Literature DB >> 29102440

Patient satisfaction with Radioguided Occult Lesion Localisation using iodine-125 seeds ('ROLLIS') versus conventional hookwire localisation.

Jeremy S L Ong1, Joelin Teh2, Christobel Saunders3, Anita G Bourke4, Catalina Lizama5, Jade Newton6, Michael Phillips7, Donna B Taylor8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with impalpable or poorly palpable breast cancer require radiologically guided localisation prior to breast conserving surgery. Radioguided Occult Lesion Localisation using Iodine-125 Seed (ROLLIS) is an emerging alternative to conventional Hookwire Localisation (HWL). We compared ROLLIS with conventional HWL with respect to patient reported stress and discomfort related to the localisation procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 2013 to January 2016, women who were eligible for breast conserving surgery with impalpable or poorly palpable histologically confirmed invasive or in-situ carcinoma were recruited to the multi-centre ROLLIS randomised controlled trial and underwent either ROLLIS or HWL. Following surgery, a questionnaire was administered to each participant regarding the stress and discomfort related to the localisation procedure. Multivariate analysis was performed to compare the primary outcome of patient-reported stress and discomfort between localisation groups.
RESULTS: 218 participants with 220 lesions were randomised and underwent breast conserving surgery following localisation. 201 (92.2%) and 202 (92.7%) of participants provided responses to the stress and discomfort components of the questionnaire respectively. HWL was associated with a statistically significant increased odds of greater stress and discomfort when compared to ROLLIS (OR = 2.07, p = 0.01 and OR = 1.94, p = 0.01 respectively). Insertion of multiple localisation devices was also associated with increased stress (OR = 5.68, p < 0.01) and discomfort (OR = 2.96, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: When compared with conventional HWL, ROLLIS is associated with significantly less stress and discomfort for patients prior to breast conserving surgery. Crown
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Breast conserving surgery; Hookwire; Patient satisfaction; Radioactive seed

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29102440     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.09.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  3 in total

1.  Multimodal soft tissue markers for bridging high-resolution diagnostic imaging with therapeutic intervention.

Authors:  Anders E Hansen; Jonas R Henriksen; Rasmus I Jølck; Frederikke P Fliedner; Linda M Bruun; Jonas Scherman; Andreas I Jensen; Per Munck Af Rosenschöld; Lilah Moorman; Sorel Kurbegovic; Steen R de Blanck; Klaus R Larsen; Paul F Clementsen; Anders N Christensen; Mads H Clausen; Wenbo Wang; Paul Kempen; Merete Christensen; Niels-Erik Viby; Gitte Persson; Rasmus Larsen; Knut Conradsen; Fintan J McEvoy; Andreas Kjaer; Thomas Eriksen; Thomas L Andresen
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 14.136

2.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Suspicious Calcifications From Various Populations: A Comparison With Full-field Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Juntao Li; Hengwei Zhang; Hui Jiang; Xuhui Guo; Yinli Zhang; Dan Qi; Jitian Guan; Zhenzhen Liu; Erxi Wu; Suxia Luo
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 7.271

3.  Feasibility of radioguided occult lesion localization of clip-marked lymph nodes for tailored axillary treatment in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

Authors:  Daan Hellingman; Maarten L Donswijk; Gonneke A O Winter-Warnars; Petra de Koekkoek-Doll; Marilyn Pinas; Yvonne Budde-van Namen; Johan Westerga; Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters; Nikola Kimmings; Marcel P M Stokkel
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.138

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.