Literature DB >> 29102427

Effect of repeated cryopreservation on human embryo developmental potential.

Xiaoying Zheng1, Yuan Chen1, Jie Yan1, Yuqi Wu1, Xinjie Zhuang1, Shengli Lin1, Jinliang Zhu1, Ying Lian1, Jie Qiao1, Ping Liu2.   

Abstract

Repeated cryopreservation of surplus embryos from frozen-thawed cycles should occasionally be considered. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the pregnancy and perinatal outcome of repeated cryopreservation by vitrification of human blastocysts derived from slowly frozen-thawed day 3 embryos. In total, 571 vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles were investigated. The vitrified-warmed blastocysts were derived from slowly frozen-thawed cleavage embryos (twice-cryopreserved group) or fresh embryos (control group) cultured to the blastocyst stage. Age, body mass index, endometrial thickness, blastocyst developmental rate and number of embryos transferred were not significantly different between twice-cryopreserved and control groups. Clinical pregnancy and implantation rates were also similar. Compared with controls, the miscarriage rate was significantly higher in the twice-cryopreserved group (33.93% versus 19.07%, P = 0.017). This resulted in a significantly lower live birth rate in the twice-cryopreserved group than in controls (29.13% versus 39.18, P = 0.038). No differences were observed in mean gestational age, birthweight and sex ratio of newborns between groups. In conclusion, acceptable clinical pregnancy outcomes may be expected from transfer of twice-cryopreserved human embryos. While the neonatal outcome is not affected, the correlation between the risk of higher pregnancy loss and repeated cryopreservation needs further investigation.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Live birth rate; Pregnancy loss; Repeated cryopreservation; Vitrified-warmed blastocyst cycle

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29102427     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  11 in total

1.  Accumulation of Cleavage-Stage Embryos by Vitrification may Compromise Embryonic Developmental Potential in Preimplantation Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Shun Xiong; Xiangwei Hao; Yang Gao; Lihong Wu; Junxia Liu; Jiang Wang; Jiahong Zhu; Jingyu Li; Dongyun Liu; Wei Han; Guoning Huang
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.060

2.  Anti-Müllerian hormone in guiding the selection of a freeze-all versus a fresh embryo transfer strategy: a cohort study.

Authors:  Kai-Lun Hu; Rui Yang; Huiyu Xu; Ben W Mol; Rong Li; Rui Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 3.357

3.  Analysis of IVF/ICSI outcomes in infertile women with early-stage endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia after conservative treatment.

Authors:  Yaxing Guo; Xuan Zong; Hongzhen Li; Jie Qiao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  Analysis of Factors Associated With Recurrence of Early-Stage Endometrial Carcinoma and Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia in Infertile Women After In Vitro Fertilization Treatment.

Authors:  Yaxing Guo; Xuan Zong; Hongzhen Li; Jie Qiao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Live birth rate following a euploid blastocyst transfer is not affected by double vitrification and warming at cleavage or blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Efstathios Theodorou; Benjamin P Jones; Daniella F Cardenas Armas; Carleen Heath; Paul Serhal; Jara Ben-Nagi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.357

6.  Cryopreservation Does Not Affect the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Oocytes.

Authors:  Hadi Ramadan; Tarita Pakrashi; Andrea R Thurman; Kimball O Pomeroy; Gerard Celia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Blastocyst cryopreservation and cryopreservation-warming transfer is an effective embryo transfer strategy for day 1 rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Authors:  Ming Li; Qin Li; Ying Wang; Jin Huang; Ping Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Blastocyst quality and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing single blastocyst transfer in frozen cycles.

Authors:  Kai-Lun Hu; Xiaoying Zheng; Sarah Hunt; Xiaohong Li; Rong Li; Ben W Mol
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-10-30

9.  National Survey Highlights the Urgent Need for Standardisation of Embryo Transfer Techniques in the UK.

Authors:  Lewis Nancarrow; Nicola Tempest; Andrew J Drakeley; Roy Homburg; Richard Russell; Dharani K Hapangama
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Effect of the Re-Vitrification of Embryos at Different Stages on Embryonic Developmental Potential.

Authors:  Jingyu Li; Shun Xiong; Yanhua Zhao; Chong Li; Wei Han; Guoning Huang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.