Lillie Rosen2, Amelia Peterson-Kosecki3, Uriyoan Colon-Ramos4, Kim Robien1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Limited research is available on whether participation in healthy food incentive programmes is associated with higher fruit and vegetable intake. The objective of the present study was to determine fruit and vegetable intake among participants in the Produce Plus Program, a farmers' market-based healthy food incentive programme in Washington, DC, and identify demographic and behavioural factors associated with higher fruit and vegetable intake.
DESIGN: Using a cross-sectional survey, programme participants were interviewed at markets across DC between June and September 2015. Questions included the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) fruit and vegetable module. Fruit and vegetable intake among 2013 DC BRFSS participants reporting annual household incomes of ≤$US 35 000 was calculated for context.
SETTING: Washington, DC, USA.
SUBJECTS: Participants (n 288) in the Produce Plus Program.
RESULTS: On average, participants reported consuming both fruits (interquartile range: 1·0-3·0) and vegetables (interquartile range: 1·3-3·5) two times/d. Participants who reported eating home-cooked meals ≥3 times/week also reported higher median fruit (2·0 v. 0·8) and vegetable (2·3 v. 1·3) intake compared with those eating home-cooked meals less frequently. No statistically significant differences in reported median fruit or vegetable intake were observed over the course of the farmers' market (June v. August/September) season.
CONCLUSIONS: Produce Plus Program participants reported higher median fruit and vegetable intake compared with DC BRFSS respondents with similar incomes, but still below recommended levels. More frequent home-cooked meals were associated with higher fruit and vegetable intake. Thus, efforts to increase home cooking may represent an opportunity to increase fruit and vegetable intake among healthy food incentive participants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Farmers’ market; Fruit; Incentive programme; Low-income; Vegetable

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29103402     DOI: 10.1017/S1368980017003020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.022


  5 in total

1.  Reducing food insecurity and improving fruit and vegetable intake through a nutrition incentive program in Michigan, USA.

Authors:  C A Parks; P Han; H E Fricke; H A Parker; O B Hesterman; A L Yaroch
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2021-08-17

2.  Healthy Food Prescription Programs and their Impact on Dietary Behavior and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Saiuj Bhat; Daisy H Coyle; Kathy Trieu; Bruce Neal; Dariush Mozaffarian; Matti Marklund; Jason H Y Wu
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  Comparison of Fruit and Vegetable Prices between Farmers' Markets and Supermarkets: Implications for Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs for Food Assistance Program Participants.

Authors:  Sridharshi C Hewawitharana; Karen L Webb; Ron Strochlic; Wendi Gosliner
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Relationships among Local Agricultural Product Purchases, Self-Cooked Meal Consumption, and Healthy Eating Habits: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Town in Gunma, Japan.

Authors:  Daisuke Machida; Yuki Sugiura
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-11

5.  Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participants: A Scoping Review of Program Structure.

Authors:  Katherine Engel; Elizabeth H Ruder
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 5.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.