Literature DB >> 29102388

[End-of-life debate: Citizen's point of view about deep and continuous sedation].

J Toporski1, T Jonveaux-Rivasseau2, C Lamouille-Chevalier3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Sedation in palliative care meets a precise definition and corresponds to a medical practice. We assessed the comprehension of this practice by the French population.
METHOD: In 2015, citizen expressed their views on the Claeys-Leonetti bill by means of a consultative forum made available on the Internet site of the National Assembly. The content of the messages filed, regarding the right to deep and continuous sedation until death was analyzed using the ALCESTE textual data analysis software, supplemented by a thematic analysis in order to identify the perception that Internet users had of this practice.
RESULTS: Among the 1819 Internet users who participated in the forum, 67 expressed their views as Health professionals, 25 of whom were directly involved in palliative care, as well as 10 sick persons. Analysis with the ALCESTE software highlighted two classes of statements. The first dealing with deep and continuous sedation, reflecting the specificity of the discourse of the Internet users. The second one consisted of textual units in which the modal verbs were dominant and overrepresented, thus providing information on the participants' perceptions. The thematic analysis highlighted four themes: death, intent, treatment and fear.
CONCLUSION: Deep and continuous sedation is perceived as a euthanasic practice or raises fear of such a drift. Provision of extended and accurate information to the population and health professionals is essential to ensure that this new model of sedation is integrated into the care of the terminally ill patients and their families.
Copyright © 2017 Société Nationale Française de Médecine Interne (SNFMI). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Claeys-Leonetti law; Deep and continuous sedation; Démocratie participative; End of life; Euthanasia; Euthanasie; Fin de vie; Loi Claeys-Leonetti; Participatory democracy; Sédation profonde et continue

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29102388     DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2017.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Med Interne        ISSN: 0248-8663            Impact factor:   0.728


  3 in total

1.  Italian Legal Euthanasia: Unconstitutionality of the Referendum and Analysis of the "Italian" Problem.

Authors:  Maricla Marrone; Pietro Berardi; Biagio Solarino; Davide Ferorelli; Serena Corradi; Maria Silvestre; Benedetta Pia De Luca; Alessandra Stellacci; Alessandro Dell'Erba
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2022-07-12

2.  How should health care providers inform about palliative sedation? A qualitative study with palliative care professionals.

Authors:  Allan Cocker; Pascal Singy; Ralf J Jox
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.328

3.  Medicalisation, suffering and control at the end of life: The interplay of deep continuous palliative sedation and assisted dying.

Authors:  Gitte Hanssen Koksvik; Naomi Richards; Sheri Mila Gerson; Lars Johan Materstvedt; David Clark
Journal:  Health (London)       Date:  2020-12-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.