Literature DB >> 29103150

Caregiver social support quality when interacting with cancer survivors: advancing the dual-process model of supportive communication.

Jacquelyn Harvey-Knowles1, Meara H Faw2.   

Abstract

Cancer caregivers often experience significant challenges in their motivation and ability to comfort cancer survivors, particularly in a spousal or romantic context. Spousal cancer caregivers have been known to report even greater levels of burden and distress than cancer sufferers, yet still take on the role of acting as an informal caregiver so they can attend to their partner's needs. The current study tested whether a theoretical model of supportive outcomes-the dual-process model of supportive communication-explained variations in cancer caregivers' motivation and ability to create high-quality support messages. The study also tested whether participant engagement with reflective journaling on supportive acts was associated with increased motivation or ability to generate high-quality support messages. Based upon the dual-process model, we posited that, following supportive journaling tasks, caregivers of spouses currently managing a cancer experience would report greater motivation but also greater difficulty in generating high-quality support messages, while individuals caring for a patient in remission would report lower motivation but greater ability to create high-quality support messages. Findings provided support for these assertions and suggested that reflective journaling tasks might be a useful tool for improving remission caregivers' ability to provide high-quality social support to survivors. Corresponding theoretical and applied implications are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ability; Cancer caregiving; Dual-process theory of supportive outcomes; Motivation; Social support provision

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29103150     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3951-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  19 in total

1.  Social support, life stress, pain and emotional adjustment to advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  C Koopman; K Hermanson; S Diamond; K Angell; D Spiegel
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 2.  Social support and adjustment to cancer: reconciling descriptive, correlational, and intervention research.

Authors:  V S Helgeson; S Cohen
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis.

Authors:  E McAuley; T Duncan; V V Tammen
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Cancer and quality of life in spousal dyads: spillover in couples with and without cancer-related health problems.

Authors:  Kristin Litzelman; Paige A Green; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Social networks, social support, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Candyce H Kroenke; Laura D Kubzansky; Eva S Schernhammer; Michelle D Holmes; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden.

Authors:  S H Zarit; K E Reever; J Bach-Peterson
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1980-12

7.  Quality of life concerns and depression among hematopoietic stem cell transplant survivors.

Authors:  Catherine E Mosher; Katherine N DuHamel; Christine Rini; Geoffrey Corner; Joanne Lam; William H Redd
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Social support, reciprocity, and well-being.

Authors:  L Lu
Journal:  J Soc Psychol       Date:  1997-10

9.  Cognitive functioning under stress: evidence from informal caregivers of palliative patients.

Authors:  Corey S Mackenzie; Marilyn C Smith; Lynn Hasher; Larry Leach; Pearl Behl
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.947

10.  Social relationships and health.

Authors:  J S House; K R Landis; D Umberson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-07-29       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.