Literature DB >> 29102459

Health Insurance Status and Clinical Cancer Screenings Among U.S. Adults.

Guixiang Zhao1, Catherine A Okoro2, Jun Li3, Machell Town2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Health insurance coverage is linked to clinical preventive service use. This study examined cancer screenings among U.S. adults by health insurance status.
METHODS: The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System collected data on healthcare access and cancer screenings from 42 states and the District of Columbia in 2014. Data analyses were conducted in 2016. Participants' health insurance status during the preceding 12 months was categorized as adequately insured, underinsured, or never insured. Primary type of insurance coverage was categorized as employer-based or Medicare (aged ≥65 years), self-purchased plan, Medicaid/Medicare (aged <65 years), and other public insurance. Clinical cancer screenings were assessed following the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.
RESULTS: Compared with adequately insured adults, underinsured and never insured women were 6% (p<0.001) and 41% (p<0.001) less likely to receive breast cancer screening, respectively; 1% (p<0.05) and 19% (p<0.001) less likely to receive cervical cancer screening, respectively; and 3% (p<0.01) and 47% (p<0.001) less likely to receive colorectal cancer screening, respectively; underinsured and never insured men were 6% (p<0.001) and 52% (p<0.001) less likely to receive colorectal cancer screening, respectively. Compared with adults with employer-based insurance/Medicare (aged ≥65 years), women with all other types of insurance were less likely to receive breast and cervical cancer screenings; women and men with self-purchased plans were less likely to receive colorectal cancer screening; however, men with other public insurance were more likely to receive colorectal cancer screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in cancer screenings by health insurance status and type of insurance exist among U.S. adults. Greater efforts to increase screening rates and to reduce disparities in cancer screenings are an important strategy to help improve overall population health. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29102459     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  22 in total

1.  Insurance Coverage, Employment Status, and Financial Well-Being of Young Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Florence K L Tangka; Sujha Subramanian; Madeleine Jones; Patrick Edwards; Timothy Flanigan; Yevgeniya Kaganova; Kevin W Smith; Cheryll C Thomas; Nikki A Hawkins; Juan Rodriguez; Temeika Fairley; Gery P Guy
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Breast Screening Utilization and Cost Sharing Among Employed Insured Women Following the Affordable Care Act: Impact of Race and Income.

Authors:  Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy; A Mark Fendrick; Sarah Bell; Neil Kamdar; Emily Kobernik; Vanessa K Dalton; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Reduced Survival Outcome After Receiving a New Cancer Diagnosis in the Emergency Department: Findings from a Hospital Network in Rural Eastern North Carolina.

Authors:  Hannah L Conley; C Suzanne Lea; Raven V Delgado; Paul Vos; Eleanor E Harris; Andrew Ju; Kimberly M Rathbun
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2022-10-10

4.  Lung Cancer Screening Uptake: Analysis of BRFSS 2018.

Authors:  Dustin Kee; Juan Wisnivesky; Minal S Kale
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 6.473

5.  Factors Affecting Adherence in a Pragmatic Trial of Annual Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Carrie M Nielson; William M Vollmer; Amanda F Petrik; Erin M Keast; Beverly B Green; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Promoting Clinical Conversations about Lung Cancer Screening: Exploring the Role of Perceived Online Social Support.

Authors:  Samantha R Paige; Ramzi G Salloum; Janice L Krieger; Maribeth Williams; Wei Xue; Babette Brumback
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2020-10-29

7.  A Workplace-Based Intervention to Improve Awareness, Knowledge, and Utilization of Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screenings Among Latino Service and Manual Labor Employees in Utah.

Authors:  Echo L Warner; Laura Martel; Judy Y Ou; Gina E Nam; Sara Carbajal-Salisbury; Virginia Fuentes; Anne C Kirchhoff; Deanna Kepka
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2019-04

8.  Development and validation of a nomogram to predict overall survival of T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Jia Yu; Wenyu Hu; Nan Yao; Mengzi Sun; Xiaotong Li; Ling Wang; Yixue Yang; Bo Li
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  Sociodemographic correlates of colorectal cancer screening completion among women adherent to mammography screening guidelines by place of birth.

Authors:  Deeonna E Farr; Leslie E Cofie; Alison T Brenner; Ronny A Bell; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.742

10.  Transparent reporting of hypotheses and analyses in behavioral medicine research: An audit of publications in 2018 and 2008.

Authors:  Megan A McVay; Kellie B Cooper; Montserrat Carrera Seoane; Marissa L Donahue; Laura D Scherer
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2021-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.